A Comparison of Computerised Versus Interviewer-administered Approach for Assessing Health-related Quality of Life

NCT00537264 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4800

Last updated 2018-04-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare a multimedia, computerised approach vs. interviewer administration of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments.

Conditions

  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease
  • Hypertension
  • Stroke

Interventions

OTHER

Health-related quality of life assessment

Study participants will be asked to complete the following health-related quality of life questionnaires: EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index 3, SF-8 and SF-6D. The Singapore (Chinese) versions of these questionnaires have been previously tested and validated in a pilot cohort of the same study population.

OTHER

Health-related quality of life assessment

Study participants will be asked to complete the following health-related quality of life questionnaires: EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index 3, SF-8 and SF-6D. The Singapore (Chinese) versions of these questionnaires have been previously tested and validated in a pilot cohort of the same study population.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National University of Singapore

    collaborator OTHER
  • Singapore General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Julian Thumboo, FRCP (Edin) · Singapore General Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-11-30
Primary Completion
2008-07-31
Completion
2008-07-31

Countries

  • Singapore

Study Locations

Related Clinical Trials

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00537264 on ClinicalTrials.gov