Intervention to Expand Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Pharmacotherapy Prescribers
NCT ID: NCT02926482
Last Updated: 2024-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-26
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
To Test a Payer/Treatment Agency Intervention to Increase Use of Buprenorphine
NCT01702142
Nudges and Incentives to Enhance the Opioid Treatment Workforce
NCT03834025
Piloting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Opioid Use Disorder Recovery in a Clinical Setting
NCT05388045
Usability Testing for the Reward-based Technology to Improve OUD Treatment
NCT05159362
Long-Term Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
NCT05534815
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will address this emerging need to increase access to buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone by testing a bundle of practices, called the Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB), which aims to recruit prescribers licensed to prescribe buprenorphine to work with addiction treatment organizations. The PRB consists of the following elements, a) candidate identification strategies, b) prescriber education forums, c) prescriber-friendly workflow and risk-reduction strategies, d) academic detailing to recruit OUD prescribers, e) telemedicine to provide access to OUD pharmacotherapies, and f) organizational leadership and culture to support building OUD pharmacotherapy capacity.
In this cluster randomized controlled trial, the primary research question is to test the impact of the PRB implemented in conjunction with the NIATx organizational change model, relative to the control, on increasing the number of buprenorphine treatment slots and extended-release naltrexone capacity and increasing the number of patients receiving buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone in the participating addiction treatment organizations. The secondary research question is to test if the PRB affects factors likely to be associated with prescriber recruitment, including: resources dedicated to prescriber recruitment, prescriber recruiter motivation, and current employed physician satisfaction. Lastly, qualitative methods will be used to study the context and processes that influence PRB adoption and fidelity and to understand and develop a deeper understanding of how the PRB influences recruitment beyond the existing study variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
This arm will include 35 organizations who receive access to the Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB) materials online via a secure website.
No interventions assigned to this group
PRB: organizations implementing the PRB
This arm will include 35 organizations that will implement the intervention, the Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB) using the NIATx Organizational Change Model (a model developed by our center research team).
Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB)
The Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB) is a bundle pharmacotherapy capacity building practices. The PRB to be implemented contains the following elements, a) candidate identification strategies, b) prescriber education forums, c) prescriber-friendly workflow and risk-reduction strategies, d) academic detailing to recruit OUD prescribers, e) telemedicine, and f) organizational leadership and culture to support building OUD pharmacotherapy capacity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB)
The Prescriber Recruitment Bundle (PRB) is a bundle pharmacotherapy capacity building practices. The PRB to be implemented contains the following elements, a) candidate identification strategies, b) prescriber education forums, c) prescriber-friendly workflow and risk-reduction strategies, d) academic detailing to recruit OUD prescribers, e) telemedicine, and f) organizational leadership and culture to support building OUD pharmacotherapy capacity.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Organizations in the states of Florida, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Todd Molfenter
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Florida Alcohol and Drug Abuse Association
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Center for Health Enhancement Systems
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen LH, Hedegaard H, Warner M. Drug-poisoning Deaths Involving Opioid Analgesics: United States, 1999-2011. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Sep;(166):1-8.
Berglund M. A better widget? Three lessons for improving addiction treatment from a meta-analytical study. Addiction. 2005 Jun;100(6):742-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01106.x.
Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 6;2014(2):CD002207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4.
Jones CM, Campopiano M, Baldwin G, McCance-Katz E. National and State Treatment Need and Capacity for Opioid Agonist Medication-Assisted Treatment. Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e55-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302664. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
Molfenter T, Kim JS, Quanbeck A, Patel-Porter T, Starr S, McCarty D. Testing use of payers to facilitate evidence-based practice adoption: protocol for a cluster-randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2013 May 10;8:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-50.
Molfenter T, Sherbeck C, Zehner M, Starr S. Buprenorphine Prescribing Availability in a Sample of Ohio Specialty Treatment Organizations. J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2015;4(2):1000140. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000140.
Stein BD, Gordon AJ, Dick AW, Burns RM, Pacula RL, Farmer CM, Leslie DL, Sorbero M. Supply of buprenorphine waivered physicians: the influence of state policies. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Jan;48(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
Klein KJ, Conn AB, Sorra JS. Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):811-24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811.
Tremblay MA, Blanchard CM, Taylor S, Pelletier LG, Villeneuve M. Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 2009;41(4):213-226.
Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, McMurray J, Pathman DE, Gerrity M, Schwartz MD, Scheckler WE, Van Kirk J, Rhodes E, Douglas J. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999 Nov;37(11):1140-54. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199911000-00006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital Signs: Opioid painkiller prescribing. 2014.
Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990 Jan 26;263(4):549-56.
Goldstein MG, Niaura R, Willey C, Kazura A, Rakowski W, DePue J, Park E. An academic detailing intervention to disseminate physician-delivered smoking cessation counseling: smoking cessation outcomes of the Physicians Counseling Smokers Project. Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):185-96. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00018-x.
McCarty D, Gustafson DH, Wisdom JP, Ford J, Choi D, Molfenter T, Capoccia V, Cotter F. The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx): enhancing access and retention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May 11;88(2-3):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
Hoffman KA, Ford JH 2nd, Choi D, Gustafson DH, McCarty D. Replication and sustainability of improved access and retention within the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Nov 1;98(1-2):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.04.016. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/
Raudenbush SW, Liu X. Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychol Methods. 2000 Jun;5(2):199-213. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.199.
Knudsen HK, Abraham AJ, Roman PM. Adoption and implementation of medications in addiction treatment programs. J Addict Med. 2011 Mar;5(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181d41ddb.
Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
MacKinnon DP. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008.
Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010 Dec;15(4):309-34. doi: 10.1037/a0020761.
Burke WW, Litwin GH. A causal model of organizational performance and change. In: Burke WW, Lake DG, Paine JW, eds. Organizational change: A comprehensive reader. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009:273-299.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2002-2012. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration;2014.
Fudala PJ, Bridge TP, Herbert S, Williford WO, Chiang CN, Jones K, Collins J, Raisch D, Casadonte P, Goldsmith RJ, Ling W, Malkerneker U, McNicholas L, Renner J, Stine S, Tusel D; Buprenorphine/Naloxone Collaborative Study Group. Office-based treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 4;349(10):949-58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022164.
Horgan CM, Reif S, Hodgkin D, Garnick DW, Merrick EL. Availability of addiction medications in private health plans. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Mar;34(2):147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 May 17.
Schroeder SA. An agenda to combat substance abuse. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1005-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1005.
Alderks CE. Trends in the Use of Methadone and Buprenorphine at Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities: 2003 to 2011. 2013 Apr 23. In: The CBHSQ Report. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2013-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK384659/
Knudsen HK, Abraham AJ, Oser CB. Barriers to the implementation of medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders: the importance of funding policies and medical infrastructure. Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
Knudsen HK, Brown R, Jacobson N, Horst J, Kim JS, Kim H, Madden LM, Haram E, Molfenter T. Prescribers' satisfaction with delivering medications for opioid use disorder. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Oct 18;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00413-7.
Knudsen HK, Brown R, Jacobson N, Horst J, Kim JS, Collier E, Starr S, Madden LM, Haram E, Toy A, Molfenter T. Physicians' satisfaction with providing buprenorphine treatment. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Aug 26;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0163-3.
Molfenter T, Knudsen HK, Brown R, Jacobson N, Horst J, Van Etten M, Kim JS, Haram E, Collier E, Starr S, Toy A, Madden L. Test of a workforce development intervention to expand opioid use disorder treatment pharmacotherapy prescribers: protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0665-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A195010
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ENGR/INDUSTRIAL ENGR
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-0486
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.