Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes: Endoscopic vs. Conventional Craniotomy for Frontal Skull Base Lesions
NCT ID: NCT06417658
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-02-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Predictive Factors of Vision Recovery in Patients With Pituitary Tumor
NCT01377701
Intra-operative Variation in Size of Brain Tumors After Craniotomy
NCT04365647
Skull Base Reconstruction After Endonasal Cranio-endoscopic Resection Using Autologus Grafts
NCT03448614
Application of Augmented Reality Neuronavigation in Transnasal Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery
NCT06282224
Assessment of Facial Symmetry After Facial Reconstruction Using Three-dimensional Stereophotogrammetry
NCT06534970
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Surgical Approaches: The study will compare two different techniques: the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy, which is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure involving a small incision within the eyebrow to access anterior skull base pathologies, and the conventional frontal craniotomy, a traditional approach involving a larger incision.
2. Purpose: The primary objective will be to assess and compare the cosmetic outcomes, particularly scar appearance and related complications, between these two surgical methods. The emphasis will lie on evaluating parameters such as scar spread, erythema, suture marks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression using the Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating (SCAR) scale.
3. Study Protocol:
Random Allocation: Patients will be randomly assigned to either the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy group or the conventional frontal craniotomy group.
Preoperative Assessment: Comprehensive preoperative evaluations will be conducted to ascertain baseline data and ensure suitability for surgery.
Surgery: Patients will undergo the assigned surgical procedure based on random allocation.
Postoperative Follow-up: Close monitoring of patients post-surgery to assess scar healing and detect any complications.
Data Collection: Data regarding scar assessment, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and other relevant parameters will be collected at specified intervals.
Statistical Analysis: Rigorous statistical analysis of collected data will be conducted to draw comparisons and conclusions regarding cosmetic outcomes between the two surgical approaches.
4. Patient-Reported Outcomes: In addition to clinician-assessed scar parameters, the study will also consider patient-reported outcomes such as itch and pain, providing a comprehensive understanding of the patient experience following these surgical interventions.
5. Significance: The study will underscore the significance of evaluating cosmetic outcomes in neurosurgical procedures, aiming to enhance patient satisfaction and inform treatment decisions. By comparing the two surgical approaches, the research will seek to contribute valuable insights that may lead to the refinement of surgical techniques and improved patient care.
Overall, this proposed research endeavors to offer a detailed examination of the cosmetic results associated with endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy versus conventional frontal craniotomy, thereby facilitating informed decision-making and optimizing patient outcomes in the management of frontal skull base lesions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy
his minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure accesses brain tumors by making a small incision within the eyebrow, providing access to pathologies of the anterior skull base. Compared to traditional frontal craniotomy, this approach aims to minimize tissue disruption, potentially reducing postoperative complications and improving cosmetic outcomes. The procedure involves precise surgical techniques guided by endoscopic visualization, allowing for targeted tumor resection while preserving surrounding healthy tissue. Additionally, the use of smaller incisions may lead to reduced scarring and faster recovery times compared to conventional approaches.
Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy
The Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure used to access and remove brain tumors located in the anterior skull base region. In this approach, surgeons make a small incision within the eyebrow area to gain access to the underlying pathology, avoiding larger incisions and more extensive tissue disruption associated with traditional open craniotomies.
Conventional Frontal Craniotomy
This arm represents the standard surgical approach for treating frontal skull base lesions. In this arm, surgeons perform the craniotomy through a conventional frontal approach rather than the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow approach. This arm serves as the comparator against the experimental arm to evaluate the differences in cosmetic outcomes, scar assessment, and complications between the two surgical techniques.
Conventional Frontal Craniotomy
The Conventional Frontal Craniotomy is a traditional surgical approach used to access and treat lesions located in the frontal region of the skull base. In this procedure, surgeons make a single or multiple large incisions in the scalp overlying the frontal bone to gain access to the underlying pathology.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy
The Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure used to access and remove brain tumors located in the anterior skull base region. In this approach, surgeons make a small incision within the eyebrow area to gain access to the underlying pathology, avoiding larger incisions and more extensive tissue disruption associated with traditional open craniotomies.
Conventional Frontal Craniotomy
The Conventional Frontal Craniotomy is a traditional surgical approach used to access and treat lesions located in the frontal region of the skull base. In this procedure, surgeons make a single or multiple large incisions in the scalp overlying the frontal bone to gain access to the underlying pathology.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Lesion size \<5cm on MRI with IV contrast
3. Both male and female
4. 25-65 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lesion size \>5cm
3. Vascular tumors
4. Previous trauma
5. Anticoagulant medications
6. Comorbidities(uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes)
7. Skin diseases
25 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Health Sciences Lahore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Syeda Ayesha Hashmi
Post Graduate Resident
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Exp122
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.