Effect of Medial Wedge on Static Balance in Pronated Feet

NCT ID: NCT05437042

Last Updated: 2022-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of heel wedges is often recommended as a clinical routine in individuals with foot pronation. However, there is a lack of information for examining the immediate effect of supports used to restore foot biomechanics on balance. The aim of our study is to examine the immediate effect of calcaneal support in the frontal plane on static balance in individuals with increased pronated foot. In this study, the fore-hind foot load distribution in static bipedal stance will be examined in healthy young adults. Then, static balance measurements will be made on one leg with and without support (medial heel wedge). For the evaluation of static balance on one leg, x-y mean, ellipse surface, A-P index measurements and romberg test will be used. In addition, the pain of individuals will be questioned and their foot postures will be evaluated. Healthy young adult individuals with a subtalar angle of 5 degrees and above in the weighted position will be included in the evaluations. Evaluations of the participants are planned to take approximately 15 minutes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a normal foot, the subtalar joint is pronated from heel strike to sole contact, which makes the midtarsal joint and forefoot flexible. Between sole contact and toe lift, the subtalar joint becomes supinated and the foot turns into a rigid lever (1,2). Hindfoot overpronation can be defined as pronation of the subtalar joint during gait phases in which supination is normal. It can cause problems such as abnormal pronation in the foot, increased flexibility, deterioration in load distribution, hallux valgus and heel spurs, and postural disorders involving the leg, knee, hip and spine (3). In addition, the increase in rear foot pronation negatively affects the physical performance of individuals such as jumping and running (4). Commonly used conservative methods to prevent pronation in the subtalar joint include exercises to support the medial arch, strengthen muscles and ligaments, electrical stimulation, insoles, wedges, and applications such as flexible and inflexible taping techniques (1,5).

Medial wedge is a method frequently preferred by physiotherapists in terms of ease of use among the methods used in the routine. It is thought that the contact of the medial longitudinal arch support of the insole with the foot prevents the increase in pronation of the foot and reduces the load on the arch structures. The medial longitudinal arch support transfers the load on the heel region to the midfoot and the decrease in maximum pressure in the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal regions is explained by the insoles turning the foot towards supination. It is stated that excessive pronation of the hindfoot and the secondary deformities it may cause can be prevented by the use of simple supports applied under the foot.

The foot is located at the most distal point and acts as the support base for this kinematic chain. For this reason, the smallest dynamic change in the foot affects the balance of the whole body (6). Balance is the ability to keep the body's center of gravity within the acceptable limits of the support surface during activities such as sitting, standing or walking, and it is a complex process that includes versatile sensory, motor and biomechanical components (7).

It is known that foot deformities in seniors negatively affect balance and cause falls (8). Along with the changes in the gravity line in neurological diseases, problems are seen in maintaining the balance starting from the sitting level and in situations that require a change in movement. Conditions such as loss of balance or inability to maintain body position in athletes may prevent the athlete from performing the expected performance, as well as cause injuries (9). Balance improvement has an important place in every field of physiotherapy. Improving balance, increasing function in the athlete, improving performance; To ensure the continuity of mobility in neuromuscular diseases and neurological problems, to increase the quality of life; in healthy individuals, it is important to prevent injuries. In this study, the immediate effect of the medial heel wedge on static balance and weight distribution in individuals with pronated foot was investigated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot; Deformity, Valgus, Congenital Foot; Deformity, Valgus (Acquired) Foot Deformities Flatfoot

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individuals with pronated foot

Medial calcaneal wedge

Intervention Type OTHER

Immediate effect of medial calcaneal wedge for static balance and weight distribution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medial calcaneal wedge

Immediate effect of medial calcaneal wedge for static balance and weight distribution

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Standing subtalar angle of 5° or more
* Foot Posture Index score of 6 or more
* Right lower limb dominance
* Agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a neurological or orthopedic problem
* Having any surgery on the lower extremity
* Having a foot-ankle complex Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score above 6.4
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pamukkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Izgi Guven

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Ankara, Sıhhiye, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leung AK, Mak AF, Evans JH. Biomedical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998 Apr;22(1):25-34. doi: 10.3109/03093649809164454.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9604273 (View on PubMed)

McPoil TG, Hunt GC. Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;21(6):381-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.381.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7655482 (View on PubMed)

Valmassy RL. clinical biomechanics of the lower extermities. Mosby, Missouri. 1996;12:143-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kararti C, Bilgin S, Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B. Arka Ayaktaki Pronasyon Artisinin Fiziksel Performans Uzerine Etkisi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal. 2018;5(1):1-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hadley A, Griffiths S, Griffiths L, Vicenzino B. Antipronation taping and temporary orthoses. Effects on tibial rotation position after exercise. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Mar;89(3):118-23. doi: 10.7547/87507315-89-3-118.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10095333 (View on PubMed)

Al Abdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ. The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(3):172-6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1029608. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26400632 (View on PubMed)

Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & posture. 1995 Dec 1;3(4):193-214.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Whitney KA. Foot deformities, biomechanical and pathomechanical changes associated with aging including orthotic considerations, Part II. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003 Jul;20(3):511-26, x. doi: 10.1016/S0891-8422(03)00046-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12952051 (View on PubMed)

Borklu T, Dolu N. Sporcularda Isitsel Uyarilma Potansiyellerindeki Hemisferik Farkliliklar. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi (Journal of Health Sciences). 2010;19(2):108-18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HU/PAU/GUVEN-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.