Randomized Phase II Trial: Chest Wall RT Omission After Prosthetic Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT06464913
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
152 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2029-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Can omitting chest wall RT after prosthetic reconstruction reduce the failure rate of breast reconstruction without significantly increasing the local recurrence rate?
* Does this approach ensure an improvement in the quality of life for patients without sacrificing therapeutic effectiveness?
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of two groups.
* One group will receive standard RT to the chest wall and supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage areas.
* The other group will have chest wall RT omitted and will only receive RT to the supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage areas.
* Participate in follow-up assessments to monitor reconstruction failure rates and local recurrence rates.
If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the outcomes of the two groups to evaluate the impact of chest wall RT omission on reconstruction failure and local recurrence risks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiotherapy After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Local Recurrence
NCT03101683
Hypofractionated vs Conventional RT After Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
NCT07084519
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Preoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
NCT07164872
Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction
NCT02055937
Hypofractionated Radiation Fractionation in Breast Cancer Patients with Implant-Based Reconstruction
NCT06830083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Reconstruction methods include autologous tissue and prosthetic implants, with the latter becoming more popular due to shorter surgery times and faster recovery. The choice between immediate, delayed, and two-stage reconstruction depends on tumor characteristics and patient factors. PMRT indications are based on tumor features and risks. The 2019 ESTRO expert consensus pointed out that the radiotherapy target area after breast prosthetic implantation should include the chest wall and all high-risk lymphatic drainage areas of the axillary region that have not been removed. While PMRT improves outcomes, it increases complications in implant-based reconstructions. Within two years after prosthetic reconstruction surgery, the proportion of patients who have at least one complication after radiotherapy is 39%, while it is 22% for patients who have not received radiotherapy. Early complications include fat or flap necrosis, thrombosis, infection, hematoma, delayed wound healing, and late complications include pain, prosthetic contracture, prosthetic exposure or rupture, and a decline in various indicators of aesthetic results. Patients who ultimately have to remove the implant or convert to autologous tissue reconstruction due to severe complications are defined as reconstruction failure. Among patients who received implant reconstruction and radiotherapy, the proportion of reconstruction failure after two years is the highest (18.7%); in contrast, the failure rate in the non-radiotherapy group or autologous reconstruction group is less than 5%.
Considering the high incidence of complications after prosthetic implantation, the failure rate of breast reconstruction may exceed 20%, while the local recurrence rate after breast reconstruction surgery is around 5%. For early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing cold knife one-step prosthetic reconstruction or two-step expander-prosthetic reconstruction, whether omitting chest wall radiotherapy can reduce the failure of reconstruction without significantly increasing the local recurrence rate, to ensure that improving the quality of life for patients does not sacrifice therapeutic effects. In response to this issue, this project proposes a "randomized Phase II clinical trial of omitting chest wall radiotherapy after prosthetic reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer" prospective study. This study will adopt a randomized controlled method, dividing patients into two groups, one group receiving routine chest wall plus supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy, and the other group omitting chest wall radiotherapy and only receiving supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy, aiming to evaluate the impact of omitting chest wall radiotherapy in PMRT after prosthetic reconstruction on the reconstruction failure rate of breast cancer patients, without significantly increasing the risk of local recurrence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Chest Wall RT
This group will have chest wall RT omitted and will only receive RT to the supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage areas.
With or without chest wall RT
Supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy with or without chest wall RT
Traditional RT
This group will receive standard RT to the chest wall and supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage areas.
With or without chest wall RT
Supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy with or without chest wall RT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
With or without chest wall RT
Supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy with or without chest wall RT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer patients with stage T1-2N1M0;
* ECOG score of 0-1;
* Indications for neoadjuvant therapy before surgery and adjuvant therapy after surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe dysfunction of heart, lung, liver, kidney, or other vital organs;
* Uncontrolled diabetes or other endocrine diseases;
* Known allergy to radiotherapy or chemotherapy drugs;
* Pregnant or lactating women.
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Y2024-0423
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.