Measuring the Concurrent Validity of the Upper Limb Use Ratio With Accelerometers in an Ecological Situation After Stroke.
NCT ID: NCT06509542
Last Updated: 2024-10-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-07
2026-04-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Actimetry Monitoring of the Paretic Upper Limb in Chronic Post Stroke.
NCT05581602
Evolution of the Patient's Perception of the Use of the Upper Limb After a Stroke During Intensive Rehabilitation
NCT06569771
Effectiveness of Intensive Training in Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke.
NCT06571292
Biomarkers to Predict Gain From Therapy in Motor Stroke
NCT03739892
An Algorithm for Prognosis of Upper Limb Paresis in Patients With Subacute Stroke
NCT03632499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Measure of FuncUseRatio using wrist-worn accelerometers and videos
The wristbands are made from hypoallergenic silicone and weigh 27 grams. They contain three accelerometers (AX3, Axivity, Newcastle Helix, United Kingdom), recording data in the three planes of space at a sampling frequency of 50 Hz and within an acceleration range of ±8 g. The wristbands will be worn on each wrist during the activities.
Two high-definition video cameras, recording at least 50 images per second, will be positioned so that the movements of the patient's upper limbs are always visible. The location of the cameras will depend on the activity and the configuration of the room in which it takes place.
Objective assessment of upper limb use during activities in ecological situation
Twenty-five patients will be recorded performing three activities during their rehabilitation: getting dressed, preparing a meal, and eating a meal. The movements of their upper limbs will be tracked using wrist-worn accelerometers and video cameras.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Objective assessment of upper limb use during activities in ecological situation
Twenty-five patients will be recorded performing three activities during their rehabilitation: getting dressed, preparing a meal, and eating a meal. The movements of their upper limbs will be tracked using wrist-worn accelerometers and video cameras.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject participating in ecological activities during occupational therapy sessions
* Adult subject aged 18 or over
* Subject informed of study participation and not objecting to participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or breast-feeding woman,
* Failure to obtain consent,
* Non-affiliation with a social security scheme,
* Persons under court protection,
* Person protected by law (under guardianship or curatorship)
* Participant in another research project with an exclusion period still ongoing.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Paul Coste Floret Hospital
UNKNOWN
Université Montpellier
OTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH Paul Coste Floret
Lamalou-les-Bains, , France
CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Faity G, Mottet D, Pla S, Froger J. The reserve of joint torque determines movement coordination. Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):23008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02338-4.
Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):969-78. doi: 10.1177/1545968315583720. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Chen S, Wolf SL, Zhang Q, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ. Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):507-14. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425048. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
Dusfour G, Mottet D, Muthalib M, Laffont I, Bakhti K. Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Apr 27;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y.
Leuenberger K, Gonzenbach R, Wachter S, Luft A, Gassert R. A method to qualitatively assess arm use in stroke survivors in the home environment. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Jan;55(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1496-7. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS. Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jan;25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1177/1545968310370748. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
Noorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Oct 9;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-144.
Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jun;19(4):404-11. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions. Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S6-S16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
Schambra HM, Parnandi A, Pandit NG, Uddin J, Wirtanen A, Nilsen DM. A Taxonomy of Functional Upper Extremity Motion. Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 20;10:857. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00857. eCollection 2019.
Smith BA, Lang CE. Sensor Measures of Symmetry Quantify Upper Limb Movement in the Natural Environment Across the Lifespan. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1176-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12):1726-31. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35660.
Stewart JC, Gordon J, Winstein CJ. Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke: kinematic differences based on side of brain damage. Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2407-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3938-5. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
Uswatte G, Hobbs Qadri L. A behavioral observation system for quantifying arm activity in daily life after stroke. Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Nov;54(4):398-403. doi: 10.1037/a0017501.
Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006 Oct 10;67(7):1189-94. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
Zhou L, Fischer E, Tunca C, Brahms CM, Ersoy C, Granacher U, Arnrich B. How We Found Our IMU: Guidelines to IMU Selection and a Comparison of Seven IMUs for Pervasive Healthcare Applications. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 22;20(15):4090. doi: 10.3390/s20154090.
Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3972-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.5466. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL23_0428
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.