Effect of Different Stretching Techniques

NCT ID: NCT06608693

Last Updated: 2025-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-27

Study Completion Date

2024-12-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching techniques on the balance and functional capabilities of children diagnosed with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching techniques on the balance and functional capabilities of children diagnosed with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). The study consisted of a group of sixteen children, ranging in age from 8 to 16 years, who were diagnosed with bilateral hip flexor contracture and diplegic cerebral palsy. These children were classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III. The children were randomly divided into PNF and static stretching groups. Stretching techniques were applied 2 days a week for 4 weeks, with 6 repetitions in each session. The study assessed various parameters, including hip extension range of motion (ROM), muscle tone intensity based on the Modified Ashworth Scale, hip flexor shortness as determined by the Thomas Test, the time up and go (TUG) test, balance using the Pediatric Berg Balance Scale, and functional status evaluated through the Gilette Functional Walking Assessment Questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PNF stretching group

PNF and static stretching methods were applied 2 days a week and 6 repetitions in each session for 4 weeks to the hip flexors. In addition to stretching, both of the groups received a routine treatment program consisting of gluteus maximus and quadriceps strengthening, balance, and walking exercises.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PNF stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects lay supine on a treatment table, holding one knee to the chest and letting the other leg extend freely toward the floor at the end of the table. This protocol was adapted from previous studies. The hip joint was carefully and gradually lowered towards the floor, with the knee flexing at a 90-degree angle until the individual experienced a mild stretching sensation (Visual analog scale:4-6). Then, the subject performed a sub-maximal voluntary isometric contraction by utilizing the flexor muscles for 20 seconds while resisting the applied force exerted by an examiner through the utilization of a hand-held dynamometer (K-Force Muscle Control). The examiner proceeded to passively manipulate the leg to achieve the desired range of motion (ROM), maintaining it for 20 seconds. This process was repeated six times for each limb. The patient rested for 2 minutes before applying the same technique to the other side.

Static stretching group

PNF and static stretching methods were applied 2 days a week and 6 repetitions in each session for 4 weeks to the hip flexors. In addition to stretching, both of the groups received a routine treatment program consisting of gluteus maximus and quadriceps strengthening, balance, and walking exercises.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Static stretching group

Intervention Type OTHER

While the patient was lying supine, the hip and knee joints on the non-stretch side were kept in 90⸰ flexion. A sandbag was positioned on the side to be stretched, specifically proximal to the patella, in order to induce a moderate sensation of stretching in the patient. Subsequently, a force was exerted in the direction of hip extension for a duration of 30 seconds. Afterward, the patient was instructed to relax. This process was repeated a total of six times, with a designated 20-second rest period between each repetition. The patient took a two-minute rest before the same technique was applied to the other side. There was no specific order on which side to apply the technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PNF stretching

Subjects lay supine on a treatment table, holding one knee to the chest and letting the other leg extend freely toward the floor at the end of the table. This protocol was adapted from previous studies. The hip joint was carefully and gradually lowered towards the floor, with the knee flexing at a 90-degree angle until the individual experienced a mild stretching sensation (Visual analog scale:4-6). Then, the subject performed a sub-maximal voluntary isometric contraction by utilizing the flexor muscles for 20 seconds while resisting the applied force exerted by an examiner through the utilization of a hand-held dynamometer (K-Force Muscle Control). The examiner proceeded to passively manipulate the leg to achieve the desired range of motion (ROM), maintaining it for 20 seconds. This process was repeated six times for each limb. The patient rested for 2 minutes before applying the same technique to the other side.

Intervention Type OTHER

Static stretching group

While the patient was lying supine, the hip and knee joints on the non-stretch side were kept in 90⸰ flexion. A sandbag was positioned on the side to be stretched, specifically proximal to the patella, in order to induce a moderate sensation of stretching in the patient. Subsequently, a force was exerted in the direction of hip extension for a duration of 30 seconds. Afterward, the patient was instructed to relax. This process was repeated a total of six times, with a designated 20-second rest period between each repetition. The patient took a two-minute rest before the same technique was applied to the other side. There was no specific order on which side to apply the technique.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A clinical diagnosis of CP;
* Age ranging from 6 to 18 years;
* No recent administration of Botulinum Toxin to the lower extremity muscles in the last 6 months;
* An IQ score of 70 or above;
* A Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) value of 1, 2 or 3;
* Presence of hip flexion contracture;
* Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Concomitant diagnoses aside from CP,
* Presenting with muscle tone ratings of 3 or 4 in the hip muscles according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS),
* Who had undergone tendon lengthening surgery to increase hip flexion
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gazi University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Uğur Sözlü

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Selda Başar, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Gazi University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gazi University

Ankara, Emniyet Mahallesi Bandırma Caddesi, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

(KAEK-118/055)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.