Novel Intervention to Improve Food Insecurity Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder

NCT ID: NCT06374303

Last Updated: 2025-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-19

Study Completion Date

2023-11-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The adverse consequences of illicit opioid use (e.g., overdose, premature death) are the focus of intensive research efforts. However, other serious health problems among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) have received far less attention. Food insecurity (FI) is 4-7 times greater among individuals with OUD than the general population. In addition to the increased healthcare utilization and costs, poor health outcomes, and adverse social consequences associated with FI in the general population, patients with co-occurring FI and OUD are at increased risk for licit and illicit drug use, sexual and drug risk behaviors, infectious disease, and a two-fold greater odds of premature death.

In this randomized pilot study, we evaluated a novel, mail-based meal delivery intervention for improving household FI and other outcomes among individuals receiving methadone or buprenorphine maintenance for OUD.

Fifty adults with FI and OUD were randomized to one of two 12-week experimental conditions: Nutritional Education (NE) participants received brief education, a list of FI-related resources in their community, and assistance with contacting those resources. NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) participants received the same educational platform plus weekly meal deliveries using a commercial service that delivers premade, refrigerated meals directly to the participant's home.

The primary outcome of household FI was measured at monthly assessments using the USDA Household Food Security Survey. Secondary measures included depression symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory), quality of life (RAND-36 Quality of Life Survey), and drug use as measured by biochemical urinalysis.

The NE+MD intervention was associated with significant improvements in household FI, with fewer NE+MD participants meeting criteria for FI vs. NE participants at all three assessment timepoints (p's\<.05). Retention rates were similar between the two groups (88% and 84% for NE+MD and NE conditions, respectively; p=.68). Intervention acceptability was also high, with NE+MD participants rating the enjoyment and convenience of the meals at 81 and 93, respectively (range: 0-100).

Changes in FI status were also associated with improvements in other areas of functioning. NE+MD participants experienced reductions in depression symptomatology, with Beck Depression Inventory scores lower than intake at Weeks 4 and 8 (p's\<.05) and no changes among NE participants. NE+MD participants also experienced improvements on four of the eight subscales of the RAND-36 Quality of Life Health Survey (i.e., General Health, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, Role Emotional; p's\<.05), with no changes among NE participants.

This study represents the first effort to develop and evaluate a novel intervention to reduce FI and related problems among individuals with OUD. These pilot data support the feasibility, acceptability and initial efficacy of the NE+MD intervention for improving household FI, as well as provide exciting new preliminary evidence suggesting that FI may be linked to participants' mental and physical health.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Security

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, parallel-groups pilot study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nutritional Education (NE) control condition

Nutritional Education (NE) participants received brief education, a list of FI-related resources in their community, and assistance with contacting those resources.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Nutritional Eduction + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) experimental condition

NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) participants received the same educational platform plus weekly meal deliveries using a commercial service that delivers premade, refrigerated meals directly to the participant's home.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) participants received the same educational platform plus weekly meal deliveries using a commercial service that delivers premade, refrigerated meals directly to the participant's home.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) intervention

NE + Meal Delivery (NE+MD) participants received the same educational platform plus weekly meal deliveries using a commercial service that delivers premade, refrigerated meals directly to the participant's home.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>18 years old
* receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment for OUD
* meet criteria for current FI as measured by the 18-item US Household Food Security Survey (FSS; Economic Research Service, USDA, 2012)

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant psychiatric or medical illness
* Pregnant or nursing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stacey C. Sigmon

Professor, PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stacey Sigmon, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Vermont

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHRBSS 00001940

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Psilocybin for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
NCT06796062 RECRUITING PHASE2