Comparison of the Use of Conventional Ancillary Reaming and Single-use Ancillary Reaming Material in Total Hip Replacement
NCT ID: NCT04903860
Last Updated: 2022-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-12
2022-07-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The assessment will focus on the medico-economic differences found in this prospective randomized study
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of a Short Uncemented Femoral Stem to a Similar Standard Uncemented Femoral Stem
NCT03500926
Observational Ambispective Study on HYPE Cups Associated With HIPER Liner
NCT06465940
A Comparison of Two Surface Materials (Tantalum Versus Titanium Fiber Mesh) of Acetabular Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116051
Evaluation of Implant Survival in Patients With a Pinnacle Ultamet Device in Conventional Total Hip Joint Replacement
NCT01684631
Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03692364
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Single-use reamers are instruments that are used on a single patient and then discarded. Performance and safety of use are optimized by providing a sterile and new product for each use.
Therefore, it seems judicious to compare the medico-economic differences between the use of single-use reamers versus reusable reamers within a classic ancillary.
This study will compare the costs incurred, the waste produced, the operating time, the satisfaction of the surgeon after the use of single-use reamers during total hip replacement, versus conventional re-sterilizable ancillary and verify the equivalence, three months after surgery, of clinical and radiological results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single use reamers
Total hip replacement with the use of disposable reamers
total hip replacement with single use ancillary
Comparison of the use of conventional ancillary reaming and single-use ancillary reaming material in total hip replacement
conventional ancillary
Total hip replacement with the use of conventional reamers
total hip replacement with conventional ancillary
Comparison of the use of conventional ancillary reaming and single-use ancillary reaming material in total hip replacement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
total hip replacement with single use ancillary
Comparison of the use of conventional ancillary reaming and single-use ancillary reaming material in total hip replacement
total hip replacement with conventional ancillary
Comparison of the use of conventional ancillary reaming and single-use ancillary reaming material in total hip replacement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient registered to the national health system
* Patient able to understand information about the protocol and answer to questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria
* Major disability
* History of hip replacement surgery
* Any surgical and/or anesthetic contraindication, or any condition deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the research.
* Morbid obesity as defined by body mass index (BMI) \>40 kg.m-2
* History of recent infection at the surgical site
* Surgical contraindication
* Refusal to participate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Lépine
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roger ERIVAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU clermont-ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Erivan R, Bourzat N, Mulliez A, Mougues C, Descamps S, Boisgard S, Villatte G. Single-use versus reusable ancillaries for dual mobility cup in total hip replacement. A prospective randomized short-term safety and feasibility comparison. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Nov;109(7):103658. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103658. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-A00363-38
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RBHP 2021 ERIVAN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.