Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-09
2026-10-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylactic Antibiotics on Urethral Catheter Withdrawal
NCT00126698
Effect of Antibiotics on Urinary Microbiome
NCT04230746
Using Antibiotics to Prevent Infections in Hemodialysis Patients During Catheter Placement
NCT06814223
Antibiotic Dosing in Geriatric Patients At the Emergency Department
NCT04436991
Effectiveness of Three Times of Starting Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria.
NCT03269604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CMS understandably has declared CAUTI a "never event", a term coined by the National Quality Forum and used to describe preventable hospital acquired infections4. Since 2008 they have tied this quality metric to severe hospital payment penalties to incentivize prioritization of strategies to decrease CAUTIs.
Despite considerable efforts to remain in compliance with this guidance, and hospitals nationwide implementing safer catheter placement training as well as aggressive early catheter removal protocols, it has become clear that CAUTIs are almost never a never event5. Quantitative analyses of these events have estimated that only 65-70% of CAUTIs are truly preventable with current evidence-based prevention strategies6.
In our intensive care units the pragmatic reasons explaining this phenomenon are abundantly clear. Trauma patients critically injured with multiple spinal, pelvic and long bone fractures, intubated on a ventilator and immobile have substantially higher rates of urine retention when foley catheters are removed aggressively within 72 hours of admission per current infection control protocols. Similarly, neuro critical care patients who incurred a massive stroke or traumatic brain injury who are immobilized from their disabilities do not routinely succeed with early catheter removal protocols. Replacing indwelling foley catheters after multiple failed intermittent urinary catheterizations incurs increased urethral trauma and pain for the patient, increased risk of procedural complications, and increased risk of CAUTI due to repeated urethral instrumentation.
On the basis of and in response to a clear need to develop novel strategies to eliminate CAUTIs in those patients for whom early catheter removal is not deemed clinically appropriate, we collected 8 months of pilot data at our level I trauma center ICU in which we prophylactically instilled an antibiotic containing irrigation solution into the indwelling foley catheters in patients who required catheterization for greater than 3 days. Over the observed pilot period zero CAUTI events were recorded as compared to a comparison control group of trauma patients with identical inclusion criteria for whom 9 "never event" CAUTIs were incurred. These differences were statistically significant.
The current proposal aims to expand this pilot data and conduct a full randomized trial to validate the efficacy of gentamicin antibiotic irrigation in critically ill patients with an indwelling foley catheter of greater than 3 days duration. We plan to expand our patient population to include critically ill patients admitted to the trauma, neuro-critical care and medical ICU units.
The current proposal aims to expand this pilot data and conduct a randomized trial to validate the efficacy of gentamicin antibiotic irrigation in critically ill patients with an indwelling foley catheter of greater than 3 days duration. We plan to expand our patient population to include critically ill patients admitted to the trauma, neuro-critical care and medical ICU units. Our primary research question is: Is prophylactic gentamicin bladder irrigation associated with decreased CAUTI in a cohort of catheterized trauma and neuro critical care patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gentamicin
14.4 mg gentamicin dissolved in 30 mL 0f 0.9% saline administered BID
Gentamicin
random assignment to gentamicin or placebo bladder instillation to prevent CAUTI (catheterized urinary track infection)
Placebo
30 mL of 0.9% saline administered BID
Gentamicin
random assignment to gentamicin or placebo bladder instillation to prevent CAUTI (catheterized urinary track infection)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gentamicin
random assignment to gentamicin or placebo bladder instillation to prevent CAUTI (catheterized urinary track infection)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. admitted with a trauma, surgical, or neuro-critical care diagnosis
3. indwelling foley catheter in place
Exclusion Criteria
2. Traumatic bladder injury
3. Gross hematuria
4. Chronic indwelling urethral or chronic suprapubic foley catheter
5. allergy to gentamicin or similar aminoglycosides
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hahn Soe-Lin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Jpseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-500-243-50-35
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.