Assessing the Implementation of Myofascial Techniques in Patients With Accessory Nerve Damage After Oncologic Treatment
NCT ID: NCT06397742
Last Updated: 2024-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
57 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-01
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As a consequence of radical surgery affecting the lymphatic system in the neck area, there exists a risk of damage to the cervical plexus branch (C1-C4) or the accessory nerve. Patients with damage to this nerve develop disability involving limitations to the head flexion, extension, and rotation, asymmetric shoulder blades, disturbed shoulder joint abduction, flexion, and external rotation (supination). Additionally, patients often suffer from pain, numbness, swelling, and body asymmetry.
Subject literature does not describe in a detailed and comprehensive way the physiotherapeutic procedures to be applied in case of a damaged accessory nerve as a complication after cancer treatment. Unfortunately, it is often related to patients' limited access to an effective therapy. Available information on the rehabilitation procedures is limited and it mostly focuses on exercise recommendations. An analysis of the subject literature does not show any information on the efficiency of applying the myofascial techniques for treating deficiencies related to the damage of the accessory nerve.
In the current project the investigators plan to assess the effectiveness of a physical therapy intervention comprising myofascial techniques as compared to a set of exercises designed for performing individually in head and neck cancer patients with accessory nerve damage after surgical head and neck cancer treatment. The primary outcome will be physiotherapeutic procedures to be applied in case of a damaged accessory nerve as a complication after cancer treatment. The secondary outcomes will include the efficiency of applying the myofascial techniques for treating deficiencies related to the damage of the accessory nerve.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Effects of Physiotherapy Interventions on Mechanical Properties of Muscle in Head and Neck Cancer
NCT05399953
Resistance Exercise Training for the Shoulder and Neck Following Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00248235
Myofascial Release of the Pectoral Fascia
NCT04944745
Manual Therapy and Movement Control Exercises for Chronic Neck Pain. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06189612
Neck Strengthening in Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain
NCT06077084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As a consequence of radical surgery affecting the lymphatic system in the neck area, there exists a risk of damage to the cervical plexus branch (C1-C4) or the accessory nerve. However, depending on the cancer stage, in numerous cases it is possible to successfully save bodily structures and maintain continuation of nerves.
The analysis of complications shows that about 80% of patients communicate subjective discomforts of upper limb on the side of the surgery. After surgery treatment including lymphadenectomy (lymph node dissection) in the head and neck area, 60% of patients suffer from the damage or dysfunction of the accessory nerve.
As a consequence, there are numerous symptoms limiting the normal functioning of a patient. Among the most frequent symptoms of accessory nerve damage is a muscle dysfunction on the side of the nerve damage (trapezius muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle). As a result of the accessory nerve damage, patients develop disability due to limitations to the head flexion, extension, and rotation, asymmetric shoulder blades, disturbed shoulder joint abduction, flexion, and external rotation (supination). Additionally, patients suffer from pain, numbness, swelling, and body asymmetry. Subject literature does not describe in a detailed and comprehensive way the physiotherapeutic procedures to be applied in case of a damaged accessory nerve as a complication after cancer treatment. Unfortunately, endurance of the impairment is often related to patients' limited access to an effective therapy
Purpose of the research:
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a physical therapy intervention comprising myofascial techniques as compared to a set of exercises designed for performing individually in head and neck cancer patients with accessory nerve dysfunction after surgical head and neck cancer treatment. The study will include patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer with one-sided lymphadenectomy in the head and neck region who present with pain, restricted mobility or muscle atrophy. Recruited patients will be divided into one of two groups: the first group will receive physical therapy including myofascial techniques performed by the physical therapist three times a week for 45 minutes, and the second group will receive a specially designed set of exercises to perform at home three times a week for 45 minutes. The intervention will last six weeks and patients will be assessed before and after intervention. Patient's neuromuscular condition will be examined using surface electromyography (sEMG), pain at rest, during shoulder flexion, and on trapezius muscle palpation will be measured using Visual Analogue Scale, and quality of life will be assessed using modified Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) questionnaire.
