Situation Awareness Incorporating Multidisciplinary Teams Reduce Arrests In the Pediatric ICU

NCT ID: NCT06553534

Last Updated: 2024-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2029-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this pragmatic prospective Type 1 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial study is to learn if The Situation Awareness Incorporating Multidisciplinary Teams Reduce Arrests In (SAMURAI) the PICU Bundle can reduce PICU CPR events. The SAMURAI PICU Bundle includes an automated PICU warning tool, twice daily huddles and mitigation plans. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is the adapted bundle will be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate to stakeholders prior to implementation?

Will there be at least a 30% relative reduction in PICU CPR events following successful implementation of the bundle?

Each site will:

Adapt and implement SAMURAI PICU Bundle which includes an automated PICU warning tool, twice daily huddles and mitigation plans

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As nearly 95% of pediatric IHCAs occur in PICUs, we developed an interventional cardiac arrest prevention bundle targeted to PICU healthcare providers. In a previous single center trial, the use of the SAMURAI PICU bundle improved early identification of high-risk patients, increased shared situation awareness, and supported risk mitigation plans, leading to a \>50% decrease in IHCA events requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Early identification occurs via the PICU Warning Tool, an automated, electronic medical record clinical decision support tool that provides a non-interruptive notification to care providers of high-risk patients. This prediction tool prompts a bedside huddle to ensure shared situation awareness and development of a mitigation plan. This novel approach of emphasizing shared situation awareness through automated clinical decision support and mitigation of risk has demonstrated reduction in CPR events and mortality within the PICU clinical environment.

This study employs a user-centered design model to adapt, implement, and assess the feasibility and effectiveness of SAMURAI PICU at other pediatric institutions. The hypothesis is that identification of PICU patients at high risk for IHCA through the use of the PICU Warning Tool and integration of this high-risk status in daily safety huddles will lead to improved shared situation awareness and subsequent reduction in CPR events at participating institutions. This approach will utilize a five-center pragmatic prospective Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation study leveraging the existing infrastructure of Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Adaptive Hybrid Stepped-wedge
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Site A

Site A will begin a transition period of no more than 6 months (while continuing to collect baseline data). During the transition period, the local study team will receive education about the intervention and help tailor the tools and materials to fit their institutional needs. Upon completion of the transition period, Site A will immediately begin the intervention period. They will then remain in the intervention period (using the SAMURAI Bundle) for the remaining study period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAMURAI PICU Bundle

Intervention Type OTHER

The proposed multifaceted SAMURAI PICU Bundle is an intervention with the following core elements: 1) PICU Warning Tool: an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool to provide a non-interruptive interprofessional predictive alert, 2) twice daily safety huddles with unit leadership, and 3) bedside assessment including the care team and patient's family to complete and display a bedside mitigation plan to prevent deterioration. This intervention combines the automated accurate prediction of the PICU Warning Tool with the use of provider intuition or a "gut feeling" from huddles to improve decision making at the bedside. Peripheral elements and possible adaptations will be suggested during Aim 1 and additional peripheral elements may be added by local sites after discussion with the PI through a user-centered design approach.

Site B

Site B will begin a control period of approximately 6 months, during which they will continue to collect data while operating under their institutional standards (No SAMURAI Intervention). At the end of the control period, they will start a transition period of up to 6 months, during which time they will receive education and adapt the tools and materials to fit their institutional needs. At the conclusion of the transition period, they will begin implementing the study intervention (usage of the SAMURAI bundle) for the remaining study period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAMURAI PICU Bundle

Intervention Type OTHER

The proposed multifaceted SAMURAI PICU Bundle is an intervention with the following core elements: 1) PICU Warning Tool: an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool to provide a non-interruptive interprofessional predictive alert, 2) twice daily safety huddles with unit leadership, and 3) bedside assessment including the care team and patient's family to complete and display a bedside mitigation plan to prevent deterioration. This intervention combines the automated accurate prediction of the PICU Warning Tool with the use of provider intuition or a "gut feeling" from huddles to improve decision making at the bedside. Peripheral elements and possible adaptations will be suggested during Aim 1 and additional peripheral elements may be added by local sites after discussion with the PI through a user-centered design approach.

