Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry)

NCT ID: NCT06465576

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-27

Study Completion Date

2027-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence.

Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with urinary incontinence, treated with pharmacotherapy of solifenacin and/or mirabegron and ready for withdrawal will be randomized 1:1 to either abrupt or gradual withdrawal, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and rationale: The pharmacological handling of pediatric incontinence is considered temporary and withdrawal attempts are recommended after continence has been achieved. There is no generally accepted withdrawal strategy for solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children. Currently, two different withdrawal strategies are being employed in the clinical setting, namely abrupt withdrawal, and gradual withdrawal, wherein the dosage of the drug prescribed is reduced or the interval between dosages given is increased. Studies report on the differences in withdrawal strategies of antidiuretic therapy targeted at enuresis in pediatric populations. Several studies have reported on the application of structured withdrawal of desmopressin, indicating that gradual withdrawal of desmopressin therapy results in prolonged intervals of continence without relapse. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the strategy of withdrawal of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children diagnosed with urinary incontinence that have achieved continence on these pharmaceuticals. Our study is proposed to ensure an evidence-based approach to a withdrawal of strategy for pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with urinary incontinence.

Objectives: The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence. We hypothesize that gradual withdrawal is superior to abrupt withdrawal regarding the risk of recurrence of incontinence.

Study design: This is an open-label prospective randomized trial, allocating participant to each of the three pharmaceutical groups, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving (solifenacin, mirabegron or solifenacin in combination with mirabegron). Within each pharmaceutical group, the participant will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention being compared; either abrupt withdrawal or gradual withdrawal.

Perspectives:The results are expected to influence the withdrawal strategy of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with daytime urinary incontinence.

Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to medical treatment or withdrawal. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study has been approved by the authorities and was initiated in May 2024. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-211-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23833). The study is registered at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Incontinence in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Within each pharmaceutical group, the participant will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention being compared; either abrupt withdrawal or gradual withdrawal.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abrupt withdrawal of solifenacin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Gradual withdrawal of solifenacin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Abrupt withdrawal of mirabegron

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Gradual withdrawal of mirabegron

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Abrupt withdrawal of solifenacin + mirabegron

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin + Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Gradual withdrawal of solifenacin + mirabegron

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin + Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Solifenacin

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Intervention Type DRUG

Mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Intervention Type DRUG

Solifenacin + Mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The participants custody holder(s) must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific procedures.
2. Age 5 to 14 years (inclusive) at the time of signing the consent and inclusion.
3. Diagnose with urinary incontinence as per ICCS criteria.
4. Pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron.
5. Continence has been achieved on pharmacological therapy with solifenacin and/or mirabegron.
6. Previously withdrawal attempts are accepted.
7. Continence remained on the same dosage of medication for a minimum of three months.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inability of the patent(s) or parental custody holder(s) to understand the Danish written and oral information.
2. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (neurogenic bladder)
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Esbjerg Hospital

Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Herning, Herning, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Kolding Hospital

Kolding, Kolding, Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD

Role: CONTACT

+45 78430408

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+45 78433654

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Søren Hagstrøm, Professor

Role: primary

+45 97663374

Konstantinos Kamperis, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Linda Kuhne-Qvist, MD

Role: primary

Luise Borch, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+45 78433654

Louise Winding, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Svendsen AM, Hagstrom S, Kamperis K, Andersen AE, Henneberg NC, Van Batavia J, Olesen AE, Borch L. Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry): Protocol for an Open-Label Prospective Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 9;14:e63226. doi: 10.2196/63226.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40633093 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

StayDry

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Desmopressin Response in the Young
NCT00230594 COMPLETED PHASE3