Efficacy of a Proactive Approach to Death Thoughts in People with Advanced Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06420609

Last Updated: 2025-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-14

Study Completion Date

2025-12-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of a proactive intervention to approach death thoughts among people with advanced cancer compared to usual care (the reactive approach) via a feasible approach with previous indicators of efficacy: Go-TAD (Give the Opportunity to Talk about Death). The benefits of the intervention will be evaluated in terms of: reduction of emotional distress and hopelessness and improvement the doctor-patient relationship, as well as improvement of quality of life for the patient. A Phase II randomized controlled mixed methods clinical trial (RCT) will be carried out within 4 Palliative Care units of tertiary care hospitals in Catalonia. Participants will be persons with advanced cancer defined according to the criteria of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or control group. In the intervention group, the participants will receive a medical visit that will include the 4 open-ended questions comprising the Go-TAD intervention, while the control group will receive usual care. Between 24 and 96 hours later, a researcher from outside the center will assess study outcome measures. To strengthen the study conclusions, a qualitative study will be carried out in which the experiences of the participants in the intervention group and of their professionals who administered the Go-TAD will be explored in depth.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Death Advanced Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
This study proposes a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) with a stepped-wedge design, in which 6 palliative care units from second and third level hospitals in Spain will collaborate. The six units will contribute with both experimental and control participants, starting with the recruitment of the control group participants and subsequently starting the intervention group. The time at which they will transition to the intervention will be chosen at random. The centers will be randomized to know at what point in the study they should begin the intervention and each center will be informed of the number of patients they should include in each of the groups. The clusters correspond to the different palliative care units that participate in the study. Six sequences will be carried out, seven periods with 4 patients in each period. Patients will be different in each of the periods.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Go-TAD

the participants will receive a medical visit that will include the 4 open-ended questions comprising the Go-TAD intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Go-TAD

Intervention Type OTHER

The participants will receive a medical visit that will include the 4 open-ended questions comprising the Go-TAD intervention

CONTROL

the participants will receive a medical visit that will include the 4 open-ended questions comprising hobbies and other personal themes, but not death.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Go-TAD

The participants will receive a medical visit that will include the 4 open-ended questions comprising the Go-TAD intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. patients with advanced cancer defined according to ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) criteria referred for the initial palliative care (PC) consultation.
2. age over 18 years
3. ECOG 0-3 (functionality status)
4. outpatients and inpatients
5. patients who can sign the informed consent
6. patients with the ability to maintain a conversation

Exclusion Criteria

1. patients with acute symptoms that may affect their consciousness.
2. patients with any uncontrolled symptoms that prevent collaboration in the study assessed according to clinical judgment
3. moderate or severe cognitive impairment assessed according to clinical judgment
4. patients included in another incompatible clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Català d'Oncologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundacion Rioja Salud

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Iris Crespo Martin

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee JJ, Liu DD. A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2008;5(2):93-106. doi: 10.1177/1740774508089279.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18375647 (View on PubMed)

Limonero JT, Mateo D, Mate-Mendez J, Gonzalez-Barboteo J, Bayes R, Bernaus M, Casas C, Lopez M, Sirgo A, Viel S. [Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Detection of Emotional Distress Scale in cancer patients]. Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Oct 26. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22033008 (View on PubMed)

Martin-Fernandez J, del Cura-Gonzalez MI, Gomez-Gascon T, Fernandez-Lopez E, Pajares-Carabajal G, Moreno-Jimenez B. [Patient satisfaction with the patient-doctor relationship measured using the questionnaire (PDRQ-9)]. Aten Primaria. 2010 Apr;42(4):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.09.026. Epub 2010 Feb 8. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20116893 (View on PubMed)

Crespo I, Monforte-Royo C, Balaguer A, Pergolizzi D, Cruz-Sequeiros C, Luque-Blanco A, Porta-Sales J. Screening for the Desire to Die in the First Palliative Care Encounter: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;24(4):570-573. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0276. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32945714 (View on PubMed)

Serra-Prat M, Nabal M, Santacruz V, Picaza JM, Trelis J; Grupo Catalan de Estudio de la Efectividad de los Cuidados Paliativos. [Validation of the Spanish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale]. Med Clin (Barc). 2004 Oct 2;123(11):406-12. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(04)74535-2. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15482713 (View on PubMed)

Porta-Sales J, Crespo I, Monforte-Royo C, Marin M, Abenia-Chavarria S, Balaguer A. The clinical evaluation of the wish to hasten death is not upsetting for advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):570-577. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824526. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30688146 (View on PubMed)

Julia-Torras J, Garcia-Salanova A, Monforte-Royo C, Jimeno Ariztia M, Balaguer A, Crespo I. Impact of proactively inviting people with advanced cancer to talk about the end of life: a randomised clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e104195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104195.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40659391 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PI22/01536

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.