Spinal Morphine or Intravenous Lidocaine in Robot-assisted Upper Urologic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06349668
Last Updated: 2026-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-09
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Is the decrease in wellbeing as quantified by the patient-centered outcome scale "Quality of Recovery 15" (QoR-15), from baseline to the first day after surgery (POD 1), at least 8.0 points less in patients receiving spinal analgesia in addition to general anesthesia?
* Does spinal analgesia result in improved recovery as quantified by QoR-15 at POD 7, the incidence of postoperative pain at rest and at mobilization, nausea and vomiting, the need for opioid analgesics, time out-of-bed, length of stay and the incidence of complications?
* Does spinal analgesia increase workload in the OR, as quantified by time from arrival in the OR to start of surgery?
* Does spinal analgesia result in an increased incidence of hypotension and cardiac dysfunction during surgery, as well as an increased incidence of pruritus after surgery?
Participants will be randomized to receive either spinal analgesia with bupivacaine and morphine preoperatively or an intravenous infusion with lidocaine intraoperatively.
QoR-15 and other markers of recovery will be registered using structured interviews preoperatively, at POD1 and POD7. In addition, patients will record pain at rest and at mobilization three times daily in a diary.
In a subgroup of patients advanced hemodynamic parameters will be recorded using pulse-contour analysis before, during and after surgery. Blood samples will also be collected in these patients at fixed intervals and analyzed for amongst others inflammation and cardiac dysfunction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Robotic-Assisted Urologic Surgery
NCT03824808
Use of Perioperative Pain Blocks In Urological Surgery
NCT04426500
Perioperative Epidural Versus Intravenous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Open Upper Abdominal Surgery
NCT03005171
The Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT03624985
Liposomal vs. Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control
NCT06231355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lidocaine infusion
intraoperative intravenous infusion of lidocaine at a rate of 2 mg/kg/t (Ideal Body Weight)
lidocaine infusion
intraoperative intravenous infusion of lidocaine at a rate of 2 mg/kg/t after a bolus of 2 mg/kg (Ideal Body Weight if BMI \> 22, otherwise ABW)
spinal analgesia
single shot spinal analgesia with 0.2-0.3 mg morphine and 10-20 mg bupivacaine before surgery
spinal analgesia with morphine and bupivacaine
single shot spinal analgesia with 0.2-0.3 mg morphine and 10-20 mg bupivacaine before surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
spinal analgesia with morphine and bupivacaine
single shot spinal analgesia with 0.2-0.3 mg morphine and 10-20 mg bupivacaine before surgery
lidocaine infusion
intraoperative intravenous infusion of lidocaine at a rate of 2 mg/kg/t after a bolus of 2 mg/kg (Ideal Body Weight if BMI \> 22, otherwise ABW)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient gives oral and written informed consent after having received oral and writen information about the study
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient is a minor or declared incompetent, has severe psychiatric disease or is expected not to be able to understand the study information due to severe restrictions in vision, hearing, cognition, reading or Swedish language abilities
* The patient is a female who is pregnant or breastfeeding
* The patient is a pre-menopausal female who has not undergone sterilisation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy, and is not using highly-effective contraception with low user-dependency and cannot provide a negative pregnancy test
* The patient is scheduled for emergency surgery
* Research staff not available
* Scheduled significant simultaneous surgery on another organ
* The anesthesiologist in charge has planned spinal or epidural analgesia
* The patient has clear contraindications to spinal analgesia, e.g. severe coagulopathy, severe aortic stenosis, previous back surgery with rods, or spinal analgesia can be expected to be technically challenging (severe obesity, severe scoliosis)
* The patient has clear contraindications to lidocaine infusion, e.g. proven allergy to local anesthetics, myasthenia gravis, renail failure (eGFR \< 30), hepatic failure caused by acute hepatitis or cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B or higher, severe cardiac arrythmias or insuffiency (NYHA IIIb or higher)
* The patient has previously participated in the trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Linkoeping University
OTHER_GOV
Hans Bahlmann
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hans Bahlmann
Senior Consultant. Sponsor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin Holmberg
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Länssjukhuset i Kalmar
Kalmar, , Sweden
University Hospital Linköping
Linköping, , Sweden
Centrallasarettet Växjö
Vaxjo, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-505941-21-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.