Pneumatic Reduction For Intussusception In Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study
NCT ID: NCT06365333
Last Updated: 2024-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3562 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-31
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of Use of Indocyanine Green in Pediatric Colorectal Surgery
NCT04904081
Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children
NCT04117633
Comparison of Sclerotherapy Agents Used for Rectal Prolapse Treatment in Children
NCT06353230
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Combined With or Without Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT03060330
A Within Subjects Comparison of Two Antegrade Flushing Regimens in Children
NCT02435069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FGAR-treated
Patients diagnosed with idiopathic intussusception, admitted to the National Children's Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017, exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms consistent with intussusception, and confirmed via ultrasound examination
Fluoroscopic-guided air-enema reduction (FGAR)
A hand-held pump facilitated the delivery of atmospheric air, while pressure was monitored using a digital gauge. A two-way Foley's balloon catheter, ranging from 18oF to 24oF in diameter depending on age, was inserted rectally to introduce air. Following insertion, the balloon was filled with 10cc of saline to prevent air leakage, with patient immobilization ensured by leg straps and hand positioning above the head for abdominal exposure. Under intermittent fluoroscopy, the surgeon operated the pump with the right hand, inflating the catheter to 80 to 120 mmHg, simultaneously palpating the intussusceptum with the left hand, employing a deep gliding motion for deep and fixed cases. Successful reduction, indicated by air entry into the small bowel, was confirmed under fluoroscopy, with a subsequent brief rotating abdominal massage ensuring uniform air distribution throughout the small intestine, confirming complete reduction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluoroscopic-guided air-enema reduction (FGAR)
A hand-held pump facilitated the delivery of atmospheric air, while pressure was monitored using a digital gauge. A two-way Foley's balloon catheter, ranging from 18oF to 24oF in diameter depending on age, was inserted rectally to introduce air. Following insertion, the balloon was filled with 10cc of saline to prevent air leakage, with patient immobilization ensured by leg straps and hand positioning above the head for abdominal exposure. Under intermittent fluoroscopy, the surgeon operated the pump with the right hand, inflating the catheter to 80 to 120 mmHg, simultaneously palpating the intussusceptum with the left hand, employing a deep gliding motion for deep and fixed cases. Successful reduction, indicated by air entry into the small bowel, was confirmed under fluoroscopy, with a subsequent brief rotating abdominal massage ensuring uniform air distribution throughout the small intestine, confirming complete reduction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fluoroscopy-guided pneumatic reduction was performed with a maximum of three attempts. Patients who did not respond to pneumatic reduction underwent minimally invasive surgical intervention, either laparoscopic reduction or trans-umbilical mini-open reduction.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients deemed unsuitable for air enema reduction due to a grossly distended abdomen or compromised cardiopulmonary function.
2 Months
30 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vinmec Research Institute of Stem Cell and Gene Technology
OTHER
National Children's Hospital, Vietnam
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nguyen Thanh Quang
Pediatric Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Quang T Nguyen, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Pediatric Surgery, The National Hospital of Pediatrics, Hanoi, Vietnam
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The National Hospital of Pediatrics
Hanoi, , Vietnam
Vinmec Research Institute of Stem Cell and Gene Technology
Hanoi, , Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bines JE, Liem NT, Justice FA, Son TN, Kirkwood CD, de Campo M, Barnett P, Bishop RF, Robins-Browne R, Carlin JB; Intussusception Study Group. Risk factors for intussusception in infants in Vietnam and Australia: adenovirus implicated, but not rotavirus. J Pediatr. 2006 Oct;149(4):452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.010.
Tran LA, Yoshida LM, Nakagomi T, Gauchan P, Ariyoshi K, Anh DD, Nakagomi O, Thiem VD. A High Incidence of Intussusception Revealed by a Retrospective Hospital-Based Study in Nha Trang, Vietnam between 2009 and 2011. Trop Med Health. 2013 Sep;41(3):121-7. doi: 10.2149/tmh.2013-09. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
Chowdhury TK, Ahsan MQ, Chowdhury MZ, Chowdhury MTS, Imam MS, Alam MA, Farooq MAA. Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception with intermittent radiography: an alternative to fluoroscopy or ultrasound-guided reduction in low-income and middle-income countries. World J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Jan 14;4(1):e000221. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2020-000221. eCollection 2021.
