Clinical Effects of the Medial Longitudinal Arch Slope of a Plantar Orthosis
NCT ID: NCT06474585
Last Updated: 2024-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-20
2024-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Is the slope of the medial longitudinal arch of the orthotic treatment a factor that reduces the peak tibial accelerometry in a symptomatic foot with a medially oriented subtalar joint axis? To assess the predictive effect of changes in acceleration impacts on the patient's painful symptoms.
The researchers will compare the MLA of the insole taken in a standing position with the MLA of the insole taken in a sitting position (the treatment applied in routine clinical practice) to evaluate if changing the slope of the MLA generates changes in the tibial acceleration impacts.
The participants:
Must use the insoles to carry out their daily activities, except for sleeping or bathing.
The first review of the orthotic treatment will be conducted 3 months after the treatment initiation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Postural Insoles on Stability and Leg Muscular Activity
NCT04836650
Effect of Manual Therapy and Inmediately Application of Plantar Orthoses
NCT05847972
How Prefabricated Plantar Insoles Can Reduce the Pronation
NCT03954821
Effect Mechanism of Custom-made Foot Orthoses in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT03996980
Orthopaedic Treatment in Propulsive Metatarsalgia
NCT05713175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sample Size A sample size is estimated for the comparison of two independent proportions at a 5% significance level, an 80% statistical power, and a two-tailed test. Since no published study has evaluated exactly the angulation in both sitting and standing positions under the same conditions, reference values are not precisely known. However, it is estimated that the main outcome variable, peak acceleration, will behave similarly. There is a threshold for this variable at 8 g, such that a peak above this is a risk factor for developing lower limb pathology. In our study, it is expected that only 5% of patients in group A will have a peak above 8 g, while 30% of patients in group B will have a peak above 8 g. Considering these factors and anticipating a 15% possible dropout rate, a minimum sample size of 37 patients per group is needed to achieve the main objective, totaling 74 patients.
Analyzed Variables and Data Collection Procedures Patient data recording will begin on the first consultation day after conducting the relevant screening and fulfilling the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data will be collected in a data collection notebook, with each patient assigned an identification code to safeguard compliance with the Organic Law on Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights 3/2018, of December 5, and Law 41/2002, of November 14, which regulates the patient's autonomy and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation.
Dependent Variables
Outcome Variables:
Primary Variable: Maximum tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Secondary Variables:
Maximum head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Head acceleration ratio (38-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Tibial acceleration ratio (30-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Impact attenuation (%). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Step length (cm). Continuous quantitative variable (cm). Stride frequency (Hz). Continuous quantitative variable (Hz). Independent Variables Treatment Variables Demographic Variables - Covariates Clinical Variables Variables related to the wear of the orthotic treatment Study Planning Patient Recruitment Start: June 2024 Estimated End of Patient Recruitment: December 2024 Treatments Treatment A: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO at the necessary degrees according to the patient's biomechanical characteristics, MLA that replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the sitting position (unloaded). Duration of treatment: 12 weeks.
Treatment B: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO, and the MLA taken from the patient replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the standing position (loaded). Duration: 12 weeks.
Patient Visit Planning VISIT 1: Inclusion in the study. VISIT 2: Treatment delivery. Acceleration data will be recorded using an Xsens DOR accelerometry system (Xsens, Enschede, Netherlands: total mass: 10.9 g; dimensions 36x30x11 mm, range ± 16 g), consisting of 3 triaxial accelerometers. Two accelerometers will be placed on the anteromedial surface of the distal end of both tibias, 3 cm superior to the medial malleolus where the first uniform/flat surface is present, with the vertical axis of the accelerometer parallel to the tibial vertical axis; the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the tibial vertical axis; and the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the accelerometer's vertical axis perpendicular to the ground. All accelerometers will be placed by a single researcher (ASR). Patients will wear sports clothing, shorts, and neutral Reebok Classics sneakers. Before starting the test, the patient will walk freely around the room for 5 minutes to get used to the shoes and/or orthosis. Then, the patient will be instructed to walk at a "comfortable and safe" speed along a straight 12 m corridor, performing a total of 10 series. Accelerometry data will be recorded during the central 8 meters, with 2 meters at the start and 2 meters at the end designated as acceleration and deceleration zones, respectively, to avoid their effects. The speed of each series will be recorded using a photo-cell system (Chronojump Boscosystem), but it will not be controlled to avoid altering the natural gait pattern. The average speed of all series for each participant will be calculated, and those not within ±5% of each participant's average speed will be discarded to minimize the effect of gait speed on acceleration impacts.
After this second visit, orthoses A and B will be distributed randomly, dividing the sample into two equal halves, so that patients will use the assigned orthosis daily for 12 weeks.
VISIT 3: 12 weeks after starting the treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sitting Group
Patients assigned the treatment molded in the unloaded condition (this is the routine clinical practice).
Plantar orthosis
Plantar orthosis taken in sitting position Plantar orthosis taken in standing position
Weight-bearing Group
Patients assigned the treatment molded under load.
Plantar orthosis
Plantar orthosis taken in sitting position Plantar orthosis taken in standing position
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plantar orthosis
Plantar orthosis taken in sitting position Plantar orthosis taken in standing position
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Navicular Drop Test \> 10 mm. Subjects with painful symptoms associated with foot pronation position. Signed informed consent explaining the study's characteristics and objectives.
Exclusion Criteria
Previous diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological systemic disease. History of foot or ankle surgery resulting in limitations in the mobility of the subtalar, midtarsal, or metatarsophalangeal joints.
History of leg, ankle, or foot fracture resulting in limitations in the mobility of these structures.
Lower limb morpho-functional alteration: clinical asymmetry greater than 5 mm, presence of genu varum, genu valgum with a difference of more than 2° femoro-tibial between limbs, internal or external femoral torsion.
Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study's objectives and compliance with participation guidelines.
Patients unable to walk independently due to musculoskeletal injury in the lower limbs within the last 6 months.
Currently receiving any analgesic treatment for the lower limbs at the time of intervention.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24/229--E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.