Comparison of Hypoxia Between HFNC and SNC in Patient Undergoing UGI Endoscopic Procedures in Deep Sedation
NCT ID: NCT06482879
Last Updated: 2024-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
122 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-07-01
2024-02-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This was prospective, comparative observational study conducted in a tertiary care center of Nepal with the primary objective to compare the rates of hypoxia (SpO2 \< 92%) and secondary objectives were to compare interruption of procedure due to hypoxia, minimum hypoxia level and episodes of hypoxia between high flow nasal canula (flow rate of 30l/min with FiO2 of 0.5) and simple nasal canula (flow rate of 6l/min) in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in semi-prone position in deep sedation using propofol infusion.
The study comprised 125 participants, 58 in simple nasal canula and 67 in high flow nasal cannula group. The incidence of hypoxia in simple nasal cannula and high flow nasal cannula groups, with rates of 37.3% (22/58) and 16.4% (11/67), respectively. The relative risk (RR) of hypoxia was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81), with a p-value of 0.009. Procedural interruptions due to hypoxia occurred in 8.6% (5/58) of participants in the simple nasal cannula group and 4.47% (3/67) in the high flow nasal cannula group, with RR of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.02-1.41) and a p-value 0.1. Furthermore, the occurrence of multiple episodes of hypoxia was higher in the simple nasal cannula group compared to the high flow nasal cannula group (5 vs. 0), with a p-value \< 0.001.The use of high flow nasal cannula reduces the occurrence of hypoxia in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with deep sedation compared to simple nasal cannula.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High-flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygenation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Sedation in Obese Patients
NCT06231836
High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy for Advanced Endoscopy in High-risk Patients.
NCT06610461
HIFLO ENDO-High Flow Nasal Cannula in GI Endoscopy
NCT03028688
A Comparison of High-flow Nasal Oxygen and Conventional Nasal Cannula in Monitored Anesthesia Care for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT06688019
Comparison of Digital Intubation (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy
NCT04414839
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After arriving in the procedure room, standard monitoring, including pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and electrocardiography were attached. An anesthesiologist assigned made the decision on which oxygenation device to use for the patient. In SNC group, an oxygen flow rate of 6 l/min where in HFNC group at the beginning of procedure flow was set 10 l/min once patient was induced flow rate increased to 30 l/min with FiO2 of 0.5. The patients were positioned either laterally or semiprone. Prior to the start of the procedure, the patient was given an injection of fentanyl 1mcg/kg. An initial dose of propofol was administered at a rate of 1-1.5 mg/kg by slow titrating manner. The sedation level, ventilatory pattern,rate and depth were clinically monitored throughout the procedure.The propofol infusion was kept between 25-150 mcg/kg/min, aiming for preventing facial grimace, agitation, or gag reflex, while still allowing the patient to respond to painful stimuli. In case of any sings of agitation noticed, the anaesthesiologist added the additional dose of propofol or increase the propofol infusion rate or both, as in our usual practice.
In SNC group, if SpO2 decreased below 92%, flow rate increased to 8 l/min whereas in HFNC group FiO2 increased to 1 and flow rate increased to 50 l/min. If desaturation continued despite of above mentioned measure in both groups, anesthesiologist increased the FiO2, flow or both. Bag mask ventilation and tracheal intubation was done if needed. Other events; bradycardia needing atropine, hypotension needing vasopressor, persistent hypoxia needing bag and mask, endotracheal intubation was recorded.
Hypoxia is defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation \< 92%. Severe hypoxia is defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation \< 80%. Primary outcome was the compare the rate of hypoxia and secondary outcome was to compare the rate of interruption of procedure due to hypoxia and episodes of hypoxia during the procedure between the two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High flow nasal canula
Patient undergoing upper GI endoscopic procedure under deep sedation will receive high flow nasal canula.
Oxygen delivery
Oxygen is delivered with high flow nasal canula or simple nasal canula to prevent hypoxia during procedures under deep sedation.
Simple nasal canula
Patient undergoing upper GI endoscopic procedure under deep sedation will receive simple nasal canula.
Oxygen delivery
Oxygen is delivered with high flow nasal canula or simple nasal canula to prevent hypoxia during procedures under deep sedation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oxygen delivery
Oxygen is delivered with high flow nasal canula or simple nasal canula to prevent hypoxia during procedures under deep sedation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anuj Jung Karki
Associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anuj Jung Karki
Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NamsAnuj
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.