Median Versus Ulnar Nerve Quantitative Electromyography Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Comparison
NCT ID: NCT06553131
Last Updated: 2026-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-12-26
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is going to measure the depth of muscle relaxation during surgery at two different sites. The muscle response to stimulation of the ulnar nerve (located in the arm) will be compared to the muscle response to stimulation of the median nerve (also located in the arm).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Neuromobilization on Median Nerve Elasticity
NCT04218175
Performance of Acceleromyography With and Without Preload
NCT00226018
The Role of Lower Limb Neural Mobilization in Improving Balance and Performance
NCT06951048
Efficacy of Combining Movement Representation Techniques to Active Neural Mobilization in the Mechanosensitivity of the Median Nerve in Asymptomatic Volunteers.
NCT07154017
EMG Analysis in ABI: Motor Imagery and Action
NCT06230718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neuromuscular blockade is used to provide muscle relaxation during surgery. The depth of neuromuscular blockade can be monitored with nerve stimulation or electromyography. The response to and recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade is best described for the ulnar nerve. The investigators postulate that the median nerve may provide comparable information about the response non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Electromyography electrodes will be positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve in one arm and the median nerve in the other arm. The response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade will be compared between the ulnar and median nerve.
The location of median nerve monitoring will be randomized to the dominant or non-dominant hand.
The randomized arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the median nerve and the other arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve (standard site for monitoring neuromuscular transmission during anesthesia).
The purpose of the study is to compare the response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade between the ulnar and median nerves.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgical Patients Receiving Non-Depolarizing Neuromuscular Blockade
Surgical patients having surgery that requires muscle relaxation with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers and monitoring of the depth of muscle blockade.The muscle response to nerve stimulation will be compared between the ulnar and median nerve.
Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring
A neuromuscular transmission module connected to electrodes applied to the skin and positioned to provide stimulation of a single nerve and monitor the muscular response to nerve stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring
A neuromuscular transmission module connected to electrodes applied to the skin and positioned to provide stimulation of a single nerve and monitor the muscular response to nerve stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective surgery requiring muscle relaxation, in a supine position under general anesthesia, with an anticipated duration of at least 1.5 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* Comorbidities that may prolong the duration of neuromuscular blockade or alter pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics, such as:
* Neuromuscular disease
* Expected or known difficult airway
* Rocuronium allergy
* BMI \< 18.5 or \> 40
* History of adhesive allergy
* Upper extremity weakness, limb deformity, or absence of all or part of an upper limb
* Patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loma Linda University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Benggon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Loma Linda University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loma Linda University Troesch Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Iwasaki H, Yamamoto M, Sato H, Doshu-Kajiura A, Kitajima O, Takagi S, Luthe SK, Suzuki T. A Comparison Between the Adductor Pollicis Muscle Using TOF-Watch SX and the Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscle Using TetraGraph in Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: A Prospective Observational Study. Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2):370-375. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005897. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
Ortiz R, Westenberg RF, Langhammer CG, Knaus WJ, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar 13;7(3):e2155. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002155. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V, Claudius C, Servin F, Klein J, Debaene B, Heeringa M. A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):74-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c3be3c. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
Lee HJ, Kim KS, Shim JC, Yoon SW. A comparison of the accuracy of ulnar versus median nerve stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 May;60(5):334-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.5.334. Epub 2011 May 31.
Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B, Togashi K, Hulvershorn J. A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Anaesthesia. 2020 Feb;75(2):187-195. doi: 10.1111/anae.14872. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 5240163
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.