Health of Babies Born From IVF Versus IVM at 5 Years Old

NCT ID: NCT06369415

Last Updated: 2025-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

214 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-16

Study Completion Date

2025-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators conduct a long-term follow-up at five years on offspring born from our randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether or not there is any difference in developmental outcomes in children born after capacitation IVM (CAPA IVM) compared with conventional IVF in order to give strong evidence about the safety of IVM in women with high antral follicle count.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The safety of the CAPA-IVM has also been proven by publications about the development of children born from this technique.

Data monitoring the physical, mental, and motor development of children born from the CAPA-IVM versus children born from the conventional IVF after 2 years under using the ASQ-3 tools and red flags showed that there were no significant differences in ASQ-3 scores at 6, 12 and 24 months between children born after IVM or IVF. The proportion of children with developmental red flags was low and did not differ between the two groups. Slightly, but significantly, lower ASQ-3 problem-solving and personal-social scores in twins from the IVM versus IVF group at 6 months were still within the normal range and had caught up to the IVF group in the 12- and 24-month assessments.

However, another question raised is whether there is a difference in the development of children born from CAPA-IVM compared to conventional IVF after a longer follow-up period. Does the development between the two groups have a clinically significant difference? Based on these questions, we decided to conduct an assessment of the physical, behavioural, mental, and motor development of children born from CAPA-IVM and conventional IVF up to 5 years after birth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility IVF IVM Development, Child

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IVM children

Children born from in-vitro maturation.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)

Intervention Type OTHER

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour

IVF children

Children born from conventiona in-vitro fertilization.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)

Intervention Type OTHER

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3 and behavioural screening according to Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ's)

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones. The ASQ-3 covers five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal-social behaviour.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for 2-17-year-olds. It exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists. The SDQ asks about 25 attributes, some positive and others negative. These 25 items are divided between 5 scales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems; hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviour

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All babies born following the In-vitro Maturation and In-vitro fertilization from our FM study (NCT03405701) participated in our previous follow-up study (NCT04296357)
* Parents agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Babies died under or at 60 months
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mỹ Đức Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mỹ Đức Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mỹ Đức Hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04/24/DD-BVMD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caudal vs. Pudendal Block in Peds GU
NCT05708989 WITHDRAWN PHASE4