Trang NV, Burnett E, Ly LH, Anh NP, Hung PH, Linh HM, Trang NCT, Canh TM, Minh VT, Tate JE, Yen C, Anh DD, Parashar UD. Recurrent intussusception among infants less than 2 years of age in Vietnam. Vaccine. 2018 Dec 14;36(51):7901-7905. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.056. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
Hailemariam T, Sisay S, Mebratu Y, Belay F, Getinet T, Solomon S, Belina M, Abebe A, Hilawi Tewodros B, Manyazewal T. Effects of sedatives on radiologic enema reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jan;170:111237. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111237. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
Khorana J, Tepjuk S, Singhavejsakul J, Tepmalai K, Chantakhow S, Ukarapol N, Damrongmanee A, Samerchua A, Bunchungmongkol N, Visrutaratna P, Morakote W, Nate-Anong B, Chanaturakarnnon S, Itthidecharon K, Chaimongkhon P. A comparison of the success rate of pneumatic reduction in intussusception between general anesthesia and deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Apr 25;39(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05474-2.
Xie X, Wu Y, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Chen G, Xiang B. A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Beres AL, Baird R. An institutional analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis of pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction for pediatric intussusception. Surgery. 2013 Aug;154(2):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.036.
Chew R, Ditchfield M, Paul E, Goergen SK. Comparison of safety and efficacy of image-guided enema reduction techniques for paediatric intussusception: A review of the literature. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Dec;61(6):711-717. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12601. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
Okumus M, Emektar A. Pediatric intussusception and early discharge after pneumatic reduction. Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Jun;119(3):162-165. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Cox S, Withers A, Arnold M, Chitnis M, de Vos C, Kirsten M, le Grange SM, Loveland J, Machaea S, Maharaj A, Madhi SA, Tate JE, Parashar UD, Groome MJ. Clinical presentation and management of childhood intussusception in South Africa. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Oct;37(10):1361-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04946-7. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
Wong CW, Chan IH, Chung PH, Lan LC, Lam WW, Wong KK, Tam PK. Childhood intussusception: 17-year experience at a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Dec;21(6):518-23. doi: 10.12809/hkmj144456. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
Burnett E, Kabir F, Van Trang N, Rayamajhi A, Satter SM, Liu J, Yousafzai MT, Anh DD, Basnet AT, Flora MS, Houpt E, Qazi SH, Canh TM, Rayamajhi AK, Saha BK, Saddal NS, Muneer S, Hung PH, Islam T, Ali SA, Tate JE, Yen C, Parashar UD. Infectious Etiologies of Intussusception Among Children <2 Years Old in 4 Asian Countries. J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 7;221(9):1499-1505. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz621.
Yang H, Wang G, Ding Y, Li Y, Sun B, Yue M, Wang J, Song D. Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception. Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211040911. doi: 10.1177/00368504211040911.
Wang Z, He QM, Zhang H, Zhong W, Xiao WQ, Lu LW, Yu JK, Xia HM. Intussusception patients older than 1 year tend to have early recurrence after pneumatic enema reduction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Sep;31(9):855-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3726-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Khorana J, Singhavejsakul J, Ukarapol N, Laohapensang M, Wakhanrittee J, Patumanond J. Enema reduction of intussusception: the success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Dec 15;11:1837-42. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S92169. eCollection 2015.
Elzeneini WMA, Cusick E. A large single-center experience in management of pediatric intussusception. Pediatr Int. 2023 Jan-Dec;65(1):e15495. doi: 10.1111/ped.15495.
Delgado-Miguel C, Garcia A, Delgado B, Munoz-Serrano AJ, Miguel-Ferrero M, Barrena S, Lopez-Santamaria M, Martinez L. Intussusception Management in Children: A 15-Year Experience in a Referral Center. Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;90(12):1198-1203. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04248-3. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Younes A, Lee S, Lee JI, Seo JM, Jung SM. Factors Associated with Failure of Pneumatic Reduction in Children with Ileocolic Intussusception. Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;8(2):136. doi: 10.3390/children8020136.
Carapinha C, Truter M, Bentley A, Welthagen A, Loveland J. Factors determining clinical outcomes in intussusception in the developing world: Experience from Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2016 Jan 12;106(2):177-80. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i2.9672.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1451_04/BVNTW-VNCSKTE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.