Site C

Site C will begin a control period of approximately 1 year, during which they will continue to collect data while operating under their institutional standards (No SAMURAI Intervention). At the end of the control period, they will start a transition period of up to 6 months, during which time they will receive education and adapt the tools and materials to fit their institutional needs. At the conclusion of the transition period, they will begin implementing the study intervention (usage of the SAMURAI bundle) for the remaining study period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAMURAI PICU Bundle

Intervention Type OTHER

The proposed multifaceted SAMURAI PICU Bundle is an intervention with the following core elements: 1) PICU Warning Tool: an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool to provide a non-interruptive interprofessional predictive alert, 2) twice daily safety huddles with unit leadership, and 3) bedside assessment including the care team and patient's family to complete and display a bedside mitigation plan to prevent deterioration. This intervention combines the automated accurate prediction of the PICU Warning Tool with the use of provider intuition or a "gut feeling" from huddles to improve decision making at the bedside. Peripheral elements and possible adaptations will be suggested during Aim 1 and additional peripheral elements may be added by local sites after discussion with the PI through a user-centered design approach.

Site D

Site D will begin a control period of approximately 1.5 years, during which they will continue to collect data while operating under their institutional standards (No SAMURAI Intervention). At the end of the control period, they will start a transition period of up to 6 months, during which time they will receive education and adapt the tools and materials to fit their institutional needs. At the conclusion of the transition period, they will begin implementing the study intervention (usage of the SAMURAI bundle) for the remaining study period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAMURAI PICU Bundle

Intervention Type OTHER

The proposed multifaceted SAMURAI PICU Bundle is an intervention with the following core elements: 1) PICU Warning Tool: an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool to provide a non-interruptive interprofessional predictive alert, 2) twice daily safety huddles with unit leadership, and 3) bedside assessment including the care team and patient's family to complete and display a bedside mitigation plan to prevent deterioration. This intervention combines the automated accurate prediction of the PICU Warning Tool with the use of provider intuition or a "gut feeling" from huddles to improve decision making at the bedside. Peripheral elements and possible adaptations will be suggested during Aim 1 and additional peripheral elements may be added by local sites after discussion with the PI through a user-centered design approach.

Site E

Site E will serve as our control group for the study period, operating according to their institutional standard of care (No intervention) while continuing to collect data.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SAMURAI PICU Bundle

The proposed multifaceted SAMURAI PICU Bundle is an intervention with the following core elements: 1) PICU Warning Tool: an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool to provide a non-interruptive interprofessional predictive alert, 2) twice daily safety huddles with unit leadership, and 3) bedside assessment including the care team and patient's family to complete and display a bedside mitigation plan to prevent deterioration. This intervention combines the automated accurate prediction of the PICU Warning Tool with the use of provider intuition or a "gut feeling" from huddles to improve decision making at the bedside. Peripheral elements and possible adaptations will be suggested during Aim 1 and additional peripheral elements may be added by local sites after discussion with the PI through a user-centered design approach.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SAMURAI Bundle

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients admitted to the five PICUs in pediRES-Q during the study period

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maya L Dewan, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comer Children's Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Akron Children's Hospital

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

MUSC Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Richmond

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle Children's

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Molloy MJ, Zackoff M, Gifford A, Hagedorn P, Tegtmeyer K, Britto MT, Dewan M. Usability Testing of Situation Awareness Clinical Decision Support in the Intensive Care Unit. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):327-334. doi: 10.1055/a-2272-6184. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38378044 (View on PubMed)

Gifford A, Butcher B, Chima RS, Moore L, Brady PW, Zackoff MW, Dewan M. Use of design thinking and human factors approach to improve situation awareness in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Hosp Med. 2023 Nov;18(11):978-985. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13216. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37792360 (View on PubMed)

Dewan M, Soberano B, Sosa T, Zackoff M, Hagedorn P, Brady PW, Chima RS, Stalets EL, Moore L, Britto M, Sutton RM, Nadkarni V, Tegtmeyer K, Wolfe H. Assessment of a Situation Awareness Quality Improvement Intervention to Reduce Cardiac Arrests in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):4-12. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002816.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34417417 (View on PubMed)

Soberano BT, Brady P, Yunger T, Jones R, Stoneman E, Sosa T, Stalets EL, Zackoff M, Chima R, Tegtmeyer K, Dewan M. The Effects of Care Team Roles on Situation Awareness in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. J Hosp Med. 2020 Oct;15(10):594-597. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3449.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32853138 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R18HS029630-01

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

SAMURAI_23-021338

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pandemic-Proofing Simulation-based Education
NCT05931679 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA