Comparative Effectivenes of IASTM and MET on Post Operative Elbow Stiffness
NCT ID: NCT06575855
Last Updated: 2024-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-17
2024-06-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Mobilization and MET Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness
NCT05258162
Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique and Trigger Point Release in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT05050331
Investigation of the Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique on Flexibility and Thickness by Compression Elastography Method in Healthy Individuals.
NCT05503615
Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Gastrocnemius and Achilles Tendon in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT05775302
Autogenic Inhibition Versus Reciprocal Inhibition Muscle Energy Techniques in Iliotibial Band Syndrome
NCT06867159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Group A received IASTM as treatment protocol
IASTM
Group A received IASTM by using Graston Tool
Group B
Group B received METs as a treatment protocol
METS
Group B received METs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IASTM
Group A received IASTM by using Graston Tool
METS
Group B received METs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
30 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sargodha
OTHER
University of Faisalabad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nayyab Goher
Student
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nayyab Goher
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.