Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcomes in Adhesive Strip Versus Suture Repair for Simple Facial Lacerations
NCT ID: NCT06550999
Last Updated: 2026-02-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-08-31
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Sutures have traditionally been used to close wounds in various types of tissue, and it is still very commonly used in the clinical setting. Adhesive strips (also known under the brand names of Steri-Strips, Curi-strips, Nichi-Strips, and Suture Strips) are another method to repair lacerations superficially. Due to their superficial application and ease of use, adhesive strips may help minimize scar formation and may result in less pain and complications for the patient when compared to conventional sutures.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine whether repair of small, simple facial lacerations with adhesive strips results in better patient experiences and better cosmetic outcomes than sutures. The investigators hypothesize that wounds repaired with adhesive strip will have higher patient satisfaction scores and better cosmetic outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
NCT01918059
Adhesive Strips in Dermatologic Surgery: Is Cosmetic Appearance Improved?
NCT01979497
Facial Lacerations Repaired With Dermabond Compared With Dermabond With Underlying Steristrips in Pediatric Patients
NCT03685565
Suturing vs Biological Adhesive in Simple Lacerations of Hand
NCT00524888
Aesthetic Outcome of Layered Closure vs. Layered Closure Followed by 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate
NCT05449457
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After randomization to their respective laceration repair group, patients will be surveyed by the study team to assess their experience, satisfaction, and pain scores during the laceration repair. Approximately two months after their initial laceration repair, the patients will be contacted securely via phone call or email to assess if they had any complications and to assess their satisfaction and cosmetic rating of their laceration scar. Additionally, the subjects will be instructed to take pictures and/or videos of their scar and send it securely to the study team via UCI Epic MyChart (or a HIPAA-compliant encrypted email if MyChart is unavailable). These photos and videos will be de-identified and stored securely on a password-encrypted folder where a blinded evaluator will score the scars with a validated scar assessment tool. Patients will be instructed to only take photos/videos of their scar area and not any other major areas of their face that can be identified. Following the conclusion of the study, all patient identifiers and photos/videos will be destroyed to preserve patient privacy.
All survey data will be collected and entered into a REDCap database. Data collection will include demographics, phone/email contact information, patient satisfaction scores with the laceration repair, patient pain scores, patient scar cosmetic rating, presence of complications, and patient responses to questions about their general experience during the laceration repair and healing time period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adhesive strip repair
In this arm, patients will have their facial laceration properly cleaned and repaired with adhesive strips.
Laceration repair with adhesive strips
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with adhesive strips
Suture repair
In this arm, patients will have their facial laceration properly cleaned and repaired with sutures of any material.
Laceration repair with sutures
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with sutures
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laceration repair with adhesive strips
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with adhesive strips
Laceration repair with sutures
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with sutures
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Small (\<2.5 cm) and simple facial lacerations requiring repair
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant females
* Incarcerated individuals
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffry Nahmias, MD
Health Sciences Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffry Nahmias, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Irvine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Irvine
Orange, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4338
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.