Efficacy of Single Use Disposable Elevator Cap (DEC) Duodenoscopy
NCT ID: NCT05800171
Last Updated: 2023-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
5000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-24
2025-02-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question it aims to answer are:
* Is the single use disposable elevator cap duodenoscope more effective in preventing cholangitis caused by MDR than fixed cap duodeoscope?
* Is the single use disposable elevator cap duodenoscope more effective in preventing severe cholangitis than fixed cap duodenoscope?
Participants will undergo and ERCP procedure. Among the patients who received the procedure, those who developed cholangitis after procedure will treated with antibiotics after blood culture test. The result of the post procedure cholangitis group's blood culture test and lab data including LFT will be collected. Researches will compare single use disposable elevator cap duodenoscope group and fixed distal cap duodenoscope group to see if there is difference in the incidence of cholangitis caused by MDR pathogens.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multibending vs Conventional Endoscope for Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy
NCT02189421
Detachable String Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy for Completely Viewing of Esophagus and Stomach
NCT03457909
Efficacy and Safety Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer
NCT01132469
Evaluation of the Impact of a Forward Viewing Scope at Time of ERCP
NCT05627882
A Study on Precutting Methods of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms Located at Lesser Curvature Side of Antrum
NCT02245971
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We conducted a prospective non-randomized cohort study in a single institution comparing baseline characteristics, technical performance, and incidence of acute cholangitis, including MDR pathogen, in 95 patients using a standard duodenoscope and 101 patients using a DEC duodenoscope.
Age, sex, comorbidities, and indication for ERCP were similar between the two groups. However, the standard duodenoscope group had a higher proportion of naïve papilla (51% vs. 34%, p = 0.04), while the technical success rate was slightly higher in the DEC duodenoscope group (95% vs. 85%, p = 0.15). The rates of procedure-related adverse events were similar between the two groups (16% for DEC vs. 15% for standard). The incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis was also similar (10% for DEC vs. 11% for standard, p = 0.90). The proportion of post-ERCP cholangitis caused by MDR pathogens was similar in the two groups (1% for DEC vs. 2% for standard, p = 0.39).
This study suggests that the technical performance of the DEC duodenoscope is similar to that of the standard duodenoscope. However, more clinical data are needed to confirm the efficacy of the DEC duodenoscope in preventing ERCP-related infection transmission.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 19 years age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient who already confirmed of multidrug resistant bacterial infection
* Pregnant women
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Myeong Hwan Lee, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seoul National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2301-097-1396
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.