Ultrasound Estimation of Gastric Volumes in Patients With Previous Gastric Sleeve
NCT ID: NCT06533046
Last Updated: 2025-02-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
37 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-08-02
2024-11-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Can the existing model accurately calculate gastric volume in patients who have had a previous gastric sleeve procedure?
If the existing model is not accurate in this population, can a model be developed to predict gastric volume in these patients based on ultrasound-measured cross section area?
Participants will be asked to fast prior to presenting for a gastric ultrasound scan. Following a fasted scan, patients will drink a small volume of water and undergo a second gastric scan.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing Gastric Motility and Distention in Postoperative Gastrointestinal Surgery Using Bedside Gastric Ultrasound: Predicting Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia, Ileus, Return of Bowel Function
NCT04747691
Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Content and Volume
NCT02810977
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Gastric Residual Volume
NCT04413474
Estimation of Preoperative Gastric Volume Using Ultrasound
NCT03155776
The Effects of Pharyngeal Packing on the Postoperative Gastric Fluid Volume in Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Nasal Surgery
NCT06957275
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One tool that has been used by anesthesiologists to clarify the risk of a full stomach preoperatively is an estimation of gastric volume using bedside ultrasound. The most commonly utilized method of estimating gastric volume is done by laying the patient in the right lateral decubitus position, measuring the diameter of stomach at the level of the antrum, and estimating a volume using the formula stomach volume (mL) = 27 + 14.6\* antral cross sectional area (cm2) - 1.28\*age (years). Volumes up to 1.5 mL/kg are generally thought to be consistent with baseline gastric secretions, while higher volumes or the presence of solids on ultrasound are indicative of a relatively full stomach and elevated aspiration risk. Gastric ultrasound and this method of estimating volume have been found to be very sensitive and specific for identifying a full stomach including in pregnant and severely obese patients.
Despite the proven accuracy of bedside ultrasound in estimating gastric volume in a variety of populations, all studies in the literature excluded patients who had previous gastric surgeries. There is a single published case study of an attempt to obtain an ultrasound estimate of gastric volume in a patient who had a previous roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This report found that the patient's stomach appeared to be empty on ultrasound regardless of ingested volume because the antrum of the stomach is no longer continuous with the remainder of the gastrointestinal tract after the operation. This is not the case in gastric sleeve procedures in which the greater curvature of the stomach is resected but the flow of material in the tract is left intact. Notably, an estimated 280,000 bariatric procedures were performed in the United States in 2022 with the vast majority of these being gastric sleeves. Given the large and ever increasing population of patients who have had gastric sleeve procedures and the proven utility of gastric ultrasound in assessing appropriate preoperative fasting it is important to determine whether traditional models of estimating gastric volume retain their accuracy in this population.
Participants will be asked to fast from solids for 8 hours and fluids for 2 hours prior to presenting for the study to ensure an empty stomach at baseline. They will be asked to lay on a flat surface on their right side. A curvilinear ultrasound probe will be placed on their abdomen and the antrum of the stomach will be identified with the liver and aorta in view at which point 3 measurements of both the anteroposterior and craniocaudal diameter of the stomach will be taken. These measurements will be used to calculate a gastric volume. Participants will then be asked to drink 100 mL of water. A second set of measurements of the gastric antrum will be obtained within 5 minutes of ingestion of the water as previously described. Serial measurements will be taken at thirty-minute intervals until 2 hours have past since ingestion. Participants will then be asked if they would be willing to repeat the above process at a later date. If they agree to go forward with an additional date, they will be asked to undergo the same process detailed above but with ingestion of 200 mL of water. If they are amenable to presenting a third time they will undergo a final trial with 300 mL of water as described above.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* Previous gastric sleeve procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hiatal hernia
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander Doyal, MD, MPH, FASA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kruisselbrink R, Gharapetian A, Chaparro LE, Ami N, Richler D, Chan VWS, Perlas A. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Gastric Ultrasound. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jan;128(1):89-95. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003372.
Kruisselbrink R, Arzola C, Jackson T, Okrainec A, Chan V, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in severely obese individuals: a validation study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jan;118(1):77-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew400.
Howle R, Sultan P, Shah R, Sceales P, Van de Putte P, Bampoe S. Gastric point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Nov;44:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 29.
Pai SL, Bojaxhi E, Logvinov II, Porter SB, Feinglass NG, Robards CB, Torp KD. Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Volume After Bariatric Surgery: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2019 Jan 1;12(1):1-4. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000824.
Clapp B, Ponce J, Corbett J, Ghanem OM, Kurian M, Rogers AM, Peterson RM, LaMasters T, English WJ. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 May;20(5):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Pequignot F, Bovet M, Jougla E, Lienhart A. Mortality related to anaesthesia in France: analysis of deaths related to airway complications. Anaesthesia. 2009 Apr;64(4):366-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05792.x.
Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017 Mar;126(3):376-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452. No abstract available.
Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, Cubillos J, Chan V. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):357-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Read MS, Vaughan RS. Allowing pre-operative patients to drink: effects on patients' safety and comfort of unlimited oral water until 2 hours before anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Oct;35(7):591-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03354.x.
Phillips S, Hutchinson S, Davidson T. Preoperative drinking does not affect gastric contents. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Jan;70(1):6-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.1.6.
Harter RL, Kelly WB, Kramer MG, Perez CE, Dzwonczyk RR. A comparison of the volume and pH of gastric contents of obese and lean surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):147-52. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00030.
Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, Hellstrom PM, Hammarqvist F, Almstrom C, Lindh A, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1344-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00063.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-1278
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.