Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Facial Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT01514084

Last Updated: 2014-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Facial lacerations are commonly treated in the emergency department. The nature of the injury leads to a great deal of concern about the long-term cosmetic appearance of the wounds.

Research Questions

1. What is the association between wound characteristics, wound management in the ED, patient satisfaction in the ED, and patient-rated cosmetic appearance of sutured wounds?
2. Is there a difference noted among ED providers with different levels of training?
3. Is there an association between initial satisfaction scores and wound outcome?
4. Is there an association between short term and long term wound scores?

Design This is a non-randomized, prospective, observational study of patients who present to the ED seeking treatment for facial laceration repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Facial Lacerations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEM group

Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by PEM trained physicians.

No interventions assigned to this group

GP group

Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by general pediatricians.

No interventions assigned to this group

PNP group

Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by PNPs.

No interventions assigned to this group

RN group

Patients whose lacerations have been repaired by suture RNs.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Families presenting to the ED for repair of facial laceration will be approached for study inclusion if:

* Their child seeking treatment is less than 18 years of age
* The laceration was sustained less than 12 hours prior to presentation to Children's ED
* They speak English

Exclusion Criteria

* Families presenting to the ED for repair of facial laceration will be excluded from study participation if they:

* Are medically complex children
* Have a history of pre-existing coagulopathy or collagen vascular disease
* Have a history of immunodeficiency or diabetes mellitus
* Are suspected of non-accidental trauma
* Have wounds that could be approximated by tissue adhesives
* Have animal or human bites
* Have gross contamination
* Have puncture wounds
* Have lacerations of tendon/nerve/cartilage
* Have scalp lacerations
* Do not speak English
Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

Twin Cities, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Quinn JV, Wells GA. An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(6):583-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02465.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9660284 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1108-081

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.