Transnasal Versus Suprazygomatic SPG Block in Persistant Idiopathic Facial Pain
NCT ID: NCT06496841
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-01
2023-04-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in Patients Undergoing Septorhinoplasty
NCT04020393
The Effect of Bilateral Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block on Postoperative Pain in Patients to be Subject to Septorhinoplasty Surgery
NCT06016816
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Duration of Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Block Application With PENG Block and Pulse Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Hip Pain
NCT06728488
Effectiveness of Ultrasonography-Guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Thoracic Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
NCT07067892
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in Septorhinoplasty
NCT06157970
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our study was designed retrospectively. The primary aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of transnasal and suprazigomatic routes based on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores by reviewing the files of patients who underwent sphenopalatine ganglion block for persistent idiopathic facial pain. The pain scores recorded before the procedure and one and four weeks after the procedure will be compared.
In this study, primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of these two treatment modalities, with retrospectively evaluate the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test-6) score and headache diary data of the patients who have previously undergone these treatments in the pain clinic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block group
transnasal administration of lidocaine to the sphenopalatine ganglion
Transnasal Sphenopalatine ganglion block
The transnasal approach to the sphenopalatine ganglion block allows for non-invasive access to the sphenopalatine ganglion, which is located deep in the nasopharynx in a recess posterior to the middle turbinate. A long cotton swab is inserted posterior to the nasopharynx until it is properly seated, and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine is injected through the outer end of the swab and left for 30 minutes. Patients are monitored for any potential complications or adverse effects throughout the procedure and for a period of time afterwards.
Ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic sphenopalatine ganglion block group
ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic approach
Ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic sphenopalatine ganglion block
The ultrasound transducer is placed in the infrazygomatic area, above the maxilla, at approximately a 45 cephalad angle. With this transducer position, the ptrigopalatine fossa, bounded anteriorly by the maxilla and posteriorly by the pterygoid process, is visualized. A 25 gauge spinal needle is inserted 1 to 1.5 cm above the zygomatic arch and posterior to the posterior orbital rim and advanced through an out-of-plane approach to reach the pterigolapalatine fossa. After the aspiration test, 3 mL of 2% lidocaine is injected and the spread of the drug is monitored by ultrasound. Patients are monitored for possible side effects and complications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transnasal Sphenopalatine ganglion block
The transnasal approach to the sphenopalatine ganglion block allows for non-invasive access to the sphenopalatine ganglion, which is located deep in the nasopharynx in a recess posterior to the middle turbinate. A long cotton swab is inserted posterior to the nasopharynx until it is properly seated, and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine is injected through the outer end of the swab and left for 30 minutes. Patients are monitored for any potential complications or adverse effects throughout the procedure and for a period of time afterwards.
Ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic sphenopalatine ganglion block
The ultrasound transducer is placed in the infrazygomatic area, above the maxilla, at approximately a 45 cephalad angle. With this transducer position, the ptrigopalatine fossa, bounded anteriorly by the maxilla and posteriorly by the pterygoid process, is visualized. A 25 gauge spinal needle is inserted 1 to 1.5 cm above the zygomatic arch and posterior to the posterior orbital rim and advanced through an out-of-plane approach to reach the pterigolapalatine fossa. After the aspiration test, 3 mL of 2% lidocaine is injected and the spread of the drug is monitored by ultrasound. Patients are monitored for possible side effects and complications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moderate to severe pain (pain of 6 or more on a numeric pain scale of 0-10)
* Persistence of pain for more than 6 months
* Pain unresponsive to conservative methods
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment
* Hepatic or renal insufficiency
* Local or systemic infection
* Coagulopathy
* Patient refusal to accept treatment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Damla Yürük
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ömer Taylan Akkaya, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Ezgi Can, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPG block
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.