Median Versus Ulnar Nerve Quantitative Electromyography Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Comparison

NCT ID: NCT06553131

Last Updated: 2026-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-26

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medications used to relax the muscles are used during surgery. The amount of muscle relaxation can monitored with devices that stimulate a specific nerve and evaluate the muscle response. The response to, and recovery from, medications that relax the muscles are best described for a nerve in the arm called the ulnar nerve. The investigators believe that other nerves in the arm, such as the median nerve, could be used to monitor the amount of muscle relaxation. The purpose of this study is to compare the muscle response at two different nerve sites after giving medications to relax the muscles.

This study is going to measure the depth of muscle relaxation during surgery at two different sites. The muscle response to stimulation of the ulnar nerve (located in the arm) will be compared to the muscle response to stimulation of the median nerve (also located in the arm).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single-center prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing ulnar versus median nerve electromyography transmission.

Neuromuscular blockade is used to provide muscle relaxation during surgery. The depth of neuromuscular blockade can be monitored with nerve stimulation or electromyography. The response to and recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade is best described for the ulnar nerve. The investigators postulate that the median nerve may provide comparable information about the response non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Electromyography electrodes will be positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve in one arm and the median nerve in the other arm. The response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade will be compared between the ulnar and median nerve.

The location of median nerve monitoring will be randomized to the dominant or non-dominant hand.

The randomized arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the median nerve and the other arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve (standard site for monitoring neuromuscular transmission during anesthesia).

The purpose of the study is to compare the response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade between the ulnar and median nerves.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromuscular Blockade

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical Patients Receiving Non-Depolarizing Neuromuscular Blockade

Surgical patients having surgery that requires muscle relaxation with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers and monitoring of the depth of muscle blockade.The muscle response to nerve stimulation will be compared between the ulnar and median nerve.

Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

A neuromuscular transmission module connected to electrodes applied to the skin and positioned to provide stimulation of a single nerve and monitor the muscular response to nerve stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring

A neuromuscular transmission module connected to electrodes applied to the skin and positioned to provide stimulation of a single nerve and monitor the muscular response to nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults 18 - 75 years of age who are able to provide consent
* Scheduled for elective surgery requiring muscle relaxation, in a supine position under general anesthesia, with an anticipated duration of at least 1.5 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to rocuronium use
* Comorbidities that may prolong the duration of neuromuscular blockade or alter pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics, such as:
* Neuromuscular disease
* Expected or known difficult airway
* Rocuronium allergy
* BMI \< 18.5 or \> 40
* History of adhesive allergy
* Upper extremity weakness, limb deformity, or absence of all or part of an upper limb
* Patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Benggon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Troesch Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Melissa D McCabe, MD, MSCR

Role: CONTACT

909 558 4475 ext. 44475

Michael Benggon, MD

Role: CONTACT

909 558 4475 ext. 44475

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Melissa M McCabe, MD

Role: primary

909-558-4475

Morgan E Blazy, BS

Role: backup

9095584227 ext. 44256

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Iwasaki H, Yamamoto M, Sato H, Doshu-Kajiura A, Kitajima O, Takagi S, Luthe SK, Suzuki T. A Comparison Between the Adductor Pollicis Muscle Using TOF-Watch SX and the Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscle Using TetraGraph in Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: A Prospective Observational Study. Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2):370-375. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005897. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35061641 (View on PubMed)

Ortiz R, Westenberg RF, Langhammer CG, Knaus WJ, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar 13;7(3):e2155. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002155. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31044121 (View on PubMed)

Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V, Claudius C, Servin F, Klein J, Debaene B, Heeringa M. A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):74-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c3be3c. Epub 2009 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19933538 (View on PubMed)

Lee HJ, Kim KS, Shim JC, Yoon SW. A comparison of the accuracy of ulnar versus median nerve stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 May;60(5):334-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.5.334. Epub 2011 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21716963 (View on PubMed)

Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B, Togashi K, Hulvershorn J. A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Anaesthesia. 2020 Feb;75(2):187-195. doi: 10.1111/anae.14872. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31617199 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 5240163

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EMG-Based Hand-Wrist Control: Study B Mirrored
NCT04692571 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1