Evidence Development in Cancer Treatment - Real World: PREDiCTrw

NCT ID: NCT06242912

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-22

Study Completion Date

2029-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This pilot clinical trial aims to assess the real world quality of life and survival of patients treated with therapy that has preliminary evidence of efficacy but uncertainty of the magnitude of clinical benefit or cost effectiveness in subjects with cancer. The goal of this study is to collect real world evidence with respect to quality of life and outcomes to support decision making.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Clinical practice involves incorporating new data into treatment recommendations including non randomized phase I/II studies. Clinicians' decision-making is swayed by alternative endpoints like response rate (RR), depth of response and progression free survival (PFS), presumed to be surrogates for overall survival (OS). Determination of the added value of these new therapies in terms of outcomes and quality of life (QOL) is challenging in the absence of comparators in trials resulting in increased uncertainty in terms of outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

With the possibility of a randomized clinical trial evidence being low in certain populations, the use of real world data (RWD) can provide information regarding therapies with preliminary evidence of efficacy but uncertainty of the magnitude of clinical benefit or cost effectiveness. With RWD, patients may receive access to therapies and participate in the evidence generation package.

This study proposes to use RWD to generate evidence to evaluate therapies with preliminary evidence of efficacy but uncertainty of the magnitude of clinical benefit or cost effectiveness. The key components include regular interval disease assessments (eg radiographic imaging) and collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) using standardized QOL questionnaires. The aim is to provide high quality real world evidence (RWE) for assessment and economic modelling to reduce uncertainty and facilitate decision-making.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Therapy

Regular disease assessment (eg radiographic imaging) and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

QOL - quality of life

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

QOL assessments using EQ5D (Euroqol 5 dimension) +/- ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) +/- CPC (Canadian Problem Checklist) every 4-8 weeks +/- 2 weeks

Radiographic or laboratory evaluation

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Radiographic or laboratory evaluation every 12 weeks +/- 2 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

QOL - quality of life

QOL assessments using EQ5D (Euroqol 5 dimension) +/- ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) +/- CPC (Canadian Problem Checklist) every 4-8 weeks +/- 2 weeks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Radiographic or laboratory evaluation

Radiographic or laboratory evaluation every 12 weeks +/- 2 weeks

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with cancer for which there remains ongoing questions regarding clinical effectiveness and/or cost effectiveness regarding a therapeutic agent
* Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) 0-2
* Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
* Adequate hematologic and end organ function for drug treatment per the clinician's assessment
* Asymptomatic or treated brain metastases permitted
* For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive methods that result in a failure rate of less than 1% per year during the treatment period and for at least 5 months after the last dose.
* For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse with a female partner of childbearing potential or who is pregnant) or use contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm, during the treatment period and for at least 5 months after the last dose.
* Ability to give informed consent for the study procedures defined in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with any approved or investigational agent or participation in another clinical trial with therapeutic intent within 14 days prior to enrollment.
* Inability to complete quality of life questionnaires
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Any significant cardiovascular disease, comorbidity (i.e. recent major infection, HIV, tuberculosis) or major surgical procedure within 21 days that in the opinion of the investigator renders the proposed treatment unsafe.
* Subjects who are otherwise felt by the treating clinician to be unfit to proceed with this protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

British Columbia Cancer Agency

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cheryl Ho, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

BC Cancer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

BC Cancer

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cheryl Ho, MD

Role: CONTACT

604 877 6000

Howard Lim, MD

Role: CONTACT

604 877 6000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fatima Usman

Role: primary

604 877 6000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PREDiCTrw

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Personality and Cancer Care Study
NCT04625439 COMPLETED NA
Time Restricted Eating in Survivors Trial 2.0
NCT07259434 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA