Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
276 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-16
2025-03-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be randomized to one of two study arms:
Arm 1: the healthcare provider will perform their usual evaluation and tests to make the diagnosis and provide treatment, as needed.
Arm 2: the provider will be asked to use the results of the point-of-care test being used in the study to make the diagnosis and provide treatment, as needed.
Regardless of arm, all diagnoses and treatment will be provided through the healthcare provider. All participants will be contacted 2 weeks later to answer a questionnaire related to diagnosis, treatment, current symptoms, and satisfaction with their visit. Medical records related to vaginal complaints, up to 30 days from enrollment, will be reviewed by the study team to obtain information on symptoms, tests performed, results, and treatments prescribed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing NAAT Testing to Standard Methods for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis
NCT02203942
Performance Study of the Cobas® BV/CV Test on Samples From Participants With and Without Symptoms of Bacterial Vaginosis and Candida Vaginitis
NCT06975436
Comparing Specimen Collection Techniques to Screen for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Pregnant Women: A Pilot Study
NCT03877263
Comparative Performance of a Vaginal Yeast Test
NCT05079711
Point-of-care Tests for Vaginal Discharge in Nepal
NCT05977491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Arm 1, vaginitis diagnosis and treatment will be based on usual provider evaluation and treatment during the office visit. The Xpert® Xpress MVP test will be batched with delayed results made available to the provider following the participant's 2-week study follow-up telephone contact
. Arm 2, the Xpert® Xpress MVP test will be run in real time as a point of care test at the time of the office visit and the results will be made available to the provider in approximately one hour. Providers will be asked to use the MVP test result for diagnosis and treatment of the participant
All participants, regardless of arm, will complete a follow-up telephone contact approximately two weeks after their office visit to assess symptom resolution and satisfaction. Review and collection of electronic medical record information related to the office visit evaluation, testing, diagnosis and treatment will also be included.
A Healthcare Provider Sub study will also be performed. The sub study will include a baseline questionnaire completed by clinicians at participating offices and then a follow-up questionnaire administered to clinicians who provided care for at least one study participant. The sub study will help investigators understand how providers feel about point-of-care testing for vaginitis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Vaginitis diagnosis and treatment will be based on usual provider evaluation and treatment during the office visit
Usual Care
Usual methods used by the healthcare provider for vaginitis diagnosis
Same Day Results
the Xpert® Xpress MVP test will be run in real time as a point of care test at the time of the office visit and the results will be made available to the provider in approximately one hour. Providers will be asked to use the MVP test result for diagnosis and treatment of the participant.
Xpert® Xpress MVP test
The Xpert® Xpress MVP is an FDA-cleared point-of-care test for vaginitis diagnosis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xpert® Xpress MVP test
The Xpert® Xpress MVP is an FDA-cleared point-of-care test for vaginitis diagnosis
Usual Care
Usual methods used by the healthcare provider for vaginitis diagnosis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Seeking care at one of the participating offices.
* Able and willing to provide informed consent.
* Willing to undergo all study-related assessments and procedures, including self-collection of vaginal swabs, answering questions/surveys, agreeing to the review and collection of information from their medical record from the office (enrollment/index) visit and up to 4 weeks after the office visit.
* Able and willing to provide informed consent
* Provided clinical care to at least one study participant on the date of their study enrollment
* Willing to undergo all study-related assessments including answering questions/surveys
Exclusion Criteria
* Any condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude provision of consent, make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives
Healthcare Provider Sub-study
14 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cepheid
INDUSTRY
Sharon L Hillier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sharon L Hillier
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharon L Hillier, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hillier SL, Austin M, Macio I, Meyn LA, Badway D, Beigi R. Diagnosis and Treatment of Vaginal Discharge Syndromes in Community Practice Settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):1538-1543. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa260.
Schwebke JR, Gaydos CA, Nyirjesy P, Paradis S, Kodsi S, Cooper CK. Diagnostic Performance of a Molecular Test versus Clinician Assessment of Vaginitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6):e00252-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00252-18. Print 2018 Jun.
Wiesenfeld HC, Macio I. The infrequent use of office-based diagnostic tests for vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;181(1):39-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70433-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY24010118
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.