Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry)
NCT ID: NCT06551246
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
236 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-27
2027-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In total, 236 children diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Total pharmacological treatment period will be 18 weeks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry)
NCT06465576
Beta 3 Agonists in Treatment of Non-neurogenic Voiding Dysfunction in Children
NCT05240456
A Study to Assess the Long Term Effect, Safety and Metabolism of a Solifenacin Liquid Suspension in Participants 5 to 18 Years of Age With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
NCT01565694
A Clinical Study to Investigate How Solifenacin Fluid is Taken up, How Long it Stays in the Body and How Effective and Safe it is in Treating Children Aged From 6 Months to Less Than 5 Years With Symptoms of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO)
NCT01981954
Open-label Phase 3 Study With Mirabegron in Children From 3 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
NCT02751931
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.
The secondary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses, monotherapy in high dose and monotherapy in low doses as supplementary comparisons. Additionally, the secondary objective is to evaluate side effects, safety, and tolerability of the medical treatment as well as the effect of treatment on well-being and quality of life.
Study design: The BeDry study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Included children will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence refractory to standard urotherapy will be randomized. Initially two groups will receive solifenacin 5 mg and two groups will receive mirabegron 25 mg. After 6 weeks, non-complete respondsers will receive add-on treatment according to their primary randomization group; group 1A will reviece solifenacin 5 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg, group 1B will receive solifenacin 5 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2A will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2B will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg. Total treatment period will be 18 weeks. The primary endpoint measure is treatment response assessed by change from visit 2 to end of study, according to number of wet days pr. 7 days by DryPie.
Perspectives: The trial has the potential to optimize medical treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence, to shorten the treatment period, diminish side effects and minimized unnecessary medical expenses.
Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy, medical treatment or withdrawal. No risks are expected by the clinical examination and paraclinical measurements. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study is approved by the authorities. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-210-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23829). The study is registered and authorized at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg
Group 1A: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.
Solifenacin
According to randomization.
Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on mirabegron 25 mg
Group 1B: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.
Solifenacin
According to randomization.
Mirabegron
According to randomization.
Mirabegron 25 mg + ad-on mirabegron 25 mg
Group 2A: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.
Mirabegron
According to randomization.
Mirabegron 25 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg
Group 2B: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.
Solifenacin
According to randomization.
Mirabegron
According to randomization.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Solifenacin
According to randomization.
Mirabegron
According to randomization.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 5 to 14 years (inclusive) at the time of inclusion.
3. Overactive bladder as per International Children's Continence Society criteria
4. At least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes per week
5. Inadequate effect of at least 4 weeks urotherapy (non-pharmacological treatment)
6. No previous treatment with solifenacin, mirabegron or bladder/sphincter botulinum toxin injections
7. No current constipation as per ROME IV criteria or fecal incontinence (laxative treatment is accepted)
8. Per investigator's judgment, the participant can swallow or can learn to swallow study medication
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to study medication
3. Any contraindication to the use of the study medication
4. Known urogenital anatomical abnormalities affecting lower urinary tract function
5. Known kidney or bladder stones
6. Known diabetes insipidus
7. Ongoing symptomatic urinary tract infection
8. Recurrent urinary tract infection or ongoing prophylactic antibiotic treatment
9. Known QTc prolongation, QTc \>460 ms, or risk of QTc prolongation (hypokalaemia, exercise-induced syncope, or familial long QT syndrome)
10. Other significant electrocardiogram abnormalities
11. Known hypertension
12. ≤3 daily voiding, evaluated by 48-hour frequency-volume chart
13. Uroflowmetry suggestive of other pathology than overactive bladder (staccato-shaped, interrupted-shaped, or plateau-shaped curve)
14. Post-void residual \>50 ml after double voiding
15. Dipstick haematuria (≥2+ erythrocytes) or macroscopic haematuria
16. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
17. Female subjects of childbearing potential
18. Ongoing constipation according to Rome IV-criteria which is intractable to medication or fecal incontinence
19. Inability to swallow study medication
20. Use of any medication during study period, except permitted medication
5 Years
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luise Borch, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Esbjerg Hospital
Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital
Herning, Herning, Denmark
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Kolding Hospital
Kolding, Kolding, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Svendsen AM, Hagstrom S, Thorsteinsson K, Van Batavia J, Kamperis K, Olesen AE, Borch L. Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron, and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry): Protocol for a Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e63588. doi: 10.2196/63588.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BeDry
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.