Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Facial Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT01514084
Last Updated: 2014-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-02-29
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research Questions
1. What is the association between wound characteristics, wound management in the ED, patient satisfaction in the ED, and patient-rated cosmetic appearance of sutured wounds?
2. Is there a difference noted among ED providers with different levels of training?
3. Is there an association between initial satisfaction scores and wound outcome?
4. Is there an association between short term and long term wound scores?
Design This is a non-randomized, prospective, observational study of patients who present to the ED seeking treatment for facial laceration repair.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
NCT01918059
Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
NCT03080467
Cosmetic Outcome at 4 Months in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative Versus Suture Repair
NCT03321721
Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcomes in Adhesive Strip Versus Suture Repair for Simple Facial Lacerations
NCT06550999
Aesthetic Outcome of Layered Closure vs. Layered Closure Followed by 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate
NCT05449457
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEM group
Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by PEM trained physicians.
No interventions assigned to this group
GP group
Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by general pediatricians.
No interventions assigned to this group
PNP group
Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by PNPs.
No interventions assigned to this group
RN group
Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by suture RNs.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Their child seeking treatment is less than 18 years of age
* The laceration was sustained less than 12 hours prior to presentation to Children's ED
* They speak English
Exclusion Criteria
* Are medically complex children
* Have a history of pre-existing coagulopathy or collagen vascular disease
* Have a history of immunodeficiency or diabetes mellitus
* Are suspected of non-accidental trauma
* Have wounds that could be approximated by tissue adhesives
* Have animal or human bites
* Have gross contamination
* Have puncture wounds
* Have lacerations of tendon/nerve/cartilage
* Have scalp lacerations
* Do not speak English
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Twin Cities, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Quinn JV, Wells GA. An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(6):583-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02465.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1108-081
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.