Direct Superior Approach Versus PosteroLateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (SPLAsH)

NCT ID: NCT06342843

Last Updated: 2025-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

211 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-26

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare postoperative pain, health related quality of life (HRQoL), function, rehabilitation, urinary incontinence, muscle atrophy and component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the posterolateral approach (PLA) or the direct superior approach (DSA). In addition, the CT images will be used to validate a new metal artefact reduction technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: The primary objective is to evaluate health related quality of life (HRQoL) after THA using the DSA compared to the golden standard PLA in patients with incapacitating hip osteoarthritis after two weeks. The secondary objectives are divided into 1) long-term HRQoL evaluation, 2) physical performance, 3) radiologic muscle atrophy and component placement of the THA, 4) validation of a new metal artifact reduction technique for CT, and 5) relationship urinary incontinence and muscle atrophy.

Study design: Multicenter, prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled intervention study in which the used operation method is not shared with the patient until one year after surgery and in which the study researcher is also blinded.

Study population: A total of 211 men and women, age ≥ 18 years, with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in whom THA is indicated.

Intervention (if applicable): For this randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients will be randomly allocated in one of two groups: one group receives THA by using PLA, the other group receives THA by using DSA.

Main study parameters/endpoints: As primary outcome specifically the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) is used for the short-term HRQoL.

Secondary parameters/endpoints are split up into different categories. 1) HRQoL evaluation on the long term using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (NRS score, Short form-12 (SF-12), HOOS subscales, Global rating of change, and Euro Quality of Life questionnaire). 2) Physical function using physical functioning test (Timed Up and Go test, 40-meter self-paced walk test for hip osteoarthritis and Stair Climb Test). 3) Muscle atrophy measurements using CT scans. Muscle atrophy is expressed in both quantity of muscle volume loss and extend of fatty infiltration using the Goutallier scale. Component placement is measured in different angles. 4) Evaluation of a new metal artifact reduction technique for CT images. 5) Relationship between muscle atrophy and urinary incontinence after total hip replacement.

Other study parameters include preoperative demographics such as age and gender, perioperative data such as blood loss, use of analgetics, operation time and postoperative complications such as infection, aseptic loosening and dislocation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

multicenter, prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled intervention study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Posterolateral approach (PLA)

THA by using the posterolateral approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a surgical procedure in which an orthopaedic surgeon removes the damaged bone and cartilage and replaces this with prosthetic components.

Direct superior approach (DSA)

THA using the direct superior approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a surgical procedure in which an orthopaedic surgeon removes the damaged bone and cartilage and replaces this with prosthetic components.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total Hip Arthroplasty

a surgical procedure in which an orthopaedic surgeon removes the damaged bone and cartilage and replaces this with prosthetic components.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subject

* Has symptomatic incapacitating coxarthrosis in whom total hip arthroplasty (THA) is indicated, diagnosed by both physical examination and pelvic/hip X-ray
* Has signed informed consent
* Is ageing 18 years or older at time of study entry
* Is competent and able to participate in follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous ipsilateral hip surgery
* BMI \>35 kg/m2
* Contralateral incapacitating coxarthrosis, diagnosed by both physical examination and pelvic/hip X-ray
* Neurological conditions influencing walking pattern
* Inability to walk without walking aid preoperatively
* Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
* Severe hip dysplasia
* Cognitive impairment
* Malignancies or metastases involving the hip joint or the nearby soft tissues
* Inability to speak and write Dutch language
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Isala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roelina Munnik, PhD

Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Harmen B. Ettema, MD/PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Isala

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amphia

Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Isala

Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden

Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Harmen Ettema, MD/PhD

Role: CONTACT

0031886245656

Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0031886245375

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stefan BT Bolder, MD

Role: primary

Diederik de Boer, MSc.

Role: primary

00316248117

Roelina Munnik, PhD

Role: backup

00316245375

Wierd Zijlstra, MD/PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL81395.075.22

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SPLAsH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.