New Digital Person-based Care Model in Patients With HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06348654
Last Updated: 2024-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-03-30
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The care pathway of patients with this type of disease represents an optimal setting for the implementation of an innovative narrative medicine pathway that, aided by integrative therapies, aims to support and accompain them in their treatment journey with a continuum of care. Moreover, the narrative medicine platform will implement the actual "static" way to define QoL with the classic Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) questionnaires, that reflect the patient status at a certain time point and not as a dinamic entity. It is on the basis of these assumptions that the present application project on the use of the DNMLAB digital narrative diary in the oncology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli was born.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New Model for Integrating Person-based Care (PbC) in the Treatment of Advanced HER2-negative Breast Cancer
NCT05893368
Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metastatic Breast Cancer (Qualitative Study)
NCT03248258
An Interactive Empowerment Tool for Breast Cancer Patients
NCT02312700
Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
NCT03591848
Psychological Well-being in Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT06590727
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
New measurement tools that assess also the patient's perspective have been introduced into clinical practice.
Among these new tools are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), aimed at determining patients' perceived quality of life during treatment and follow-up. Systematic collection of patient-reported outcomes has indeed been proven to be a valid, reliable, and accurate methodology in oncology, both for assessing treatment outcomes and monitoring drug toxicity, and for avoiding all those cases where impacts and symptoms are overlooked or underestimated by clinicians.
However, currently approved and standardized questionnaires do not comprehensively inform clinicians about how the disease and treatments affect the patient's care pathway.
In this context, narrative medicine, on the other hand, has proven to be a valid and reliable methodology capable of integrating the patient's perspective into standard clinical assessment.
Qualitative narrative medicine methodologies have been recognized as useful and effective to the extent that they allow clinicians to access the existential and emotional components of patients' experience of care, and for their ability to enrich the information expressed in standardized questionnaires. Narrative methodologies thus make it possible to capture perceptions of quality of life, and thus to capture a highly subjective dimension influenced by each individual's needs and expectations (e.g., relative deprivation).
Narrative medicine has also been shown to be feasible and reliable in improving doctor-patient communication and promoting bio-psycho-social personalization of the care pathway, particularly when used in combination with digital listening tools, such as the digital narrative diary. Studies on digital narrative medicine in oncology have shown the potential of digital platforms in promoting listening to patient needs, especially when listening is done by a multidisciplinary care team throughout the care pathway. It has also been seen how digital has a positive impact not only on the patient but also, more broadly, on the entire care team.
The transition from a traditional, disease-centered model of care to a new, more person-centered model of care has since led to the introduction of integrative medicine in cancer treatment centers. Through the rational and evidence-based use of lifestyle, psychological support, and complementary therapies, integrative medicine promotes better control of side effects, greater adherence to treatment protocols, and optimization of patients' quality of life throughout the care pathway. In the case of breast cancer, integrative oncology combines conventional cancer treatments with integrative therapies in order to support women in their bio-psycho-social dimensions, thus providing effective and minimally invasive responses to complex and sometimes unmet health needs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
introduction of digital listening may improve the quality of life of patients withe breast cancer
Introduction of a digital listening and communication pathway aimed at improving the quality of life of patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years;
* Knowledge of Italian language;
* Life expectancy ≥24 weeks.
In case the patient is unable to actively participate, the caregiver can act as a vicarious narrator and contribute to the study by supplementing the patient's contribution.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to participate in the study due to psychiatric disorders;
* Unavailability of an e-mail account or unwillingness to use web-based tools.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
FABI ALESSANDRA
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fabi Alessandra
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6392
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.