Prospective, In-Vivo, Post-Market Safety and Efficacy Surveillance Registry of the MAXX Orthopedics, Freedom Total Knee® System

NCT ID: NCT06627699

Last Updated: 2024-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2028-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In an effort to satisfy regulatory requirements for post-market surveillance of product safety and efficacy, a representative sample of patients will be recruited for prospective monitoring.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In an effort to satisfy regulatory requirements for post-market surveillance of product safety and efficacy, a representative sample of patients will be recruited for prospective monitoring.

To maintain equal site distribution per device, patient recruitment will include up to a total of twenty (20) registry sites and thirty (30) primary TKA candidates per site / surgeon for a total of 600 registry patients. A total of no more than 200 patients across all sites will be recruited per level of constraint (e.g.: 200 CR, 200:PS, 200:UC) for this registry with a 10-month accrual target from study initiation per site (\~3 patients consented / month).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthristis Total Knee Anthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients receiving the Maxx Freedom Total Knee System for primary TKA

TARGETED PATIENTS Adult male and female patients greater than 18 years of age Candidate for primary TKA GENERAL EXCLUSIONS Active infection Revision / conversion TKA (Prior UKA or HTO)

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Post-Market Surveillance of the Freedom Total Knee System for Primary TKA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Post-Market Surveillance of the Freedom Total Knee System for Primary TKA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Candidates for this registry must meet ALL of the following criteria:

* Patient is \> 18 years of age
* Patient has failed attempts at non-operative conservative therapy
* Patient has participated in the informed consent process and signed an IRB approved informed consent
* Patient is scheduled to undergo unilateral or bilateral primary TKA of the knee

Exclusion Criteria

Candidates will be excluded from the evaluation if ANY of the following apply:

* Patients with previous TKA, UKA, HTO or knee fusion of the indicated knee
* Patients that have undergone previous surgery of indicated knee for tumor, trauma or fracture
* Evidence of active or suspected (systemic or local) infection at time of surgery
* Other significant disabling problems from the musculoskeletal system than in the knee (i.e.: muscular dystrophy, polio, neuropathic joints)
* Patients with or having; malignancy - active malignancy, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, immunologically suppressed, sickle cell anemia and systemic lupus erythematosus
* Patients with neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit
* Women who are pregnant
* Prisoner or transient
* Recent history of known narcotic abuse
* Any significant psychological disturbance past or present, that could impair the consent process or ability to complete subject self-report questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maxx Orthopedics Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Asit Shah, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chief of Orthopedics, Englewood Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ascentist Healthcare

Leawood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

South Texas Bone & Joint Institute

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nach Dave, MS, RPh

Role: CONTACT

732-718-1385

Corey Perine, BS, MBA

Role: CONTACT

215-432-4323

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18467932 (View on PubMed)

Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26937689 (View on PubMed)

Shim J, Hamilton DF. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):832-837. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1543.R1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31256677 (View on PubMed)

Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26926773 (View on PubMed)

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2805470 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://maxxortho.com

Registry sponsor home page

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PK-00002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Porous Baseplate in Total Knee Replacement
NCT05226689 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Active Knee Prosthesis Study
NCT06700668 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA