Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-25
2028-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will go through total hip arthroplasty, and be followed by CT-RSA, plain x-rays and patients reported outcome measures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Restoration Anatomic Acetabular Shell Revision Study
NCT05591859
Prospective Follow-up of the Prevision Hip Stem With Comparison of Different Implant Variants
NCT06626490
Anatomical Femoral Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04243980
EU Safety and Efficacy Study Regarding the R3 Acetabular Hip System
NCT04399928
Exception Cementless Hip Stem
NCT04349046
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to compare implant migration and early fixation of a hybrid hip replacement combining the uncemented ACE acetabular component and the cemented Avanteon femoral stem, by using CT based Radiostereometric Analysis, a new innovative method for evaluating implant migration. Our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used. This will be the first ever CT-RSA study in Norway and one of the first world-wide, evaluating hip implants.
Radiostereometric analysis RSA is a method used to measure implant migration and micromotion after joint replacement surgery, with high precision and accuracy. It is considered the gold standard for to assess migration in orthopedic implants. Early implant migration predicts later loosening, and failure of the implant. Subsidence of the femoral stem of more than 1.2 mm at 24m months is predictive of revision. Proximal migration of the acetabular component of up to 0.2mm is considered acceptable, 0.2-1mm is considered at risk, and above 1mm is unacceptable. RSA is thereby used as an early measure of longevity and durability of new implants. However, RSA is an expensive and time consuming procedure. It requires special equipment such as RSA cages, software, and special x-ray setup. It also requires specially trained personnel to do the examination. Loss of data due to occlusion of tantalum beads from metallic implants, is unavoidable in RSA. Over the last years CT-RSA has evolved to overcome some of the challenges of RSA. CT-RSA has been validated to have similar or even higher precision and accuracy than RSA in both hip and knee implant analysis.By using CT-RSA we can evaluate implant migration without the need for implant or bone markers, by using bone surface anatomy. One of the authors (FDØ) has recently shown that a vast decrease of effective radiation doses of CT-RSA in total knee arthroplasty yields equal precision in a cadaver study (publication in press). We assume this applies to CT-RSA of the hip as well. We therefore would like to perform a study on ultra low dose CT-RSA of hip implants, to evaluate the precision. This could have a major impact for future CT-RSA studies of the hip, since we potentially could reduce the effective radiation dose.
Previous cadaveric studies have shown that screw fixation increases initial stability of acetabular components. In long term, press-fit screwless fixation achieve sufficient stability.The use of augmented screw fixation may increase the risk of particle debris and osteolysis around the acetabular component. The use of ancillary screw fixation may thereby increase the risk of loosening, and need for major revision surgery. There is also a risk for iatrogenic damage to nearby vessels and pelvic organs, due to screw misplacement.
The Avanteon JRI is a highly polished double tapered femoral stem, designed by force-closed principles. The stem is intended to subside gradually in the cement mantle over time. Highly polished femoral stems have shown excellent results, and lower revision rates compared to shape-closed design stems. New implants are developed to increase early fixation and long term survival, to avoid the need for revision surgery.
In the field of orthopedic surgery, our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used, and thereby contributing to the goal of life-long lasting implants. This will also contribute to lower the need for revision surgery, avoiding the risk of major complications for our patients. The economic impact off revision surgery is of great concern for both the patient and the society, and avoiding the need for revision arthroplasty is of economic importance.
Research questions and goals In our study we will evaluate the migration of the Avanteon femoral stem using CT-RSA, to predict long-term survival. We will also evaluate the role of ancillary screw fixation of the new ACE acetabular component by using CT-RSA, to see if ancillary screw fixation increases stability of the implant. By using a patient attached accelerometer-based activity monitor ActivePAL, we can measure patient activity to see if the screw fixation has any effect on activity levels.
Hypotheses; Article 1
* H0-hypothesis; subsidence of the Avanteon femoral stem is less than 1.2mm at 24 months
* H1-hypothesis; subsidence of the Avanteon femoral stem is more than 1.2mm at 24 months
Article 2
* H0-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component does not increase stability of the implant
* H1-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component increases stability of the implant
Article 3
* H0-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component does not increase patient activity
* H1-hypothesis; ancillary screw fixation of the ACE acetabular component increases patient activity
Article 4
* H0-hypothesis; reducing the effective radiation dose does not reduce the precision of CT-RSA of hip implants
* H1-hypothesis; reducing the effective radiation dose reduce the precision of CT-RSA of hip implants
Short term goals;
* Demonstrating the stability and migration of the Avanteon femoral stem
* Evaluate the stability and migration of the ACE acetabular component with and without ancillary screw fixation
* Demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of the ACE acetabular component and Avanteon femoral stem
* Demonstrate the effect of acetabular screw fixation on patient activity levels in the postoperative period Demonstrate the precision of ultra low dose CT-RSA Long term goals;
* Contributing to the development of longer lasting hip replacement implants
* Evaluate the increase in activity levels after hip replacement surgery
Results expected to be achieved during the project period;
* Establishing the new innovative CT-RSA as a method for hip implant migration analysis in Norway
* Develop recommendation for the routine use of ancillary screw fixation of acetabular components
This is a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients referred will be evaluated for inclusion consecutively from the outpatient clinic of the research department at Kristiansund hospital.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ancillary screw group
Patients with ancillary screw fixation acetabular component
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Surgery for total hip replacement
Without ancillary screws group
No ancillary screws in acetabular component
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Surgery for total hip replacement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Surgery for total hip replacement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients requiring primary total hip replacement
* Patients who understand the conditions of the study, are willing to, and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who require revision hip arthroplasty
* Patients who have had a previous osteotomy or osteosynthesis of the femur or acetabulum
* Patients with metabolic bone disease, other than osteoporosis
* Patients with inflammatory arthritis
* Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living (BMI \> 40)
* Patients with active or suspected infection
* Patients with malignancy
* Patients unable to cooperate caused by language or psychosocial conditions
65 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
JRI Orthopaedics Ltd
INDUSTRY
Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank-David Øhrn, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust
Mathias Brevik, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust
Otto Schnell Husby, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Kirsti Sevaldsen, MD, PHD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kristiansund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust
Kristiansund, Møre and Romsdal, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Murphy LB, Helmick CG, Schwartz TA, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch GG, Dragomir AD, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. One in four people may develop symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in his or her lifetime. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Nov;18(11):1372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7.
