Anal Fistula Plug, a Retrospective Study

NCT ID: NCT04319861

Last Updated: 2020-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

207 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed clinical data of patients who were treated with an anal fistula plug for trans-sphincteric anal fistulas, and evaluated the long-term therapeutic effect of an anal fistula plug and the risk factors impacting anal fistula healing. In addition, we assessed the effects of post-operative changes on anal function, as well as the risk factors affecting anal function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of anal fistulas, especially involving significant anal sphincters, continues to represent a challenge for surgeons. Surgery has been the mainstay of treatment, and the ideal goal of anal fistula treatment is to obliterate the fistulous tract, while preserving the anal sphincter and avoiding fecal incontinence. The anal fistula plug is a sphincter-sparing procedure that uses biological substances to close an anorectal fistula. Several studies have preliminarily shown that the anal fistula plug had advantages of simple and repeatable application, preservation of sphincter integrity, minimal patient discomfort, and subsequent surgical options if needed. The healing rate of anal fistula plug varied widely, which range from 14% to 88%, and no significant effect on anal function in the short term. Therefore, long-term observation and a large sample size are needed to evaluate the long-term healing rate of an anal fistula plug, and the effect on anal function. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term therapeutic effect of an anal fistula plug in patients with trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano, as well as the impact on anal function.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healing Rate Recurrence Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anal fistula plug

The anal fistula plug procedure was performed as followings. A fistula probe was used to identify fistula tracts, and internal and external openings. Gentle mechanical debridement was performed with a blunt curette to remove the necrotic tissue with care not to enlarge the track, then hydrogen peroxide and sterile saline were used to repeatedly to irrigate the fistula. The anal fistutla plug was filled into the fistula, and sutured with a figure-of-eight 2-to-0 Vicryl suture to ensure the plug was fixed in the internal opening of the fistula, avoiding the anal fistula plug being extruded. Trimming the plug at the external fistula and the external opening was left open to ensure adequate drainage.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anal fistula plug procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A fistula probe was used to identify fistula tracts, and internal and external openings. Gentle mechanical debridement was performed with a blunt curette to remove the necrotic tissue with care not to enlarge the track, then hydrogen peroxide and sterile saline were used to repeatedly to irrigate the fistula. The anal fistutla plug was filled into the fistula, and sutured with a figure-of-eight 2-to-0 Vicryl suture to ensure the plug was fixed in the internal opening of the fistula, avoiding the anal fistula plug being extruded. Trimming the plug at the external fistula and the external opening was left open to ensure adequate drainage.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anal fistula plug procedure

A fistula probe was used to identify fistula tracts, and internal and external openings. Gentle mechanical debridement was performed with a blunt curette to remove the necrotic tissue with care not to enlarge the track, then hydrogen peroxide and sterile saline were used to repeatedly to irrigate the fistula. The anal fistutla plug was filled into the fistula, and sutured with a figure-of-eight 2-to-0 Vicryl suture to ensure the plug was fixed in the internal opening of the fistula, avoiding the anal fistula plug being extruded. Trimming the plug at the external fistula and the external opening was left open to ensure adequate drainage.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with trans-sphincteric anal fistula.
* The case information was complete.
* Not receive other treatment previously.

Exclusion Criteria

* Fistulas related to Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or anorectal tumors.
* Underwent surgical incision and drainage for acute perianal infections within 3 months.
* Multiple fistula tracts \> 2.
* Poor underlying condition and unable to tolerate surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhen Jun Wang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhen Jun Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jiagang Han

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Plug 2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LIFT-plug vs LIFT, a RCT Trial
NCT04310800 UNKNOWN NA
PRP Use in Treatment of Fistula Ano
NCT04187651 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Tissue Therapy of Transsphincteric Anal Fistula
NCT06303752 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2