Theories of Working Memory and Consolidation/RECOnsolidation in the Process of Resorption of Post-traumatic Symptoms.
NCT ID: NCT06469333
Last Updated: 2025-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-06
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Desensitization Therapy and Re-treatment of Eye Movement Information [EMDR] in Patients With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD]
NCT04431765
EMDR Versus Imagery Rescripting for Trauma-Related Intrusions
NCT06215313
EMDR Therapy in Young Children, a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05419934
Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in the ED and Post-Traumatic Syndrome
NCT03194386
fMRI in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) During Working Memory Updating
NCT00288314
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that it is now possible to modulate the persistence of intrusions in memory, as well as their emotional impact, through Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. EMDR is based on the administration of visual, auditory (sound) or sensory (tapping) Alternating Bilateral Stimulations (ABS). These ABS, which can be self-administered by the patient during the Memory Activation (MA) of an intrusive thought, would reduce the emotionality and vividness of the intrusive symptoms and decrease the associated physiological reactivity.
Recent research claims that the mechanisms of action of ABS involve a joint articulation of both neurobiological (Memory Consolidation/Reconsolidation (M-C/R) and psychological (Working Memory (WM)) theories.
Memory consolidation refers to the transfer of a newly acquired memory trace into WM (fragile and susceptible to forgetting) and its stabilization in Long-Term Memory (LTM). Consolidation involves two processes. The first, synaptic consolidation, requires the triggering of molecular processes operating within a time window of between 10 minutes and 6 hours. The second, called systemic consolidation, can extend over years and takes place mainly during the sleep cycle. Reconsolidation implies that an intrusion, when activated in WM, becomes labile again and must subsequently be consolidated again (reconsolidated) in LTM. A permanent memory can thus be revived, then degraded, notably by the administration of ABS likely to interfere with its reconsolidation in memory.
Working memory (WM) refers to a memory system that enables the temporary retention and processing of information needed to perform complex cognitive tasks. capacity is limited. In fact, the competition of two simultaneous tasks (e.g. BAS administration during the memory activation (MA) of an intrusive thought) implies, in a consequential way, an alteration in its storage performance, as well as a decrease in the emotional load associated with the intrusion. In other words, while WM remains the strongest lead to date, it can only be considered in conjunction with M-C/R theory.
From a clinical/experimental protocol point of view, this link implies compliance with a number of criteria. The first is the temporal criterion for ABS administration (between 10 minutes and 6 hours post-MA), as well as the quantitative criterion relating to the number of MAs (not to exceed 4 MAs). In other words, the application of an interventional methodology that does not meet all these criteria (i.e., administration of ABS performed outside the M-C/R time window and repeated MA of the same intrusion) would induce the involvement of a third process, namely the extinction process. In one study, the application of an extinction protocol performed within the consolidation window (a paradigm known as Retrieval Extinction (P-R/E)) also induced a modification of the initial memory trace. It would therefore seem appropriate to consider the adoption of a tri-processual integrative model involving the joint articulation of Working Memory (WM), Memory Consolidation/Reconsolidation (C/R-M) and the Retrieval Extinction Paradigm (P-R/E). This is why we propose to study, in this research , the role of the application of this tri-processual theoretical modeling on the emotionality and vividness associated with intrusions, as well as on their psychophysiological and psychopathological consequences. Through the use of new technologies, these methodologies could complement conventional psychotherapeutic treatments which, through the self-administration of ABS, could add up and, in fact, potentiate the effectiveness of psychotherapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
The participant is asked to concentrate on the image or, failing that, the sensory representation representing the worst aspect of the targeted intrusive thought for 10 seconds, and to stare at the black computer screen.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eye movements (EM)
The participant is asked to focus on the image or, failing that, the sensory representation representing the worst aspect of the targeted intrusive thought for 10 seconds and visually follow the horizontal displacement of a white dot (Ø 1cm) on the black screen at a constant speed of 1.2 Hz. This speed, implying the displacement of 1.2 left-right-left cycles per second, targets the saturation of working memory.
Eye movements (EM)
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and visually follows the horizontal movement of a white dot (Ø 1 cm) on the black computer screen 8 times for 24 seconds.
Eye movements and auditory stimulations (EM+AS)
The participant will have to concentrate on the image or, failing that, the sensory representation representing the worst aspect of the targeted intrusive thought for 10 seconds and follow the horizontal displacement of a white dot on the computer screen, while simultaneously perceiving the auditory "beep" tones in the headphones provided. These tones will be at a rate of 1.2 Hz (i.e. 1.2 left ear-right ear-left ear alternations per second).
Eye movements (EM)
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and visually follows the horizontal movement of a white dot (Ø 1 cm) on the black computer screen 8 times for 24 seconds.
Auditory stimulations
The participant focuses on the intrusive thoughts and hears the auditory "beeps" through the headphones provided 8 times for 24 seconds.
Eye movements, auditory stimulations and tactile stimulations (EM+AS+TS)
The participant is asked to concentrate on the image or, failing that, the sensory representation representing the worst aspect of the targeted intrusive thought for 10 seconds, and to follow the horizontal displacement of a white dot on the computer screen and simultaneously perceive the "beeps", as well as the tactile self-stimulations applied at a constant speed of 1.2Hz (i.e. 1.2 left-right-left tapping cycles per second).
Eye movements (EM)
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and visually follows the horizontal movement of a white dot (Ø 1 cm) on the black computer screen 8 times for 24 seconds.
Auditory stimulations
The participant focuses on the intrusive thoughts and hears the auditory "beeps" through the headphones provided 8 times for 24 seconds.
Tactile stimulations
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and applies tactile self-stimulation 8 times for 24 seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Eye movements (EM)
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and visually follows the horizontal movement of a white dot (Ø 1 cm) on the black computer screen 8 times for 24 seconds.
Auditory stimulations
The participant focuses on the intrusive thoughts and hears the auditory "beeps" through the headphones provided 8 times for 24 seconds.
Tactile stimulations
The participant focuses on the intrusive thought and applies tactile self-stimulation 8 times for 24 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being in need of psychotherapeutic follow-up but not having started it yet;
* Be aged between 18 and 65 years inclusive;
* Speak and write French (be able to understand information and complete questionnaires independently);
* Have good vision (being able to follow the movement of a white point on a screen);
* Have good hearing and tactile abilities (being able to perceive auditory and tactile tones);
* Have a computer equipped with a webcam;
* Be informed and sign informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Be a person subject to a judicial safeguard measure;
* Present a lack of autonomy implying an impossibility in terms of administering questionnaires and filling out questionnaires;
* Have a vision defect implying an impossibility of visual tracking of a white dot;
* Present a hearing defect and/or tactile abilities implying an impossibility of perception;
* Have a neurological condition constituting measurement biases (muscular dysfunctions, perceptual dysfunctions, etc.);
* Suffer from psychotraumatic and dissociative disorders of complex type (respectively evaluated with regard to the anamestistic data of the patients and with a score greater than 25 on the dissociative experiences scale (Dissociative Experiences Scale, DES);
* Do not present psychological distress (score less than 8 on the Kessler Abbreviated Psychological Distress Scale, K6) ;
* Have a drug or alcohol dependence;
* Benefit from ongoing psychotherapeutic monitoring;
* Have already benefited from psychotherapeutic follow-up or have participated in studies in the last 6 months, both involving EMDR therapy.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Lorraine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christine Rotonda
Methodologist/Epidemiologist Head of Research Unit, Pierre Jane Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Umr U1319 Inspiire
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A00296-41
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.