Optimize Audit and feedbaCk To Implement eVidence-based prAcTices in Primary Health carE

NCT06480487 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 344

Last updated 2025-04-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators will use two phases of Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) - preparation and optimization phases. In the preparation phase, Audit and Feedback (AnF) intervention will be prepared. First, the investigators will use scoping review to develop conceptual frameworks for AnF components. The outcome indicators and resource constraints for intervention will be identified based on the literature reviews. Second, an expert consultation meeting will be conducted to develop a set of candidate components for the AnF intervention. Around 10 relevant scholars and primary healthcare workers will be invited to rank the components that researchers conclude from the literature. The top 7 ranked components will be assessed by Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) questionnaires to finally identify 3 key components for AnF intervention.

In the optimization phase, the investigators will identify AnF intervention that will lead to the best desired results within key resource constraints in terms of effectiveness , efficiency, economy and scalability. First, the investigators will realistically and comprehensively assess the quality of care provided by primary healthcare facilities of the four Low and Middle Income countries (LMICs) using USP. Second, a 2×2×2 factorial design (RCT) will be conducted to determine how the results of quality of care can be fed back to primary healthcare workers in the four LMICs in order to optimize the impact of improving healthcare quality. To achieve this goal, the factorial trial will involve the 3 identified key AnF components at 2 levels each, for a total of 8 intervention groups (i.e. 8 different ways to conduct audit and feedback). By randomly assigning healthcare facilities to one of these 8 different ways to conduct audit and feedback, the investigators can obtain the change in the quality of care after implementing audit and feedback interventions in these facilities. Then, through statistical analysis, the investigators can estimate main and interaction effects for AnF components on improving the quality of primary health care. After that, the optimal combination of AnF components will be determined by trade off of the effects of AnF components and resource constraints in local primary healthcare implementation settings. Study details are as follows.

Conditions

  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided face to face

Feedback will be provided face-to-face.

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided by electronic mail

Feedback will be provided by electronic mail.

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided by researchers

Feedback will be provided by researchers.

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided by authoritative bodies

Feedback will be provided by authoritative bodies.

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided with peer comparision

Feedback will be provided with peer comparison.

BEHAVIORAL

Feedback provided without peer comparision

Feedback will be provided without peer comparision.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Southern Medical University, China

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dong Xu · Southern Medical Univerity

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-05-31
Primary Completion
2025-09-30
Completion
2025-10-31

Related Clinical Trials

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06480487 on ClinicalTrials.gov