Low and High Flow Suctioning in Intubated Infants

NCT ID: NCT06443970

Last Updated: 2025-06-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-04

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preterm and term intubuted infants in the NICU will undergo two sequential suctioning procedures: a new, FDA-approved suction device called EXSALTA (ED) and the standard conventional wall (SCW). The physiological consequences, i.e. changes in heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (C-rSO2), and cerebral fractional oxygen extraction (C-FOE) between ED and SCW ETT tracheal suctioning system in both open and closed catheter system settings will be evaluated using a randomized cross over design in preterm and term infants receiving mechanical ventilation via an ETT. This study will evaluate the hypothesis that there will be significantly lower variations in HR, SpO2, C-rSO2, and C-FOE during ETT suctioning with ED compared to SCW suctioning systems under both open and close ETT suction settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Respiratory failure in neonates frequently requires mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube (ETT). The presence of an ETT inhibits the infant's intrinsic ability to clear endogenous lung secretions effectively with compromised glottic closure and impaired muccociliary function, and thus regular supportive suctioning of the ETT is essential. The benefits of patent airway are evident, but adverse effects may also result from suctioning which are especially deleterious in extremely preterm infants with immature pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic function. These adverse effects include transient hypoxemia and oxygen desaturation, vasovagal reactions, altered central and cerebral hemodynamics, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and mucosal damage. The cardiorespiratory instability during ETT suctioning is partially attributed to alveolar decruitment and loss of lung volume from disconnecting the ETT from the ventilator circuit and negative suction pressure. Maintenance of lung volume is essential to optimize gas exchange and prevent ventilator induced lung injury. The magnitude of lung volume loss is related to catheter size and applied suctioning pressure and flow, highlighting the complexity of interaction between suction technique, lung mechanics and disease state. In accordance with industry standard codes, a high flow rate is essential to ensure the rapid removal of fluid and secretions from the desired site and the standard conventional wall (SCW) suction outlets provide a minimum flow of approximately 85 liters per minute. Such high flows can lead to endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar decruitment that may of significant clinical relevance. Recently, a low flow technology suction device EXSALTA (ED) for clearing ETT secretions in patients on ventilators has been approved by FDA. The device uses peristaltic action to move fluids from the patient to a collection canister at a fixed flow rate of 1.4 L/min and eliminates the uncontrolled flow of air from the patient's lungs. The user selects a desired pressure level that is independent of the flow rate, a feature unavailable with SCW wall suction equipment used at patient's bedside. This exceptional microprocessor-controlled tabletop suction device, available at any suction setting, reduces risk of negative pressures in the lungs to help prevent alveolar collapse and hypoxia associated with standard suctioning techniques. This study will examine the hypothesis that there will be significantly lower variations in heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (C-rSO2), and cerebral fractional oxygen extraction (c-FOE) with ED compared to SCW suction system during open or closed ETT suctioning. To test this hypothesis, the physiological consequences of two ETT suctioning systems in preterm and term infants will be evaluated using the following aims:

AIM 1. To compare the variations in HR (bpm), SpO2 (%), C-rSO2 (%), C-FOE (%) between ED and SCW suctioning systems during routine standard care open and closed ETT suctioning.

AIM II. To compare the incidence (episodes) of cardiorespiratory disturbances, i.e. bradycardia (HR\<80 bpm) and/or hemoglobin oxygen desaturation (SpO2) \< 80% for more than 10s during suctioning with ED and SCW suctioning system during routine standard care open and closed ETT suctioning.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

In each group of study infants (open and closed ETT suctioning), the enrolled subjects will experience ETT suctioning with both methods, i.e. with ED and SCW suctioning systems. Each study infant will undergo two sequential suctioning procedures each day during the two-day study period. On day-1, the infant will be randomly assigned the ED or SCW suctioning device during the first maneuver and the devices will be alternated during the second maneuver. The suctioning device order will be reversed on study day-2 as shown in the study protocol below. In all each infant will have four suctioning maneuvers over two days, two each with ED and SCW suctioning devices.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exsalta Device suctioning

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exsalta Suction Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low flow endotracheal suction device

Coventional wall suctioning

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exsalta Suction Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low flow endotracheal suction device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exsalta Suction Device

Low flow endotracheal suction device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preterm and term infants with birth weight more than 1000g receiving ETT suctioning

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease and cardiac rhythm disorders (arrythmias) will be excluded from the study.
Maximum Eligible Age

28 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rakesh Sahni

Professor of Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rakesh Sahni, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rakesh Sahni, MD

Role: CONTACT

212-305-9743

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rakesh Sahni

Role: primary

212-305-9743

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAU9006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.