Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry)

NCT ID: NCT06551246

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

236 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-27

Study Completion Date

2027-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.

In total, 236 children diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Total pharmacological treatment period will be 18 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: According to International Children's Continence Society, first-line treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence is standard urotherapy, eventually followed by pharmacotherapy of anticholinergics. The effect of medical treatment is sparsely investigated and primarily in non-randomized trials.

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.

The secondary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses, monotherapy in high dose and monotherapy in low doses as supplementary comparisons. Additionally, the secondary objective is to evaluate side effects, safety, and tolerability of the medical treatment as well as the effect of treatment on well-being and quality of life.

Study design: The BeDry study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Included children will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence refractory to standard urotherapy will be randomized. Initially two groups will receive solifenacin 5 mg and two groups will receive mirabegron 25 mg. After 6 weeks, non-complete respondsers will receive add-on treatment according to their primary randomization group; group 1A will reviece solifenacin 5 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg, group 1B will receive solifenacin 5 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2A will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2B will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg. Total treatment period will be 18 weeks. The primary endpoint measure is treatment response assessed by change from visit 2 to end of study, according to number of wet days pr. 7 days by DryPie.

Perspectives: The trial has the potential to optimize medical treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence, to shorten the treatment period, diminish side effects and minimized unnecessary medical expenses.

Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy, medical treatment or withdrawal. No risks are expected by the clinical examination and paraclinical measurements. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study is approved by the authorities. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-210-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23829). The study is registered and authorized at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Incontinence in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence refractory to standard urotherapy will be randomized to four treatment groups, randomization 1:1:1:1.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The study is single-blinded, and the study subject will receive medication delivered from the study site. The investigator does not know which treatment the individual participant receives. Participants will be informed that they are not allowed to reveal the blinded investigator the study medication, and an unblinded nurse will guide and answer questions to participants in case of dose titration.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg

Group 1A: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on mirabegron 25 mg

Group 1B: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Mirabegron 25 mg + ad-on mirabegron 25 mg

Group 2A: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Mirabegron 25 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg

Group 2B: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

According to randomization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Solifenacin

According to randomization.

Intervention Type DRUG

Mirabegron

According to randomization.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The participants custody holder(s) must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific procedures.
2. Age 5 to 14 years (inclusive) at the time of inclusion.
3. Overactive bladder as per International Children's Continence Society criteria
4. At least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes per week
5. Inadequate effect of at least 4 weeks urotherapy (non-pharmacological treatment)
6. No previous treatment with solifenacin, mirabegron or bladder/sphincter botulinum toxin injections
7. No current constipation as per ROME IV criteria or fecal incontinence (laxative treatment is accepted)
8. Per investigator's judgment, the participant can swallow or can learn to swallow study medication

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inability of the patent(s) or legal guardian(s) to understand the Danish written and oral information
2. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to study medication
3. Any contraindication to the use of the study medication
4. Known urogenital anatomical abnormalities affecting lower urinary tract function
5. Known kidney or bladder stones
6. Known diabetes insipidus
7. Ongoing symptomatic urinary tract infection
8. Recurrent urinary tract infection or ongoing prophylactic antibiotic treatment
9. Known QTc prolongation, QTc \>460 ms, or risk of QTc prolongation (hypokalaemia, exercise-induced syncope, or familial long QT syndrome)
10. Other significant electrocardiogram abnormalities
11. Known hypertension
12. ≤3 daily voiding, evaluated by 48-hour frequency-volume chart
13. Uroflowmetry suggestive of other pathology than overactive bladder (staccato-shaped, interrupted-shaped, or plateau-shaped curve)
14. Post-void residual \>50 ml after double voiding
15. Dipstick haematuria (≥2+ erythrocytes) or macroscopic haematuria
16. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
17. Female subjects of childbearing potential
18. Ongoing constipation according to Rome IV-criteria which is intractable to medication or fecal incontinence
19. Inability to swallow study medication
20. Use of any medication during study period, except permitted medication
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Esbjerg Hospital

Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Herning, Herning, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Kolding Hospital

Kolding, Kolding, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD

Role: CONTACT

+45 78430408

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+45 78433654

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Søren Hagstrøm, Professor

Role: primary

+45 97663374

Konstantinos Kamperis, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Linda Kuhne-Qvist, MD

Role: primary

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+45 78433654

Louise Winding, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Svendsen AM, Hagstrom S, Thorsteinsson K, Van Batavia J, Kamperis K, Olesen AE, Borch L. Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron, and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry): Protocol for a Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e63588. doi: 10.2196/63588.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40570329 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BeDry

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.