Specific aims:
* To create an algorithm of physiotherapeutic procedures in case of the dysfunction of the accessory nerve and related complications.
* To assess the effect of applied techniques on the mobility of the cervical section of the spine.
* To assess the influence of the therapy on the mobility of the shoulder girdle on the post-surgery side.
* To assess the influence of the therapy on patients' pain related discomfort.
* To assess the feasibility of applying sEMG (surface electromyography) to verify the efficiency of the therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
All patients from the study group were treated at the Head and Neck Surgery and Laryngological Oncology Clinic at the Poznań University of Medical Science.
The study group comprised 9 women and 16 men with an average of 51.1 y.o., and the control group comprised 6 women and 17 men with an average of 50,8y.o.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Physical activity under supervision
The subjects receive physical therapy three times a week for 45 minutes, during a six-week period under professional supervision.
Physical therapy - myofascial techniques
Physical therapy program comprised five parts. I. Fascial manipulation targeted three most active center of coordination - center of fusion points within head, neck, shoulder, shoulder blade, or chest - during each session, time depending on the patients' adaptability.
II. Manual mobilization of the scar area with each training session including: active myofascial stretching; manual scar mobilization by stretching perpendicularly and in parallel with the scar; soft tissue mobilization by rolling and pulling the surface tissues; myofascial relaxation by breaking through restrictions.
III. Relaxation of muscle contractures using post-isometric muscle relaxation of the scalene muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle, and neck muscles - until the sessions provided no muscle elongation.
IV. Neuromuscular stimulation with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation - included scapula movement patterns, dynamic reversal, stabilizing reversal, upper extremity movement patterns.
Home exercise
The subjects receive a set of exercises and a recommendation to perform them at least three times a week for 45 minutes.
To ensure compliance the subjects receive journals to record the performed exercises. Additionally subjects are contacted by phone to motivate them to exercise with adequate intensity. Furthermore the proper exercise technique is verified at periodic control visits.
Physical activity
Patients received a set of exercises to execute at home. The home exercise program comprised 12 exercises conducted in sequence:
1. Symmetrical shoulder raises with retraction
2. Rolling upper extremities using a ball
3. Symmetrical shoulder raises
4. Band exercises strengthening the upper girdle and arm
5. Exercise of the shoulder joint flexors
6. Side arm raises in supine position
7. Lateral arm raises in supine position
8. Head raises with rotation in supine position
9. Side arm raises in prone position
10. Front arm raises in prone position
11. Rising and lowering the upper girdle in prone position
12. Neck muscles stretches
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical activity
Patients received a set of exercises to execute at home. The home exercise program comprised 12 exercises conducted in sequence:
1. Symmetrical shoulder raises with retraction
2. Rolling upper extremities using a ball
3. Symmetrical shoulder raises
4. Band exercises strengthening the upper girdle and arm
5. Exercise of the shoulder joint flexors
6. Side arm raises in supine position
7. Lateral arm raises in supine position
8. Head raises with rotation in supine position
9. Side arm raises in prone position
10. Front arm raises in prone position
11. Rising and lowering the upper girdle in prone position
12. Neck muscles stretches
Physical therapy - myofascial techniques
Physical therapy program comprised five parts. I. Fascial manipulation targeted three most active center of coordination - center of fusion points within head, neck, shoulder, shoulder blade, or chest - during each session, time depending on the patients' adaptability.
II. Manual mobilization of the scar area with each training session including: active myofascial stretching; manual scar mobilization by stretching perpendicularly and in parallel with the scar; soft tissue mobilization by rolling and pulling the surface tissues; myofascial relaxation by breaking through restrictions.
III. Relaxation of muscle contractures using post-isometric muscle relaxation of the scalene muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle, and neck muscles - until the sessions provided no muscle elongation.
