Failure Factors of ERCP After Gastrointestinal Reconstruction and Effectiveness Analysis of Remedial Measures
NCT ID: NCT06512246
Last Updated: 2024-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
195 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-01
2024-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nonradiation-to-endoscopist Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Complexity Level I/II
NCT02697149
Evaluation of the Impact of a Forward Viewing Scope at Time of ERCP
NCT05627882
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Combine With Laparoscopic Regional Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02325999
Clinical Outcomes of the Endoscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions
NCT01750619
Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Intestinal Failure Patients
NCT07172711
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For normal upper digestive tract anatomy, the technical success rate of ERCP was 97.6% and the treatment success rate was 95.2%. But when the upper GI tract anatomy is altered due to surgery, standard ERCP is operationally challenging and sometimes impossible. For the treatment of gastroduodenal malignant tumors, obesity and peptic ulcer, subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy are often used in combination with gastrointestinal reconstruction. The most common gastrointestinal reconstruction procedures include Billroth I, Billroth II, Roux-en-Y and so on. Billroth I is a gastroduodenal anastomosis, which is more consistent with the original physiological condition of the gastrointestinal tract, and usually does not increase the difficulty of ERCP operation. Billroth II closed the duodenal end and anastomosed the stomach and jejunum to form an input loop and an output loop behind the gastrointestinal anastomosis. Roux-en-Y is to close the duodenal end and transect the jejunum with Treitz ligament at a distance of 10-15cm. The distal end is anastomosed with the remnant stomach, and the proximal end is anastomosed with the jejunum at a distance of 45-60cm from the gastrointestinal anastomosis. Due to the change of gastrointestinal structure after gastrointestinal reconstruction, patients may be complicated with cholelithiasis, pancreaticobile duct stenosis and other diseases, requiring ERCP to assist in diagnosis and treatment. However, the alteration of digestive tract anatomical structure and possible postoperative complications, including anastomotic fistula and anastomotic stenosis, may lead to certain difficulty in ERCP operation. The success of ERCP includes the success of ERCP implantation, ERCP intubation and ERCP treatment. According to previous studies at home and abroad, the relevant success rates of ERCP after gastrointestinal reconstruction are 82.3%-90.5%, 77.5%-88.6% and 46.3%-88.6%, respectively. Current studies suggest that the gastrointestinal remodeling procedure, the type of operating endoscope, and the experience of operating physicians are related to the success rate of ERCP operation. When ERCP fails, it can be treated with ERCP again, percutaneous hepatic puncture biliary drainage (PTCD), endoscopic ultrasound, and surgery.
In a retrospective analysis, 195 patients with gastrointestinal reconstruction, who treated with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Beijing Friendship Hospital were studied. The investigators assessed the outcomes of failure factors of ERCP and effectiveness of remedial measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* After gastrointestinal reconstruction (Billroth Ⅱ Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y Anastomosis).
* Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed for common bile duct stone with choledocholithiasis, pancreatic duct stenosis, or obstructive jaundice with endoscopic indication.
Exclusion Criteria
* Accompanied by serious cardiopulmonary disease or coagulation dysfunction.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Friendship Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fujing Lv
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BFHHZS20240136
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.