Badarudeen S, Shu AC, Ong KL, Baykal D, Lau E, Malkani AL. Complications After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1954-1958. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 May;86(4):504-9.
Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51.
Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Nov;76(6):912-7.
Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):377-83.
Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
Broden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
Otten V, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Nilsson KG, Olivecrona H. Are CT Scans a Satisfactory Substitute for the Follow-Up of RSA Migration Studies of Uncemented Cups? A Comparison of RSA Double Examinations and CT Datasets of 46 Total Hip Arthroplasties. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3681458. doi: 10.1155/2017/3681458. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Engseth LHW, Schulz A, Pripp AH, Rohrl SMH, Ohrn FD. CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop. 2023 Apr 27;94:207-214. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.12306.
Burkhart TA, Khadem M, Wood TJ, Dunning CE, Degen R, Lanting BA. Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Oct;69:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
Otten VT, Crnalic S, Rohrl SM, Nivbrant B, Nilsson KG. Stability of Uncemented Cups - Long-Term Effect of Screws, Pegs and HA Coating: A 14-Year RSA Follow-Up of Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
Brodt S, Bischoff K, Schulze M, Nowack D, Roth A, Matziolis G. The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05219-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
Alshameeri Z, Bajekal R, Varty K, Khanduja V. Iatrogenic vascular injuries during arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1447-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35241.
Ayob KA, Merican AM, Sulaiman SH, Hariz Ramli AR. The tale of two vessels, vascular complications following a breach of the pelvic inner table due to acetabular screws: a report of two cases. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):239-244. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2021.77862.
Kinmont JC. Penetrating bladder injury caused by a medially placed acetabular screw. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999 Summer;8(2):98-100.
Keeling P, Howell JR, Kassam AM, Sathu A, Timperley AJ, Hubble MJW, Wilson MJ, Whitehouse SL. Long-Term Survival of the Cemented Exeter Universal Stem in Patients 50 Years and Younger: An Update on 130 Hips. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1042-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
Ling RS, Charity J, Lee AJ, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):511-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
Mahon J, McCarthy CJ, Sheridan GA, Cashman JP, O'Byrne JM, Kenny P. Outcomes of the Exeter V40 cemented femoral stem at a minimum of ten years in a non-designer centre. Bone Jt Open. 2020 Dec 7;1(12):743-748. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.112.BJO-2020-0163.R1.
Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;40(9):779-84. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.027276. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
Taraldsen K, Askim T, Sletvold O, Einarsen EK, Bjastad KG, Indredavik B, Helbostad JL. Evaluation of a body-worn sensor system to measure physical activity in older people with impaired function. Phys Ther. 2011 Feb;91(2):277-85. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100159. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
Derbyshire B, Prescott RJ, Porter ML. Notes on the use and interpretation of radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):124-30. doi: 10.1080/17453670902807474.
Engdal M, Foss OA, Taraldsen K, Husby VS, Winther SB. Daily Physical Activity in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Undergoing Different Surgical Approaches: A Cohort Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jul;96(7):473-478. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000657.
Husby OS, Haugan K, Benum P, Foss OA. A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Mar;11(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0087-x. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
Sevaldsen K, S Husby O, B Lian O, S Husby V. Does the line-to-line cementing technique of the femoral stem create an adequate cement mantle? Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):618-623. doi: 10.1177/1120700020934368. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Sevaldsen K, Schnell Husby O, Lian OB, Farran KM, Schnell Husby V. Is the French Paradox cementing philosophy superior to the standard cementing? A randomized controlled radiostereometric trial and comparative analysis. Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):19-26. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0325.R2.
Ohrn FD, Lian OB, Tsukanaka M, Rohrl SM. Early migration of a medially stabilized total knee arthroplasty : a radiostereometric analysis study up to two years. Bone Jt Open. 2021 Sep;2(9):737-744. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0115.R1.
Ohrn FD, Van Leeuwen J, Tsukanaka M, Rohrl SM. A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning guides with conventional technique. Acta Orthop. 2018 Aug;89(4):418-424. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1470866. Epub 2018 May 9.
Scheerlinck T, Polfliet M, Deklerck R, Van Gompel G, Buls N, Vandemeulebroucke J. Development and validation of an automated and marker-free CT-based spatial analysis method (CTSA) for assessment of femoral hip implant migration: In vitro accuracy and precision comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop. 2016;87(2):139-45. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1123569. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
Boettner F, Sculco P, Lipman J, Renner L, Faschingbauer M. A novel method to measure femoral component migration by computed tomography: a cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jun;136(6):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2442-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
ICMJE recommendations
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
536698
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.