Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-23
2022-11-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique on Perceived Pain, Situational Anxiety and Satisfaction Levels During Mammography Screening.
NCT06296927
The Effect of Cold Application to the Sacral Area on Labor Comfort:
NCT05693623
The Effect of LI4 Acupressure on Perineal Pain and Postpartum Comfort During Episiotomy Repair
NCT06407505
The Effect of Cold Application on Patient's Pain, Comfort and Satisfaction After Cesarean Section
NCT05799547
The Effect of Therapeutic Touch at Birth on Pain, Birth Duration, Traumatic Birth Perception and Anxiety
NCT06426329
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypotheses H1 The pain levels of individuals who received cold application to the LI4 point after surgery are lower than those who received routine care.
H2 Anxiety levels of individuals who underwent cold application to the LI4 point after surgery are lower than those who received routine care.
H3 The nausea levels of individuals who underwent cold application to the LI4 point after surgery are lower than those who received routine care.
Variables of the Study Independent Variables: Cold Application Dependent Variables: Socio-demographic characteristics, pain level, anxiety level, vital signs (body temperature, blood pressure, pulse, respiration), analgesic drug use, nausea level. The study was conducted in the inpatient wards of a state hospital.
Research data were collected every weekday between February 28, 2022 and November 18, 2022 on Monday-Tuesday-Wednesday-Thursday-Thursday-Friday.
The study population consisted of 116 individuals who underwent abdominal surgery and were followed up in the inpatient ward. Inclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years of age
* Can speak and understand Turkish
* Does not have any cognitive, affective and verbal problems that prevent them from communicating,
* No postoperative complications developed,
* Underwent surgery with general anesthesia,
* No cold allergies,
* Standardized analgesia protocol implemented,
* Intensive care follow-up continues as of the fourth hour of the postoperative period,
* Women without a physical hand or arm disability will be included. Patient information form, Mcgill Melzack short pain form, Visual Analog Scale, STAI - TX and Cold Application Evaluation Form were used to collect data. In order to evaluate the comprehensibility of the forms created for data collection and the designed cold application process, a pre-application was performed with the participation of 10 patients who underwent open surgical intervention in the abdominal region in the inpatient ward of the hospital.
The data of the patients within the scope of the preliminary application were not included in the sample.
After the patient was taken to the individual room, his/her clinical status was evaluated. The purpose of the study, LI4 cold application method and its effect on pain were explained. Life findings were measured. Then, pain assessment was performed using the SCS and Mcgill Pain Scale Short Form. State Anxiety Scale and Trait Anxiety Scale were completed by the researcher using face-to-face interview method. After the end of the application, the patient's vital signs were evaluated. The efficacy of cold application was evaluated with SCS, Mcgill Pain Scale Short Form, State Anxiety Scale. At 30, 60 and 120 minutes after cold application, the same evaluations made after the application were repeated and recorded. After the 120th minute evaluation, the "Cold Application Evaluation Form" was completed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cold application
The first group consists of the experimental group in which cold application is planned to be applied to the hand LI4 point after surgical intervention
Cold Application
Cold application was applied to the LI4 acupressure point on the patients' hands using an ice battery.
Control
The control group in which routine interventions in the clinic are applied.
Cold Application
Cold application was applied to the LI4 acupressure point on the patients' hands using an ice battery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold Application
Cold application was applied to the LI4 acupressure point on the patients' hands using an ice battery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Does not have any cognitive, affective and verbal problems that prevent them from communicating,
* No postoperative complications (bleeding, infection, etc.),
* Underwent surgery with general anesthesia,
* Standardized analgesia protocol implemented,
* Women without a physical hand or arm disability will be included.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergic to cold,
* Women with a certain period of intensive care (excluding postoperative care room) follow-up after surgery will not be included in the study
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ayşegül Alioğulları
PHD Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayşegül ALİOĞULLARI, PhD Student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sağlık Bilimleri University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saglik Bilimleri University
Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
171002100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.