Effectiveness of INJEX Versus Traditional Syringe During Restoration of Primary Teeth
NCT ID: NCT06576609
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-16
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. To evaluate pain perception for restoration of primary molars with a needle free system in a pediatric population.
2. To evaluate pain perception for restoration of Primary molars with needle syringe \[Traditional syringe system\] method in a pediatric population
3. Time required to deliver anesthesia using needle free system vs Needle syringe \[ traditional syringe system\] Participants who enrolled in the study will be anesthetized according to the respective groups i,e INJEX (needle free system) and traditional dental needle system and restoration will be done.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Esthetic Restorations Placed in Primary Molars With Composite Resin Enriched With Insoluble Anti Bacterial Nano Particles
NCT00389714
Effect of Computer-controlled vs. Conventional Injection on Pain and Anxiety in Children
NCT07193342
Clinical Performance and Psychological Impact of Colored Restorations Cement in Primary Molars
NCT05557682
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06068244
Evaluation of Different Anesthesias in Children With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT07268157
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sample size estimation:
The sample size was determined using the following formula, based on a difference in mean Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores of 1.2 and a pooled standard deviation of 1.89. Sample Size (n) = 2Sp2 (Z 1-α/2+Z1-β) 2 µd2 where, Z (1-α/2) = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval Z1-β = 0.84 for 80% power Sp2 = pooled standard deviation µd = 1.2 (difference in mean between groups) Substituting these values, the sample size was estimated to be 21. An additional 20% of the estimated sample size was added to account for any potential sampling loss, bringing the final sample size to a total of 25 teeth in each group.
study design: It was a split mouth randomized controlled trial
Randomization:
Teeth designated for restoration were assigned to one of two groups using a simple randomization method with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The allocation was performed using a predetermined list, with the first list for the right side, and the second for the left side. Allocation concealment was maintained through sealed envelopes until the time of intervention to prevent selection bias. On the intervention day, patients identified their number on either the right or left side lists.
Group I: All teeth in this group underwent restoration using the traditional syringe system. Making use of a conventional syringe fitted with a 27-gauge needle (Hogen Spitze, C-K Dental IND.CO., LTD.) local infiltration of Scandicaine 2% Special (mepivacaine hydrochloride and adrenaline) was given.
Group II: Teeth in this group received treatment with the needle-free injection system, INJEX (INJEX Pharma AG, Germany).
Intervention procedure To mitigate any operator-related bias, a single operator conducted the entire anesthesia protocol for all participants in the trial. Utilizing the "Tell-Show-Do" technique, all relevant treatment equipment and protocols were introduced and explained. The injection was thoroughly described using appropriate euphemisms or age-appropriate language.
A sterile dry gauze was used to cleanse the treatment area at the injection site before administering LA. Following this, a very small quantity of topical anesthetic (Benzocaine 20%, NJ, USA) was given and left to remain for a minimum time of 1 minute. Following the application of topical anesthesia, LA was administered based on the participant's assigned group.
After a standard waiting time of 3 minutes for the anesthesia to take effect, dental caries were removed , The pulp capping material, Dycal (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA), was placed, and a type IX glass ionomer cement (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) liner was applied before the final restoration with composite material.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
INJEX
Needle less device
INJEX [ Needle less anesthesia]
already described
Needle syringe
traditional dental needle
INJEX [ Needle less anesthesia]
already described
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
INJEX [ Needle less anesthesia]
already described
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Existence of deep carious Primary molar, indicated for Indirect pup capping.
* Complete physical and mental health without any confounding medical history
* Parents who gave written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Children complaining of irreversible pulpitis.
* Children with Negative behaviour according to the wright's modification of
* Frankl Behaviour Rating scale (FBRS) during initial examination
* Children with medical or mentally compromised
7 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Jazan
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
satish vishwanathaiah
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
College of Dentistry
Jizan, Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
University Jazan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.