Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2023-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Mulligan Mobilization Technique
NCT05074576
The Effects of Mulligan Mobilization Technique in Older Adults With Neck Pain
NCT03507907
Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization Technique And Cervical Stabilization Training in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
NCT04643028
Mobilization With Movement Technique on the Stiffness of Cervical Muscles in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06396104
Effect of Manual Therapy on Non Specific Neck Pain
NCT06200038
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mulligan mobilization technique
The participants received MMT from the physiotherapist.
Mulligan mobilization
The SNAGS technique was applied to 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 15-30 seconds rest between sets while the participants were in a sitting position. A physiotherapist applied passive motion to facet joints at each spinal level. The participant was questioned in which direction he/she felt pain during cervical ROM and the application was carried out in the painful/limited directions.
Self-Mobilization
For the self-mobilization technique, each participant was asked to extend a pain-free while pushing upwards from the transverse processes of the treated vertebra with the thumbs of both hands. In addition, the middle or index finger of the right hand was asked to pull the treated vertebra to the right side, while at the same time, left rotation was asked at the pain limit. Self-mobilization was applied every day, twice a day, five times.
Self-mobilization techniques
The second group was trained only self-mobilization technique.
Self-Mobilization
For the self-mobilization technique, each participant was asked to extend a pain-free while pushing upwards from the transverse processes of the treated vertebra with the thumbs of both hands. In addition, the middle or index finger of the right hand was asked to pull the treated vertebra to the right side, while at the same time, left rotation was asked at the pain limit. Self-mobilization was applied every day, twice a day, five times.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mulligan mobilization
The SNAGS technique was applied to 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 15-30 seconds rest between sets while the participants were in a sitting position. A physiotherapist applied passive motion to facet joints at each spinal level. The participant was questioned in which direction he/she felt pain during cervical ROM and the application was carried out in the painful/limited directions.
Self-Mobilization
For the self-mobilization technique, each participant was asked to extend a pain-free while pushing upwards from the transverse processes of the treated vertebra with the thumbs of both hands. In addition, the middle or index finger of the right hand was asked to pull the treated vertebra to the right side, while at the same time, left rotation was asked at the pain limit. Self-mobilization was applied every day, twice a day, five times.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karabuk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tarik Ozmen
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tarik Ozmen
Karabük, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alansari SM, Youssef EF, Shanb AA. Efficacy of manual therapy on psychological status and pain in patients with neck pain. A randomized clinical trial. Saudi Med J. 2021 Jan;42(1):82-90. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.1.25589.
Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B, Sas S, Kararti C, Ceylan I. The Effect of Mulligan Mobilization Technique in Older Adults with Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Pain Res Manag. 2018 May 15;2018:2856375. doi: 10.1155/2018/2856375. eCollection 2018.
Ganesh GS, Mohanty P, Pattnaik M, Mishra C. Effectiveness of mobilization therapy and exercises in mechanical neck pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 Feb;31(2):99-106. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.963904. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Physiotherapy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.