Health of Babies Born From IVF Versus IVM at 5 Years Old
NCT ID: NCT06369415
Last Updated: 2025-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
214 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-16
2025-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Child Follow-up in Women Treated With Conventional IVF or ICSI
NCT04866524
Fresh Versus Freeze-only After CAPA IVM on PCOS Patients
NCT04297553
A Comparison of Cost - Effectiveness of Stimulated ICSI and IVM Strategy in PCOS Women
NCT03005275
Comparison of Dexamethasone Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia in Children Undergoing Orchiopexy
NCT01604915
Does the Single Use of Intravenous Dexamethasone Enhance Analgesic Quality of Pudendal Analgesia in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery?
NCT04836962
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data monitoring the physical, mental, and motor development of children born from the CAPA-IVM versus children born from the conventional IVF after 2 years under using the ASQ-3 tools and red flags showed that there were no significant differences in ASQ-3 scores at 6, 12 and 24 months between children born after IVM or IVF. The proportion of children with developmental red flags was low and did not differ between the two groups. Slightly, but significantly, lower ASQ-3 problem-solving and personal-social scores in twins from the IVM versus IVF group at 6 months were still within the normal range and had caught up to the IVF group in the 12- and 24-month assessments.
However, another question raised is whether there is a difference in the development of children born from CAPA-IVM compared to conventional IVF after a longer follow-up period. Does the development between the two groups have a clinically significant difference? Based on these questions, we decided to conduct an assessment of the physical, behavioural, mental, and motor development of children born from CAPA-IVM and conventional IVF up to 5 years after birth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IVM children
Children born from in-vitro maturation.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour
IVF children
Children born from conventiona in-vitro fertilization.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parents agree to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04/24/DD-BVMD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.