ICIT: Recall A Multicentre Study of Consent For Hip Fractures

NCT ID: NCT06439537

Last Updated: 2025-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-15

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hip fractures are a major cause litigation in patients undergoing trauma surgery. Common causes of litigation in hip operations are alleged incompetent surgery and development of pressure sources, both of which are associated with poor quality of consent. One aspect of poor consent is patients not being able to retain information discussed with them prior to their operation. There are many factors attributed to this, including pain in the acute setting, administration of sedating medications and the high rate of delirium in this patient cohort. However, even in individuals deemed to have capacity during the consent process, studies have shown that many were unable to explain what type of surgery they had or express knowledge of the potential complications. Importantly, the hip fracture patient demographic is very different from patients undergoing a planned procedure, in that they have had an acute injury following physical trauma, tend to be older and medically frailer. Research into the recall of patients undergoing gynaecological or abdominal surgeries further corroborate patients' poor recall of potential complications in the acute setting.

Patients with hip fractures face a range of risks, some of which can result in a substantial mortality rate regardless of whether surgery is performed. The list of complications includes infections in the hip joint and wound, development of pressure sores, occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and potential procedural failures. As such, the ability of patients to remember the discussed complications is critical to their well-being and overall quality of life and remains an unmet clinical need.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Improving Consent In Trauma: Recall (ICIT Recall) will be a multicentre quality improvement project within the NHS clinical care setting. The aim of this study is to assess hip fracture patient's ability retain information regarding their injury, proposed operation, potential complications, and alternatives. following obtaining formal written consent. To that end, the project is intended to be a multicentre study, with interviews across a range of different health boards. The investigators also wish to listen to individual patients' experience of the surgical consent process through a follow-up interview once it has been over one week since their operation. Part (1), the structured face-to-face questionnaire was established to identify the extent of the problem and what patients find memorable or overlooked about the consent process. Part (2), the interview was designed to obtain qualitative data on what patients find important and to allow the participants to tell their story. The overarching objective of this project is to empower patients so that they are more involved and have a greater understanding of the operation that they have consented to. This includes simple measures such as providing a patient information leaflet or improving communication with the patient or close family members during their consent process. Sometimes, poor retention of information is unavoidable due to the significant pain and stress patients are under, and for this reason our aim is to improve the quality of consent for major procedures like hip operations.

As part of the project, the investigators also wish to engage with and capture patient-cantered experiences through a further interview. The investigators aim to like to capture their experience of the consent process entirely from the patient's perspective. Patient stories are a powerful tool to promote culture change in patient care. Unlike surveys, patient stories allow a seamless flow of thoughts and feelings that can provide insight into their journey to recovery. Here, the aim is to highlight the importance of good communication and an overall clear consent process in promoting wellbeing. This aspect of care tends to be overlooked. Addressing this issue is particularly important in delivering compassionate care within the NHS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Hip Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-group for all hip fracture patients

Single-group cohort for all hip fracture patients who are candidates for an operation

Semi-structured questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured questionnaire within 36 hours of admission

Post-operative interview

Intervention Type OTHER

All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured interview once they have reached post-operative day 7 or over

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Semi-structured questionnaire

All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured questionnaire within 36 hours of admission

Intervention Type OTHER

Post-operative interview

All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured interview once they have reached post-operative day 7 or over

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inpatient on trauma and orthopaedic wards
* Is candidate for a hip fracture operation
* Able to provide informed consent
* Able to participate in a conversation (without the use of a translator)

Exclusion Criteria

* Deemed to be too unwell or medically unstable to participate
* Under Adult With Incapacity Act or other detaining orders
* Patients scoring a 4AT score of 4 or more
* Unable to provide consent
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NHS Lothian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas Clement, MBBS, MD, PhD, FRCS (T&O)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NHS Lothian

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Lothian

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ring J, Talbot C, Cross C, Hinduja K. NHSLA litigation in hip fractures: Lessons learnt from NHSLA data. Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1853-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28648408 (View on PubMed)

Herrera-Perez M, Gonzalez-Martin D, Sanz EJ, Pais-Brito JL. Ethical Dilemmas with Regard to Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: The Problem of Nonagenarians and Centenarians. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):1851. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071851.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35407459 (View on PubMed)

Zalmay P, Collis J, Wilson H. Patients Lacking the Capacity to Consent to Hip Fracture Surgery May Be Undergoing Major Operations Without Their Next of Kin Being Involved in Best-Interests Decisions: A Quality Improvement Report. Cureus. 2021 Dec 10;13(12):e20322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20322. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35028219 (View on PubMed)

Kalisvaart KJ, Vreeswijk R, de Jonghe JF, van der Ploeg T, van Gool WA, Eikelenboom P. Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients: implementation and validation of a medical risk factor model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):817-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00704.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16696749 (View on PubMed)

Thiruchandran G, McKean AR, Rudran B, Imam MA, Yeong K, Hassan A. Improving consent in patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 May 2;79(5):284-287. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.5.284.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29727232 (View on PubMed)

Probert N, Malik AA, Lovell ME. Surgery for fractured neck of femur - are patients adequately consented? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Jan;89(1):66-9. doi: 10.1308/003588407X160846.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17316526 (View on PubMed)

Bhangu A, Hood E, Datta A, Mangaleshkar S. Is informed consent effective in trauma patients? J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):780-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024471.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18974409 (View on PubMed)

Howard A, Webster J, Quinton N, Giannoudis PV. 'Hobson's choice': a qualitative study of consent in acute surgery. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):e037657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037657.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33033090 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AC23137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.