Rotational Stability of the Acrysof, Tecnis and Envista Intraocular Lenses

NCT ID: NCT04345380

Last Updated: 2020-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

199 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-09

Study Completion Date

2017-08-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary:

Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide. In the UK, more than half of people who are over 65 years old have some cataract development in one or both eyes. The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted. It is estimated that around 10 million cataract operations are performed around the world each year. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications.

During the past two decades, cataract surgery underwent tremendous change and modernisation resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery and a safe technique with a short rehabilitation time for the patient. Traditional spherical monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) restore best-corrected vision and may lessen the need for spectacles. These IOLs correct only the spherical portion of the total refractive error and do not correct corneal astigmatism. Astigmatism is a visually disabling refractive error affecting the general population, especially those with cataract. At least 15% to 20% of cataract patients have 1.5 diopters (D) or more of corneal or refractive astigmatism. With increased patient expectations, the trend is not only to remove the cataract but also to address the problem of pre-existing astigmatism at the time of surgery.

Surgical-induced astigmatism can be reduced by smaller incisions, i.e. microincision cataract surgery (MICS), which by definition is surgery performed through incisions smaller than 2.0 mm, reducing the need for suturing. This results in better corneal optical quality, thus improving visual outcomes. There are also other surgical options to correct preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery like: selectively positioning of the phacoemulsification incision; astigmatic keratotomy with corneal or limbal relaxing incisions; excimer laser refractive procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy, laser in situ keratomileusis, and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy; or implanting pseudophakic toric posterior chamber intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Toric IOLs have been shown to result in good visual and refractive outcomes. Combined with MICS, these IOLs can allow effective correction of cylindrical errors intraoperatively, improving visual quality and thus leading to spectacle independence. Plate haptic and loop haptic toric IOLs have been considered for about a decade but have been associated with postoperative rotational instability. Rotation of a toric lens from its intended orientation degrades its corrective power, with approximately 3.3% loss of cylindrical power for every degree off axis. A misorientation of approximately 30° negates the effectiveness of astigmatic correction, and a misorientation of more than 30° may induce additional astigmatism. Although some patients are asymptomatic despite induced astigmatism, others experience symptoms such as blurred or distorted vision, headache, fatigue, eyestrain, squinting, or eye discomfort. Thus, IOL orientation stability is an essential goal in toric IOL design.

RATIONALE

The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the axial IOL rotation and optical quality (refraction, visual acuity, decentration and tilt) and capsular bag reaction after micro-incision surgery with an IOL implantation in cataract patients - Acrysof SN60WF, Tecnis ZCB00 \& Envista MX60 IOL

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract Astigmatism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acrysof Rotation

Implantation of the Acrysof SN60WF Intraocular lens to the 0 ±10, 45± 10, 90±10 or 135± axis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implantation of an Alcon Acrysof SN60WF intraocular lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Tecnis Rotation

Implantation of the Tecnis ZCB00 Intraocular lens to the 0 ±10, 45± 10, 90±10 or 135± axis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implantation of an AMO Tecnis ZCB00 intraocular lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Envista Rotation

Implantation of the Envista MX60 Intraocular lens to the 0 ±10, 45± 10, 90±10 or 135± axis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implantation of an Envista MX60 intraocular lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implantation of an Alcon Acrysof SN60WF intraocular lens

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Implantation of an AMO Tecnis ZCB00 intraocular lens

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Implantation of an Envista MX60 intraocular lens

Patients suffering from senile cataract getting replaced their human crystalline cataractous lens

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Uni- or bilateral age-related cataract necessitating phacoemulsification extraction and posterior IOL implantation
* Need for spherical IOL correction between 10.00 and 30.00 D
* Pupil dilation of ≥ 6.5 mm
* Age 40 and older

Exclusion Criteria

* Corneal abnormality
* Pseudoexfoliation
* Preceding ocular surgery or trauma
* Uncontrolled glaucoma
* Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
* Iris neovascularization
* History of uveitis/iritis
* Microphthalmus
* Recurrent intraocular inflammation of unknown etiology
* Blind fellow eye
* Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease
* Pregnancy and lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rupert Menapace

Univ. Prof. Dr. med.univ. Rupert Menapace

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Vienna Allgemeines Krankenhaus

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1746/2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.