Child Follow-up in Women Treated With Conventional IVF or ICSI

NCT ID: NCT04866524

Last Updated: 2022-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

322 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-14

Study Completion Date

2021-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the physical, mental and motor development of babies born from pregnancy using ICSI technique and and conventional IVF in non-male factor infertile couples. Based on our previous RCT (NCT03428919), the non-male factor couples were randomly assigned to IVF or ICSI, which leads to the similarity in characteristics of these two groups. Hence, the result of analyzing these offsprings would be preciously valuable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over the past two decades, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) indications have been extended and routinely applied to all cases of assisted reproductive techniques: unexplained infertility, poor-quality oocytes, low oocyte yeild, advanced marternal age, prior failed fertilization with conventional insemination, after in-vitro maturation of oocytes and for cases of cryopreserved oocytes (Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2020). In 2004, fertilization using ICSI accounted for nearly 60% of all aspirations globally. In the Middle East, the number of ICSI cycles increased rapidly from 2000 (47.6%) to 2007 (65.2%), and reached 97.8% in the Middle East in 2007 (Ishihara et al, 2015). Another survey recorded in Europe in 2011, out of a total of 437,510 cycles of fresh embryo transfer, 68% of cycles were performed using ICSI techniques. In male infertility cases, the rate of implementation of ICSI increased from 76.3% to 93.3%. In particular, in cases of non-male-factor infertility, the incidence of ICSI also increased from 15.4% to 66.9%. From 2008-2012, of 494 907 treatment cycles, 74.6% used ICSI. In which, ICSI accounts for 92.9% of the cycle of male infertility and 64.5% of the cycle of non-male-factor infertility (Boulet, 2015).

However, ICSI is an invasive technique that bypasses the natural barriers of fertilization. This has led to concern about an increase in the incidence of anomalies in ICSI-born babies as this technique is increasingly being used in all cases of contraception. In contrast, there are studies that have also compared IVF with ICSI and show that in the ICSI cycle, the incidence of multiple pregnancies and low birth weight infants is lower than that of IVF, although there is no difference in infant survival between the two groups (Boulet et al, 2015).

In addition to the short-term outcomes, the investigators also have to consider the long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. There is still not much evidence comparing the effects of the above methods, if any, on the psychomotor development in children.

Therefore, the investigators decide to conduct a study to compare the physical, mental and motor development of babies born from pregnancy using ICSI technique and and conventional IVF in non-male factor infertile couples.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Conventional IVF, ICSI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ICSI technique

In ICSI group, insemination will be performed by using ICSI, 3 - 4 hours after oocyte retrieval. OCCs will be stripped by using hyaluronidase. Only matured oocytes will be inseminated.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3

Intervention Type OTHER

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.

Physical development and General Health

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical development and General health examination

Developmental Red flags

Intervention Type OTHER

Developmental Red flags Questionnaires

Conventional IVF

In conventional IVF group, insemination will be performed by conventional IVF. Two hours after retrieval, collected OCCs will be inseminated for another 2 hours, at a concentration of 100,000 motile sperm/ml. Inseminated OCCs will be cultured overnight in culture medium.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3

Intervention Type OTHER

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.

Physical development and General Health

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical development and General health examination

Developmental Red flags

Intervention Type OTHER

Developmental Red flags Questionnaires

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3

Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical development and General Health

Physical development and General health examination

Intervention Type OTHER

Developmental Red flags

Developmental Red flags Questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Live babies born from ICSI Versus Conventional IVF in Non-male Factor Couples (NCT03428919)
* Parents agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Babies died after the perinatal period.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

36 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mỹ Đức Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nghia A Nguyen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mỹ Đức Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mỹ Đức Hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nguyen NA, Nguyen NT, Tran VTT, Vo TTM, Uong TS, Nguyen HT, Nguyen NT, Nguyen DL, Pham TD, Nguyen DTN, Ho TM, Vuong LN. Developmental outcomes of children born through ICSI versus conventional IVF (cIVF) in couples with non-male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 5:deae120. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae120. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38840410 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04/2021/MĐ-HĐĐĐ

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caudal vs. Pudendal Block in Peds GU
NCT05708989 WITHDRAWN PHASE4