Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use of Patient Reported Complications After Digital Consent

NCT ID: NCT06351865

Last Updated: 2025-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-07

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient report complication data to our best knowledge has not been studied yet in electronic consent. This study is a feasibility study to assess whether patients will reliably report their complications, the quality of this reporting and whether the information provided in the consent form matches up to their experience. This data will then be used to improve the consent process and evaluate whether the Patient Initiated Follow Up (PIFU) model is effective or if it leads to underreporting of problems.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At the time of consent, patients are informed of possible post-operative complications. It is often not known whether these complications actually occur, whether there are others which go unreported and the extent, both quantitatively and qualitatively, of the complications. Patient reported complication data, to our best knowledge has not been previously studied.

This study is a feasibility study to assess whether patients will reliably report their complications, the quality of this reporting and whether the information provided in the consent form matches up to their experience. In this case, consent is to be sought digitally; the digital consent form includes a procedure specific list of recognised complications but these might not reflect actual patient experience.

If PRC data collection is feasible and reliable, this technique could be scaled to create a consent feedback loop, enabling operative outcome data to be collected from all patients, to be be used to improve the consent process for subsequent patients.

Awareness of post-operative patient complications is important and it is an NHS (National Health Service) requirement that complications are discussed within regular clinical governance (mortality/morbidity) audit departmental meetings. Currently this process relies on clinicians obtaining and reporting these complications. The move towards Patient Initiated Follow Up (PIFU) models may be leading to underreporting of problems. Potentially Patient Reported Complications would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the benefits and consequences of the various surgical procedures. This in turn might help facilitate 'shared decision making' and allow treatment decisions to be tailored to the individual patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Complication of Surgical Procedure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consent form 1- Adult patients who have the capacity to consent for themselves.
* Female adult aged 18years or above
* Diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer suitable for breast conserving surgery
* Undergoing Wide Local Excision of the breast and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
* Participant must be able to fill out an electronic questionnaire or take part in a phone questionnaire.
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to consent for themselves or do not wish to participate.
* Patients who need an interpreter.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of East Anglia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward St John

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Alexandra Hospital

Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ian Gedge

Role: CONTACT

02392286000 ext. 5153

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Edward St John

Role: primary

02392286000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHU/2023/21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.