Accelerated Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation to Modify Cognitive Function and Balance in Dementia and Memory Loss
NCT ID: NCT06445894
Last Updated: 2024-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study investigates whether rTMS delivered to M1 will lead to greater improvement in balance compared to rTMS delivered to DLPFC. Determining this answer will allow greater success in TMS target refinement. Given the profound burden that geriatric medicine has on the Canadian healthcare system, understanding the link between balance and cognition can significantly impact the approach to management of this population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in MCI and Early AD
NCT04555941
Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognition and Neural Changes in Parkinson's Disease
NCT03243214
Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Fronto-parietal Networks: Modulation by Mental State
NCT04010461
Effect of Accelerated Neuromodulation of Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Enhance Cognition in Older Adults With Mild Memory Problems
NCT07212504
Enhancement of Hippocampal Plasticity Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT03962959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Synaptic plasticity induced via neuromodulatory techniques can lead to improvements in motor and cognitive function. One such technique is Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive form of neuromodulation. To induce synaptic plasticity, magnetic stimuli are delivered via TMS in theta-burst patterns. This includes continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) that induces long term depression (LTD)-like changes in neuronal excitability and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) that induces long term potentiation (LTP)-like changes in neuronal excitability \[12\]. Previous literature suggests that iTBS may be an effective tool for modulating cognition and motor function.
Wu et al. (2022) found an improvement in memory function of Alzheimer disease patients following a 14-day course of iTBS delivered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) \[13\]. Trung et al. (2019) showed that 3 days of iTBS delivered to the DLPFC led to cognitive improvements in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) \[14\]. Regarding balance, iTBS has been shown to be an effective intervention for balance recovery when delivered to the cerebellum \[16,17\] or the primary motor cortex (M1) \[16\]. Improvements in gait performance have also been seen following other patterns of stimulation including repetitive TMS (rTMS) in the post-stroke population \[18-20\]. These improvements in cognition and balance following iTBS may be linked to plastic changes in neuronal structure, as seen in animal models \[21\].
Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) encompass multiple sessions of iTBS administered within a singular day over the course of several days, consequently diminishing the duration of the treatment regimen. aiTBS has been shown to be a tolerable and safe form of non-invasive brain stimulation with rapid antidepressant efficacy and anti-suicidal effects in patients with major depressive disorder \[22-27\]. Previous studies have demonstrated aiTBS paradigm which consisted of iTBS delivered 3 times per day separated by 15 min intervals, over the course of 14 days, resulted in an improvement in memory function in individuals with Alzheimer disease \[13, 27\].
For this study question we have chosen two different stimulation sites. DLFPC is known for its contributions to learning and memory. Individuals with dementia typically receive rTMS stimulation to DLPFC to explore whether cognitive function can be improved (Wu et al., 2020). It has been seen that individuals with dementia suffer from a greater number of falls, it is unclear whether rTMS to DLPFC will improve balance performance and risk of falls better than rTMS delivered to M1, a typical site of stimulation for balance related studies. iTBS has been shown to be an effective intervention for balance recovery when delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) (Liao et al., 2024). Improvements in gait performance have also been seen following other patterns of stimulation including repetitive TMS (rTMS) in the post-stroke population when delivered to M1 (Wang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2019; Rastgoo et al., 2016). These improvements in cognition and balance following iTBS may be linked to plastic changes in neuronal structure, as seen in animal models (Tsang et al., 2021).
We there ask the study question whether rTMS delivered to M1 will lead to greater improvement in balance compared to rTMS delivered to DLPFC. Determining this answer will allow greater success in TMS target refinement. Given the profound burden that geriatric medicine has on the Canadian healthcare system, understanding the link between balance and cognition can significantly impact the approach to management of this population
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo rTMS to M1
sham iTBS will be delivered using a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, UK) guided with neuronavigation (Brainsight, Rogue Research, Montreal, QC, Canada) to target M1. Participants will receive 14 days of placebo stimulation. Following sham iTBS individuals will participate in 10 minutes of balance training performed on balance board (BTracks https://balancetrackingsystems.com).
Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
A sham coil will be utilized for the sham rTMS condition. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active. The location and all other parameters of Sham rTMS will be identical to Active rTMS.
Active rTMS to M1
iTBS will be delivered using a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, UK) guided with neuronavigation (Brainsight, Rogue Research, Montreal, QC, Canada) to target M1. Participants will receive 14 days of stimulation. During each treatment day, three iTBS sessions separated by 15-minute intervals will be delivered. Each iTBS session consists of 600 stimuli delivered in 50 Hz bursts of 3 pulses at 70% of the resting motor threshold. In total, individuals will receive 1800 stimuli delivered each day as performed elsewhere . Following iTBS individuals will participate in 10 minutes of balance training performed on balance board (BTracks https://balancetrackingsystems.com).
Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interossesous (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software.
Active rTMS to DLPFC
iTBS will be delivered using a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, UK) guided with neuronavigation (Brainsight, Rogue Research, Montreal, QC, Canada) to target DLPFC. Participants will receive 14 days of stimulation. During each treatment day, three iTBS sessions separated by 15-minute intervals will be delivered \[13,22\]. Each iTBS session consists of 600 stimuli delivered in 50 Hz bursts of 3 pulses at 70% of the resting motor threshold. In total, individuals will receive 1800 stimuli delivered each day as performed elsewhere \[13,23,27\]. Following iTBS individuals will participate in 10 minutes of balance training performed on balance board (BTracks https://balancetrackingsystems.com).
Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interossesous (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interossesous (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software.
Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
A sham coil will be utilized for the sham rTMS condition. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active. The location and all other parameters of Sham rTMS will be identical to Active rTMS.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Individuals must exhibit adequate oral communication skills and cognitive function sufficient to obtain a score ranging between 10-27 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (Wu et al., 2022).
3. Instructions will be delivered in English; therefore participants must demonstrate an understanding of instruction provided in English or have a caregiver present who can translate and be presented during all study sessions.
4. Individuals must be able to walk or stand with or without personnel or assistive devices.
5. Individuals must be greater than or equal to 50 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aimee Nelson
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McMaster Unviersity
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17300
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.