Safety Plan in Emergency Department to Prevent Suicidal Attempt Recidive
NCT ID: NCT06499337
Last Updated: 2024-07-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-01
2024-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Since years 2000, a series of preventative interventions have been developed to reduce suicide risk, with perhaps the most widely used is suicide safety planning. Several studies showed positive results after evaluating the efficacy of suicide safety planning for reducing patient risk. However, this intervention hasn't been yet evaluated in French emergency department settings.
Safety planning is a collaborative intervention between a therapist and the patient, by which a series of preventive actions are planned in the event patient experiences suicide ideation. Patients are provided with a paper form of the completed safety plan, including the following: personal warning signs, self-management strategies, reasons for living, social supports, and crisis supports.
In this study, we aim to assess the feasability and the acceptabilty of using the safety plan among patients hospitalised in a short-term unit, after an emergency department admission for suicidal attempt.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Recurrence of Suicide Attempt by Adolescent by Sending SMS (MEDIACONNEX)
NCT02762734
Evaluation of Medical Care and Patient's Knowledge About the Behavior to Take on Secondary Prevention of Anaphylaxis
NCT03953482
PilBouTox® Project: Button Battery Poisoning From Data Collected by French Poison Control Centres
NCT03708250
Specified Drug-use Survey of Fomepizole Intravenous Infusion (All-case Surveillance)
NCT02415712
Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to Suxamethonium During ECT on the Sensitization to NMBA and the Development of Protective Antibodies
NCT05210062
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since years 2000, a series of preventative interventions have been developed to reduce suicide risk, with perhaps the most widely used is suicide safety planning, which is a brief intervention to help individuals who survived a suicide attempt to develop a set of tools and steps, to reduce the likelihood of engaging in suicidal behaviour. Several studies showed positive results after evaluating the efficacy of suicide safety planning for reducing patient risk. Recently, a systematic review concluded that Safety Planning is a valuable intervention for patients experiencing suicide-related distress, and was associated with improvements in suicidal ideation and behaviour and reductions in hospitalizations. Qualitative studies suggest a Safety Planning intervention is acceptable and feasible, as well as adaptable to the clinical area in its modality and delivery. Despite positive outcomes, this intervention has not been fully evaluated in French settings. A previous study concluded it was not adapted to emergency department due to a lack of time or available exam rooms for professionals to conduct the intervention. Therefore, in our study, participants will be recruited in a post-ED unit, where patients are monitored for maximum 72 hours, before being discharged home or transferred to hospital facilities.
Safety planning is a collaborative intervention between a healthcare worker and the patient, by which a series of preventive actions are planned in the event patient experiences suicide ideation. Safety planning included identifying: 1) warning signs or triggers that indicate suicide ideation is likely to occur, 2) internal coping strategies (e.g., distracting activities) for use when those triggers occur or when experiencing suicide ideation, 3) social contacts for further distraction or social locations that may provide distraction, 4) supportive contacts (who can provide assistance), 5) emergency resources (e.g., therapist phone numbers, hotlines, local hospital emergency room locations), and also included steps to ensure the safety of the home environment that minimize the patient's ability to act on suicidal thoughts or urges (i.e., reducing access to lethal means).
In this study, Safety plan was delivered face-to-face, during the post-ED stay; upon discharge, participants were provided with the paper-based plan they completed with their physician.
The main outcome of our study was to evaluate the feasibility - assessed by healthcare workers- and the acceptability - from patients' point of view- of conducting a Safety plan in a post-ED setting, after suicidal attempt. Secondary outcomes included to evaluate Safety plan utility, assessed by patients based on their use or not of the Safety plan at 1 and 6 months after inclusion, and its efficacy, on the recurrence of suicidal attempt over the 6 months after inclusion.
To evaluate the outcomes at 1 and 6 months, patients were recontacted by a psychologist to complete a brief questionnaire over the phone.
At baseline, we also collected sociodemographics information, including marital status and living situation; patients completed the Hospital anxiety and depression scale, and suicidal ideations evaluated with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients hospitalised in a post-emergency unit following a suicidal attempt
Exclusion Criteria
* Pattients whose clinical state or French level prevent to participate to the Safety plan intervention
* patients who do not agree to participate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Ganay M, Duroy D, Perozziello A, Lejoyeux M, Geoffroy PA. Study assessing the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Safety Plan for suicide prevention in a French emergency department. Encephale. 2023 Dec;49(6):656-657. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Apr 28. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D21_PEPI-0011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.