Stability of Secondary Intraocular Lenses With no Capsular Support

NCT ID: NCT06345846

Last Updated: 2024-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-30

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assessment and differences in the centration, tilt and wobble of two secondary IOLs without capsular support.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acquired or congenital weakness of the zonules, either as part of a pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), high myopia, past ocular trauma, post vitreoretinal surgery, and recurrent uveitis are the most common reasons for implantation of a secondary intraocular lenses (IOL) after cataract surgery. There are several techniques available to implant a secondary IOL in eyes with inadequate capsular support. Some of the most common techniques are the placement of a chamber angle-supported anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL), an iris-fixated IOL (IFIOL) and several different possibilities of scleral fixation of the IOL (SFIOL).

While those methods have all been found to show high safety and efficiency, there are certain procedure-specific limitations. One approach to sutureless implantation of a SFIOL is the "double needle flanged technique" described by Yamane et al. When using this technique, there is no need for extensive scleral incisions or distinct scleral manipulation, however, it may be challenging for the surgeon and may lead to complications such as "iris-optic-capture".

Past studies found no significant difference of postoperative best corrected visual acuity or rate of complications when comparing the three mentioned techniques, therefore, up to now choice of implantation and fixation technique lies with the surgeon's preferences and abilities. However, all three techniques have their drawbacks.

Hence, the aim of this study is to assess the centration, tilt, and wobble of secondary IOLs (comparing an IFIOL and a SFIOL) without capsular support.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IFIOL

Patients with an implanted IFIOL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IFIOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implanted IFIOL

SFIOL

Patients with an implanted SFIOL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SFIOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implanted SFIOL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IFIOL

Implanted IFIOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

SFIOL

Implanted SFIOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Secondary IOL implantation performed at the Hanusch Hospital
* IFIOL or SFIOL implanted
* Older than 21 years
* Written informed consent prior to recruitment

Exclusion Criteria

* Concurrent participation in another drug or device clinical investigation
* Pregnancy (pregnancy test will be taken pre-operatively in women of reproductive age)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Findl, Prim. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Krankenhaus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital, Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Secondary IOL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pseudophakic Accommodation
NCT00716339 COMPLETED NA