Barbed Versus PGA Sutures in Minimally Invasive Dismembered Pyeloplasty

NCT ID: NCT06526559

Last Updated: 2026-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-22

Study Completion Date

2025-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main goals of this trial is to study the feasibility and safety of using barbed sutures compared to the conventional PGA (Polyglactin) sutures in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty. The main questions in using barbed sutures would be:

1. Is it safe with similar post-operative outcomes?
2. Does it have any significant complications?
3. Is it easier to handle intra-operatively?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Minimally invasive surgeries for pelviureteric junction obstruction have become more popular in the past decade than open surgery. This is to decrease the morbidity for patients and attain better patient satisfaction especially for having a significantly smaller incisions compared to open flank and midline abdominal incisions.

Minimally invasive surgery is a term used to describe surgeries that would spare the patient a long incision and hence spares him also the pain and risk of wound infection associated with it. In this study the investigators will focus only on laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgeries.

Pelviureteric junction obstruction is a disease that is not uncommon with an incidence of 1 in 1000-1500. Although usually it is diagnosed in the pediatric population, it is not uncommon in adults. PUJO (Pelviureteric junction obstruction) could have it's impact on the patient's quality of life as if it is not treated it could decrease the split glomerular filtration rate due to impaired drainage. It also could present with secondary renal stones, pain, recurrent upper urinary tract infection, fever and urosepsis.

Management of PUJO (Pelviureteric junction obstruction) starts with the proper assessment of the patient regarding his age and careful history taking and physical examination, evaluation of laboratory investigations such as urine culture and sensitivity, serum creatinine, total leucocytic count. Also, evaluation of the pelviabdominal ultrasound, intravenous pyelography, and diuretic renogram.

Treatment of PUJO (Pelviureteric junction obstruction) ranges from active surveillance, endopyelotomy and ureteral stenting, and pyeloplasty whether it is open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted.

Traditionally, absorbable polyglactin sutures is used for dismembered pyeloplasty. Yet recently barbed sutures have gained popularity within urologists especially in minimally invasive surgeries.

Barbed knotless uni-directional sutures have the benefit of being knotless and evenly distributes tension so there is no need for the assistant to follow the surgeon and stretch the suture, this significantly decreases the operative time and frees the assistant's port to be able to do other steps.

Barbed sutures have been well established in other surgical fields such as bariatric surgery, gynecology, and skin closure previously, and recently it has been populated in the urological community especially in the vesicourethral anastomosis in Radical prostatectomy.

Sparse yet promising articles have been published regarding the use of barbed sutures in pyeloplasty which could change the way surgeons approach the disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvi-Ureteric Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomization is done using a web-based platform, group assignment will only be known to the surgeon (care provider). It would be concealed to the patient, investigator, and outcomes assessor

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Barbed suture group

Pyeloplasty done using barbed absorbable sutures

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Barbed suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of two absorbable barbed sutures for each arm in the ureteropelvic anastomosis in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty

PGA group

Pyeloplasty done using conventional PGA (Polyglactin) sutures

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PGA suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of two absorbable polyglactin sutures for each arm in the ureteropelvic anastomosis in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Barbed suture

Use of two absorbable barbed sutures for each arm in the ureteropelvic anastomosis in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

PGA suture

Use of two absorbable polyglactin sutures for each arm in the ureteropelvic anastomosis in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

V-Loc Vicryl

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 to 60 undergoing robotic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty
* History of dietls' crisis (Fever, pain) in a pelviureteric junction obstructed kidney
* Decrease in glomerular filtration rate in a pelviureteric junction obstructed kidney

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications for laparoscopy or robotic surgery as pulmonary obstructive or restrictive disease, and poor cardiovascular fitness
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* Morbid obesity
* History of multiple major abdominal surgeries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Fakhry Makki

Urology Specialist in Cairo University Hospital, Principal investigator, MD Candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Waleed Ghoneima, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor - Urology Department - Reconstructive Urology Unit Cairo University

Ayman Kassem, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistant Professor - Urology Department - Oncology Unit - Cairo University

Mohammed Elghorably

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer - Urology Department - King Fahd Hospital - Cairo University

Ahmed Sharawy, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer - Urology Department - King Fahd Hospital - Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University Kasr AlAiny Hospitals Urology Department 17B

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shah HN, Nayyar R, Rajamahanty S, Hemal AK. Prospective evaluation of unidirectional barbed suture for various indications in surgeon-controlled robotic reconstructive urologic surgery: Wake Forest University experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):775-85. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0075-y. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22057590 (View on PubMed)

Anand S, Jukic M, Krishnan N, Pogorelic Z. Barbed Versus Non-Barbed Suture for Pyeloplasty via the Minimally Invasive Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1056-1063. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0868. Epub 2022 May 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35549514 (View on PubMed)

Giri V, Yadav SS, Tomar V, Jha AK, Garg A. Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed suture versus nonbarbed suture: A single-center experience. Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):410-413. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_123_15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31649463 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MD-439-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PRP Gel in Wound Closure in Recurrent CS
NCT02775747 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05760794 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA