Artificial Intelligence Versus Maunal Planning in Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06416631
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-25
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does the AI technology shorter the mannual planning time of screw trajectories? Does the AI technology affect the surgical accuracy? Researchers will compare the artificial intelligence technology to the conventional mannual planning in robotic surgery.
Participants who met inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criterion will be randomized to artificial intelligence or mannual planning group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial for the Application of Robotic System in Spinal Surgery
NCT03512379
Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery
NCT04133103
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Implantable Wireless Brain-Computer Interface(BCI)System NEO in Patients With Tetraplegia
NCT06990412
Artificial Intelligence Model for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Based on Radiomics and Genomics
NCT06436716
Identification of Outcome Predictors and Stratification of Responder Profiles Implanted With Spinal Cord Stimulation. An AI-based-pathway & Algorithmic Approach to Treat Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients
NCT04587674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing robotic spinal surgery.
Monitoring:
Monitoring of patient's safety and effectiveness data is performed by a designated independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB watches over the ethics of conducting the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Sample Size Calculation:
Group size calculation is focused on demonstrating non-inferiority. Assuming that the percentage of clinically acceptable screws would be 90% in the artificial intelligence planning group and 95% in the manual planning group, with a non-inferiority margin of 10% and a one-sided significance level of 2.5%, we calculated that a sample of 79 screws per treatment group would give the trial approximately 95% power to show noninferiority of artificial intelligence planning group to manual planning group with regard to the primary end point.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
artificial intelligence planning group
artificial intelligence based screw planning
artificial intelligence technology helps to plan screws in robot assisted spinal surgery
manual planning group
manually screw planning
the screw trajcetories are manually planned
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
artificial intelligence based screw planning
artificial intelligence technology helps to plan screws in robot assisted spinal surgery
manually screw planning
the screw trajcetories are manually planned
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Need for and start of robotic spinal surgery
* Patients had complete medical records and imaging data;
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with severe comorbidities;
* Patients diagnosed with tumor diseases;
* Inability to carry out the intervention (mental of physical conditions that limited participation);
* Patients with morbid obesity (body mass index \> 40);
* Missing medical records and imaging data;
* Patients with suspected or confirmed pregnancy;
* Patients participating in another RCT with the same clinical endpoint, or interventions possibly compromising the primary outcome;
* No informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AI-RASS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.