IV. Neuromuscular stimulation with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation - included scapula movement patterns, dynamic reversal, stabilizing reversal, upper extremity movement patterns.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* symptoms of damage to the accessory nerve,
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale 0-2,
Exclusion Criteria
* distant metastases,
* cardiorespiratory failure,
* pain symptoms exceeding patients adaptability,
* decline of the patient's level of functioning to 3-4 in ECOG scale.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Greater Poland Cancer Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maciej Górecki, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Greater Poland Cancer Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ewa Tanska
Poznan, Polska, Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhattacharyya N. The increasing workload in head and neck surgery: An epidemiologic analysis. Laryngoscope. 2011 Jan;121(1):111-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.21193.
Popovski V, Benedetti A, Popovic-Monevska D, Grcev A, Stamatoski A, Zhivadinovik J. Spinal accessory nerve preservation in modified neck dissections: surgical and functional outcomes. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017 Oct;37(5):368-374. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-844.
Marszałek W.S., Majchrzycki M., Golusiński W.: Dysfunctions of the locomotor system. Physiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Poznan: Poznan University of Medical Sciences Publishing House, 2012, ISBN: 978-83-7597-161-3
Guru K, Manoor UK, Supe SS. A comprehensive review of head and neck cancer rehabilitation: physical therapy perspectives. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012 May;18(2):87-97. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.100820.
Goldstein DP, Ringash J, Bissada E, Jaquet Y, Irish J, Chepeha D, Davis AM. Scoping review of the literature on shoulder impairments and disability after neck dissection. Head Neck. 2014 Feb;36(2):299-308. doi: 10.1002/hed.23243. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
Dijkstra PU, van Wilgen PC, Buijs RP, Brendeke W, de Goede CJ, Kerst A, Koolstra M, Marinus J, Schoppink EM, Stuiver MM, van de Velde CF, Roodenburg JL. Incidence of shoulder pain after neck dissection: a clinical explorative study for risk factors. Head Neck. 2001 Nov;23(11):947-53. doi: 10.1002/hed.1137.
Koybasioglu A, Bora Tokcaer A, Inal E, Uslu S, Kocak T, Ural A. Accessory nerve function in lateral selective neck dissection with undissected level IIb. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68(2):88-92. doi: 10.1159/000091209. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
Carvalho AP, Vital FM, Soares BG. Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD008693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008693.pub2.
Day JA, Stecco C, Stecco A. Application of Fascial Manipulation technique in chronic shoulder pain--anatomical basis and clinical implications. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2009 Apr;13(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.04.044. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
Laska T, Hannig K. Physical therapy for spinal accessory nerve injury complicated by adhesive capsulitis. Phys Ther. 2001 Mar;81(3):936-44.
McGarvey AC, Osmotherly PG, Hoffman GR, Chiarelli PE. Impact of neck dissection on scapular muscle function: a case-controlled electromyographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;94(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
McGarvey AC, Hoffman GR, Osmotherly PG, Chiarelli PE. Maximizing shoulder function after accessory nerve injury and neck dissection surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Head Neck. 2015 Jul;37(7):1022-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.23712. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
Hindle KB, Whitcomb TJ, Briggs WO, Hong J. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF): Its Mechanisms and Effects on Range of Motion and Muscular Function. J Hum Kinet. 2012 Mar;31:105-13. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0011-y. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Gane EM, McPhail SM, Hatton AL, Panizza BJ, O'Leary SP. The relationship between physical impairments, quality of life and disability of the neck and upper limb in patients following neck dissection. J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):619-631. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0697-5. Epub 2018 May 16.
Tarkan Ö., Tuncer Ü., Bozdemir H., Sarpel T., Özdemir S., Surmelioglu Ö.: Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of shoulder functions in spinal accessory nerve-preserving neck dissection. Turk J Med Sci, 2012; 42(5): 852-860
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHYSIOACCESS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.